Yes, all states are likely occupied territory because they have corporate overlays domiciled in DC, UNLESS, the sovereign Union state Governor has terminated the contract with the MUNICIPAL SERVICE CORPORATION (MSC) overlay. STATE OF TEXAS CORPORATION (1933) is NOT the same as Union Texas state (1845). There is an illegal, unconstitutional "contract" between the Union state "delegating" sovereignty (or attempting to delegate) to the MSC. A sovereign entity, by definition, cannot delegate its sovereignty.
It is theoretically possible that the "publicly named Governors" are not the actual sovereign Union State Governors, depending on the state Const. (Pre 1933). A corporate official, although claiming to ALSO be the sovereign Governor, most likely cannot hold both positions (per violation of A4S4), and it is possible that all 50 sovereign Governor positions are currently vacant waiting for a Patriot and resident of that state to claim the position.
Yes, all states are likely occupied territory because they have corporate overlays domiciled in DC, UNLESS, the sovereign Union state Governor has terminated the contract with the MUNICIPAL SERVICE CORPORATION (MSC) overlay. STATE OF TEXAS CORPORATION (1933) is NOT the same as Union Texas state (1845). There is an illegal, unconstitutional "contract" between the Union state "delegating" sovereignty (or attempting to delegate) to the MSC. A sovereign entity, by definition, cannot delegate its sovereignty.
It is theoretically possible that the "publicly named Governors" are not the actual sovereign Union State Governors, depending on the state. A corporate official, although claiming to ALSO be the sovereign Governor, most likely cannot hold both positions (per violation of A4S4), and it is possible that all 50 sovereign Governor positions are currently vacant waiting for a Patriot and resident of that state to claim the position.
Yes, all states are likely occupied territory because they have corporate overlays domiciled in DC, UNLESS, the sovereign Union state Governor has terminated the contract with the MUNICIPAL SERVICE CORPORATION (MSC) overlay. STATE OF TEXAS CORPORATION (1933) is NOT the same as Union Texas State (1845). There is an illegal, unconstitutional "contract" between the Union State "delegating" sovereignty (or attempting to delegate) to the MSC. A sovereign entity, by definition, cannot delegate its sovereignty.
It is theoretically possible that the "publicly named Governors" are not the actual sovereign Union State Governors, depending on the state. A corporate official, although claiming to ALSO be the sovereign Governor, most likely cannot hold both positions (per violation of A4S4), and it is possible that all 50 sovereign Governor positions are currently vacant waiting for a Patriot and resident of that state to claim the position.