It doesn't say that he had an interview with Snowden, either. I mean, there is "an interview" and then there is "an interview", not necessarily the same thing.

Sounds to me like the author is playing fast and loose with his vocabulary.

Anyway, it's an interesting find. But I'm very skeptical until I see more corroboration of this content.

It doesn't say that he had an interview with Snowden, either. I mean, there is "an interview" and then there is "an interview", not necessarily the same thing.

Sounds to me like the author is playing fast and loose with his vocabulary.

FWIW, on the basis of this article, I expect nothing about Tucker and Snowden to come out. Credibility rating? 50%