I used the term individuals loosely, as implicitly stated in my rhetoric. The Cabal is a subgroup of the groups you call out.
But I am NOT using the term loosely. I want to know why YOU don't call out the specific names of the specific individuals.
If you don't believe in speaking about certain GROUPS, then you should not be doing it yourself.
You don't really even know WHO the "Cabal" members are.
Ergo, you can't possibly know which other groups they do or do not also belong to.
You say they are the REAL bad guys that we should shine the light on.
I agree that light should be shined on them, but I do not agree that light should not ALSO be shined on others, who are not necessarily a part of this mysterious "Cabal."
You are saying: Don't talk about X. X is not the real problem. Z is the real problem. So, ONLY talk about Z.
I say: No, both X and Z are problems. Let's talk about BOTH.
Yes. But why is that [60% of violent criminals are black males] the case?
I don't give a damn why he murdered some people in a drive-by shooting.
I DO give a damn that HE did IT.
Sure, he was influenced by the bad guys. But he lives in a society where he is ALSO influenced by good guys.
Other people had the same influences and did NOT do what HE did do.
And when "He" is "Them" and "They" are causing problems that other people are not, that is worthy of discussion.
it is an association fallacy that is one of the primary tools that the Cabal uses to misdirect away from their actions.
SO. FUCKING. WHAT ???
We can talk about BOTH types of bad people.
YOU want to push CENSORSHIP.
"Don't talk about THESE people. You are ONLY allowed to talk about THOSE people."
Fuck off with that shit.
Until you can tell me the NAMES of the INDIVIDUALS that are the "Cabal," you are guilty of the very thing you accuse me of.
Surely, there must be different levels to the "Cabal." Some are merely foot soldiers who only know things on a "need to know basis."
So you want to refer to the man behind the curtain as the TRUE bad guy, but you DON'T EVEN KNOW WHO THE FUCK THAT IS.
I don't care that there are a lot of people who are influenced by bad people.
Finding out that such a thing even exists is what "AWAKENING" is all about.
First, we have to realize that a problem exists. Then, we might have a shot at solving the problem.
When there are MANY problems, then we talk about ALL the problems, and prioritize, and go from there.
I want to talk about the atrocities the Americans did in WWII for example, but it is essential to first talk about the Cabal that put them up to it, made them believe that their actions were "right and true," and how they made them believe those false things.
Fine. Tell me WHO those people were.
We know that Balfour (an Englishman) and Rothschild (a jew) were two of the men who did it.
Who else?
You don't fucking KNOW.
All you want to do is talk about a vague "boogeymen" for the purpose of shutting down discussion of larger groups of people who did bad things, as well.
In the case of the Americans who fought the Germans in WW2, from the American side, most of them were drafted. Some volunteered before being drafted, due to the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Of course, this was all directed by other people engaged in propaganda -- FDR being among them.
But ...
These people (on both sides) were also in a situation where they were ordered to do something.
If you are a POW prisoner, and a guard hands you a gun with one bullet and tells you to shoot your best friend prisoner in the head, or he will kill you, what do you do?
Is it a moral question to shoot the POW, or shoot the guard (in which case other guards will kill you), or kill yourself, or shoot the bullet into the air (in which case the guards will kill you)?
Is it a MORAL question?
NO!
Once violence has been inserted into the situation (here, the guard is threatening to kill you if you don't do as ordered), then it is no longer a MORAL question.
It is a survival question, and whatever you choose to do is neither moral nor immoral. It is simply your preferred choice in how to handle the situation.
OTOH, a car full of black men do a drive-by shooting out of CHOICE, which DOES make it a moral issue.
Did other people insert gansta rap music and anti-White hatred in their Critical Race Theory schools, and lies about black slavery (black slaves in Africa were captured by other blacks, and sold to jews and Arabs and sold into slavery around the world), and a belief that they had to step up to other blacks who disrespected them, or get revenge if someone steals your drugs?
Yes, all of the above.
But they also live in a society that knows that murder is wrong.
The tiny hat club lives in a society that knows that enslaving women and torturing children is wrong.
They have mutiple influences, and I don't care that they chose the bad influence over the good.
It was their CHOICE.
So, I will talk about those types of choices just as much as the "Cabal" and all the evil they do.
Are MOST of the "Cabal" people also jewish?
I suspect yes, but cannot prove it.
I can look at the fact that 2% of Americans are jewish, but they are 80% of the Biden cabinet, including Myorkas who not only is a jew holding the office that "regulates" illegal migration, but is ALSO a director of the NGO that is the top funder of those illegal immigrants. He is both funding illegal immigration and also using his political office to evade enforcing the law against it.
And most of those jews are NOT the most capable people to hold such offices, so there must be some reason other than merit that got them there.
I look at the Federal Reserve, all the harm it has caused, and find out that it was formed mostly by jews and non-jew puppets of jews.
I look at many, many other similar situations and I can draw some conclusions.
I don't necessarily think that "Harvey the Jew" down the street in the accounting office is conspiring to do evil things, but his religion teaches him to go along with it.
And ALL jews who practice Judaism are influenced by the Talmud, no matter what their personal views are.
We only have generalizations because they TEND to be generally true in a lot of cases -- certainly, a lot more than is true of other races.
How many jews do drive-by shootings? Not many.
How many Japanese work at the central banks (other than in Japan)?
Not many.
I will not be censored just because pointing out certain things make some people uncomfortable. Yes, some people are bad, and there are also OTHER people who are also bad.
Your attempt to claim that ONLY the "Cabal" (whomever that is, even though you don't know) are worthy of criticism is an attempt at censorship.
I reject it.
I used the term individuals loosely, as implicitly stated in my rhetoric. The Cabal is a subgroup of the groups you call out.
But I am NOT using the term loosely. I want to know why YOU don't call out the specific names of the specific individuals.
If you don't believe in speaking about certain GROUPS, then you should not be doing it yourself.
You don't really even know WHO the "Cabal" members are.
Ergo, you can't possibly know which other groups they do or do not also belong to.
You say they are the REAL bad guys that we should shine the light on.
I agree that light should be shined on them, but I do not agree that light should not ALSO be shined on others, who are not necessarily a part of this mysterious "Cabal."
You are saying: Don't talk about X. X is not the real problem. Z is the real problem. So, ONLY talk about Z.
I say: No, both X and Z are problems. Let's talk about BOTH.
Yes. But why is that [60% of violent criminals are black males] the case?
I don't give a damn why he murdered some people in a drive-by shooting.
I DO give a damn that HE did IT.
Sure, he was influenced by the bad guys. But he lives in a society where he is ALSO influenced by good guys.
Other people had the same influences and did NOT do what HE did do.
And when "He" is "Them" and "They" are causing problems that other people are not, that is worthy of discussion.
it is an association fallacy that is one of the primary tools that the Cabal uses to misdirect away from their actions.
SO. FUCKING. WHAT ???
We can talk about BOTH types of bad people.
YOU want to push CENSORSHIP.
"Don't talk about THESE people. You are ONLY allowed to talk about THOSE people."
Fuck off with that shit.
Until you can tell me the NAMES of the INDIVIDUALS that are the "Cabal," you are guilty of the very thing you accuse me of.
Surely, there must be different levels to the "Cabal." Some are merely foot soldiers who only know things on a "need to know basis."
So you want to refer to the man behind the curtain as the TRUE bad guy, but you DON'T EVEN KNOW WHO THE FUCK THAT IS.
I don't care that there are a lot of people who are influenced by bad people.
Finding out that such a thing even exists is what "AWAKENING" is all about.
First, we have to realize that a problem exists. Then, we might have a shot at solving the problem.
When there are MANY problems, then we talk about ALL the problems, and prioritize, and go from there.
I want to talk about the atrocities the Americans did in WWII for example, but it is essential to first talk about the Cabal that put them up to it, made them believe that their actions were "right and true," and how they made them believe those false things.
Fine. Tell me WHO those people were.
We know that Balfour (an Englishman) and Rothschild (a jew) were two of the men who did it.
Who else?
You don't fucking KNOW.
All you want to do is talk about a vague "boogeymen" for the purpose of shutting down discussion of larger groups of people who did bad things, as well.
In the case of the Americans who fought the Germans in WW2, from the American side, most of them were drafted. Some volunteered before being drafted, due to the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Of course, this was all directed by other people engaged in propaganda -- FDR being among them.
But ...
These people (on both sides) were also in a situation where they were ordered to do something.
If you are a POW prisoner, and a guard hands you a gun with one bullet and tells you to shoot your best friend prisoner in the head, or he will kill you, what do you do?
Is it a moral question to shoot the POW, or shoot the guard (in which case other guards will kill you), or kill yourself, or shoot the bullet into the air (in which case the guards will kill you)?
Is it a MORAL question?
NO!
Once violence has been inserted into the situation (here, the guard is threatening to kill you if you don't do as ordered), then it is no longer a MORAL question.
It is a survival question, and whatever you choose to do is neither moral nor immoral. It is simply your preferred choice in how to handle the situation.
OTOH, a car full of black men do a drive-by shooting out of CHOICE, which DOES make it a moral issue.
Did other people insert gansta rap music and anti-White hatred in their Critical Race Theory schools, and lies about black slavery (black slaves in Africa were captured by other blacks, and sold to jews and Arabs and sold into slavery around the world), and a belief that they had to step up to other blacks who disrespected them, or get revenge if someone steals your drugs?
Yes, all of the above.
But they also live in a society that knows that murder is wrong.
The tiny hat club lives in a society that knows that enslaving women and torturing children is wrong.
They have mutiple influences, and I don't care that they chose the bad influence over the good.
It was their CHOICE.
So, I will talk about those types of choices just as much as the "Cabal" and all the evil they do.
Are MOST of the "Cabal" people also jewish?
Is suspect yes, but cannot prove it.
I can look at the fact that 2% of Americans are jewish, but they are 80% of the Biden cabinet, including Myorkas who not only is a jew holding the office that "regulates" illegal migration, but is ALSO a director of the NGO that is the top funder of those illegal immigrants. He is both funding illegal immigration and also using his political office to evade enforcing the law against it.
And most of those jews are NOT the most capable people to hold such offices, so there must be some reason other than merit that got them there.
I look at the Federal Reserve, all the harm it has caused, and find out that it was formed mostly by jews and non-jew puppets of jews.
I look at many, many other similar situations and I can draw some conclusions.
I don't necessarily think that "Harvey the Jew" down the street in the accounting office is conspiring to do evil things, but his religion teaches him to go along with it.
And ALL jews who practice Judaism are influenced by the Talmud, no matter what their personal views are.
We only have generalizations because they TEND to be generally true in a lot of cases -- certainly, a lot more than is true of other races.
How many jews do drive-by shootings? Not many.
How many Japanese work at the central banks (other than in Japan)?
Not many.
I will not be censored just because pointing out certain things make some people uncomfortable. Yes, some people are bad, and there are also OTHER people who are also bad.
Your attempt to claim that ONLY the "Cabal" (whomever that is, even though you don't know) are worthy of criticism is an attempt at censorship.
I reject it.
I used the term individuals loosely, as implicitly stated in my rhetoric. The Cabal is a subgroup of the groups you call out.
But I am NOT using the term loosely. I want to know why YOU don't call out the specific names of the specific individuals.
If you don't believe in speaking about certain GROUPS, then you should not be doing it yourself.
You don't really even know WHO the "Cabal" members are.
Ergo, you can't possibly know which other groups they do or do not also belong to.
You say they are the REAL bad guys that we should shine the light on.
I agree that light should be shined on them, but I do not agree that light should not ALSO be shined on others, who are not necessarily a part of this mysterious "Cabal."
You are saying: Don't talk about X. X is not the real problem. Z is the real problem. So, ONLY talk about Z.
I say: No, both X and Z are problems. Let's talk about BOTH.
Yes. But why is that [60% of violent criminals are black males] the case?
I don't give a damn why he murdered some people in a drive-by shooting.
I DO give a damn that HE did IT.
Sure, he was influenced by the bad guys. But he lives in a society where he is ALSO influenced by good guys.
Other people had the same influences and did NOT do what HE did do.
And when "He" is "Them" and "They" are causing problems that other people are not, that is worthy of discussion.
it is an association fallacy that is one of the primary tools that the Cabal uses to misdirect away from their actions.
SO. FUCKING. WHAT ???
We can talk about BOTH types of bad people.
YOU want to push CENSORSHIP.
"Don't talk about THESE people. You are ONLY allowed to talk about THOSE people."
Fuck off with that shit.
Until you can tell me the NAMES of the INDIVIDUALS that are the "Cabal," you are guilty of the very things you accuse me of.
Surely, there must be different levels to the "Cabal." Some are merely foot soldiers who only know things on a "need to know basis."
So you want to refer to the man behind the curtain as the TRUE bad guy, but you DON'T EVEN KNOW WHO THE FUCK THAT IS.
I don't care that there are a lot of people who are influenced by bad people.
Finding out that such a thing even exists is what "AWAKENING" is all about.
First, we have to realize that a problem exists. Then, we might have a shot at solving the problem.
When there are MANY problems, then we talk about ALL the problems, and prioritize, and go from there.
I want to talk about the atrocities the Americans did in WWII for example, but it is essential to first talk about the Cabal that put them up to it, made them believe that their actions were "right and true," and how they made them believe those false things.
Fine. Tell me WHO those people were.
We know that Balfour (an Englishman) and Rothschild (a jew) were two of the men who did it.
Who else?
You don't fucking KNOW.
All you want to do is talk about a vague "boogeymen" for the purpose of shutting down discussion of larger groups of people who did bad things, as well.
In the case of the Americans who fought the Germans in WW2, from the American side, most of them were drafted. Some volunteered before being drafted, due to the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Of course, this was all directed by other people engaged in propaganda -- FDR being among them.
But ...
These people (on both sides) were also in a situation where they were ordered to do something.
If you are a POW prisoner, and a guard hands you a gun with one bullet and tells you to shoot your best friend prisoner in the head, or he will kill you, what do you do?
Is it a moral question to shoot the POW, or shoot the guard (in which case other guards will kill you), or kill yourself, or shoot the bullet into the air (in which case the guards will kill you)?
Is it a MORAL question?
NO!
Once violence has been inserted into the situation (here, the guard is threatening to kill you if you don't do as ordered), then it is no longer a MORAL question.
It is a survival question, and whatever you choose to do is neither moral nor immoral. It is simply your preferred choice in how to handle the situation.
OTOH, a car full of black men do a drive-by shooting out of CHOICE, which DOES make it a moral issue.
Did other people insert gansta rap music and anti-White hatred in their Critical Race Theory schools, and lies about black slavery (black slaves in Africa were captured by other blacks, and sold to jews and Arabs and sold into slavery around the world), and a belief that they had to step up to other blacks who disrespected them, or get revenge if someone steals your drugs?
Yes, all of the above.
But they also live in a society that knows that murder is wrong.
The tiny hat club lives in a society that knows that enslaving women and torturing children is wrong.
They have mutiple influences, and I don't care that they chose the bad influence over the good.
It was their CHOICE.
So, I will talk about those types of choices just as much as the "Cabal" and all the evil they do.
Are MOST of the "Cabal" people also jewish?
Is suspect yes, but cannot prove it.
I can look at the fact that 2% of Americans are jewish, but they are 80% of the Biden cabinet, including Myorkas who not only is a jew holding the office that "regulates" illegal migration, but is ALSO a director of the NGO that is the top funder of those illegal immigrants. He is both funding illegal immigration and also using his political office to evade enforcing the law against it.
And most of those jews are NOT the most capable people to hold such offices, so there must be some reason other than merit that got them there.
I look at the Federal Reserve, all the harm it has caused, and find out that it was formed mostly by jews and non-jew puppets of jews.
I look at many, many other similar situations and I can draw some conclusions.
I don't necessarily think that "Harvey the Jew" down the street in the accounting office is conspiring to do evil things, but his religion teaches him to go along with it.
And ALL jews who practice Judaism are influenced by the Talmud, no matter what their personal views are.
We only have generalizations because they TEND to be generally true in a lot of cases -- certainly, a lot more than is true of other races.
How many jews do drive-by shootings? Not many.
How many Japanese work at the central banks (other than in Japan)?
Not many.
I will not be censored just because pointing out certain things make some people uncomfortable. Yes, some people are bad, and there are also OTHER people who are also bad.
Your attempt to claim that ONLY the "Cabal" (whomever that is, even though you don't know) are worthy of criticism is an attempt at censorship.
I reject it.
I used the term individuals loosely, as implicitly stated in my rhetoric. The Cabal is a subgroup of the groups you call out.
But I am NOT using the term loosely. I want to know why YOU don't call out the specific names of the specific individuals.
If you don't believe in speaking about certain GROUPS, then you should not be doing it yourself.
You don't really even know WHO the "Cabal" members are.
Ergo, you can't possibly know which other groups they do or do not also belong to.
You say they are the REAL bad guys that we should shine the light on.
I agree that light should be shined on them, but I do not agree that light should not ALSO be shined on others, who are not necessarily a part of this mysterious "Cabal."
You are saying: Don't talk about X. X is not the real problem. Z is the real problem. So, ONLY talk about Z.
I say: No, both X and Z are problems. Let's talk about BOTH.
Yes. But why is that [60% of violent criminals are black males] the case?
I don't give a damn why he murdered some people in a drive-by shooting.
I DO give a damn that HE did IT.
Sure, he was influenced by the bad guys. But he lives in a society where he is ALSO influenced by good guys.
Other people had the same influences and did NOT do what HE did do.
And when "He" is "Them" and "They" are causing problems that other people are not, that is worthy of discussion.
it is an association fallacy that is one of the primary tools that the Cabal uses to misdirect away from their actions.
SO. FUCKING. WHAT ???
We can talk about BOTH types of bad people.
YOU want to push CENSORSHIP.
"Don't talk about THESE people. You are ONLY allowed to talk about THOSE people."
Fuck off with that shit.
Until you can tell me the NAMES of the INDIVIDUALS that are the "Cabal," you are guilty of the very things you accuse me of.
Surely, there must be different levels to the "Cabal." Some are merely foot soldiers who only know things on a "need to know basis."
So you want to refer to the man behind the curtain as the TRUE bad guy, but you DON'T EVEN KNOW WHO THE FUCK THAT IS.
I don't care that there are a lot of people who are influenced by bad people.
Finding out that such a thing even exists is what "AWAKENING" is all about.
First, we have to realize that a problem exists. Then, we might have a shot at solving the problem.
When there are MANY problems, then we talk about ALL the problems, and prioritize, and go from there.
I want to talk about the atrocities the Americans did in WWII for example, but it is essential to first talk about the Cabal that put them up to it, made them believe that their actions were "right and true," and how they made them believe those false things.
Fine. Tell me WHO those people were.
We know that Balfour (an Englishman) and Rothschild (a jew) were two of the men who did it.
Who else?
You don't fucking KNOW.
All you want to do is talk about a vague "boogeymen" for the purpose of shutting down discussion of larger groups of people who did bad things, as well.
In the case of the Americans who fought the Germans in WW2, from the American side, most of them were drafted. Some volunteered before being drafted, due to the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Of course, this was all directed by other people engaged in propaganda -- FDR being among them.
But ...
These people (on both sides) were also in a situation where they were ordered to do something.
If you are a POW prisoner, and a guard hands you a gun with one bullet and tells you to shoot your best friend prisoner in the head, or he will kill you, what do you do?
Is it a moral question to shoot the POW, or shoot the guard (in which case other guards will kill you), or kill yourself, or shoot the bullet into the air (in which case the guards will kill you)?
Is it a MORAL question?
NO!
Once violence has been inserted into the situation (here, the guard is threatening to kill you if you don't do as ordered), then it is no longer a MORAL question.
It is a survival question, and whatever you choose to do is neither moral nor immoral. It is simply your preferred choice in how to handle the situation.
OTOH, a car full of black men do a drive-by shooting out of CHOICE, which DOES make it a moral issue.
Did other people insert gansta rap music and anti-White hatred in their Critical Race Theory schools, and lies about black slavery (black slaves in Africa were captured by other blacks, and sold to jews and Arabs and sold into slavery around the world), and a belief that they had to step up to other blacks who disrespected them, or get revenge if someone steals your drugs?
Yes, all of the above.
But they also live in a society that knows that murder is wrong.
The tiny hat club lives in a society that knows that enslaving women and torturing children is wrong.
They have mutiple influences, and I don't care that they chose the bad influence over the good.
It was their CHOICE.
So, I will talk about those types of choices just as much as the "Cabal" and all the evil they do.
Are MOST of the "Cabal" people also jewish?
Is suspect yes, but cannot prove it.
I can look at the fact that 2% of Americans are jewish, but they are 80% of the Biden cabinet, including Myorkas who not only is a jew holding the office that "regulates" illegal migration, but is ALSO a director of the NGO that is the top funder of those illegal immigrants. He is both funding illegal immigration and also using his political office to evade enforcing the law against it.
And most of those jews are NOT the most capable people to hold such offices, so there must be some reason other than merit that got them there.
I look at the Federal Reserve, all the harm it has caused, and find out that it was formed mostly by jews and non-jew puppets of jews.
I look at many, many other similar situations and I can draw some conclusions.
I don't necessarily think that "Harvey the Jew" down the street in the accounting office is conspiring to do evil things, but his religion teaches him to go along with it.
And ALL jews who practice Judaism are influenced by the Talmud, no matter what their personal views are.
We only have generalizations because they TEND to be generally true in a lot of cases -- certainly, a lot more than is true of other races.
How many jews do drive-by shootings? Not many.
How many Japanese work at the central banks (other than in Japan)?
Not many.
I will not be censored just because pointing out certain things make some people uncomfortable, and there are also OTHER people who are also bad.
You attempt to claim that ONLY the "Cabal" (whomever that is, even though you don't know) are worthy of criticism is an attempt at censorship.
I reject it.
I used the term individuals loosely, as implicitly stated in my rhetoric. The Cabal is a subgroup of the groups you call out.
But I am NOT using the term loosely. I want to know why YOU don't call out the specific names of the specific individuals.
If you don't believe in speaking about certain GROUPS, then you should not be doing it yourself.
You don't really even know WHO the "Cabal" members are.
Ergo, you can't possibly know which other groups they do or do not also belong to.
You say they are the REAL bad guys that we should shine the light on.
I agree that light should be shined on them, but I do not agree that light should not ALSO be shined on others, who are not necessarily a part of this mysterious "Cabal."
You are saying: Don't talk about X. X is not the real problem. Z is the real problem. So, ONLY talk about Z.
I say: No, both X and Z are problems. Let's talk about BOTH.
Yes. But why is that [60% of violent criminals are black males] the case?
I don't give a damn why he murdered some people in a drive-by shooting.
I DO give a damn that HE did IT.
Sure, he was influenced by the bad guys. But he lives in a society where he is ALSO influenced by good guys.
Other people had the same influences and did NOT do what HE did do.
And when "He" is "Them" and "They" are causing problems that other people are not, that is worthy of discussion.
it is an association fallacy that is one of the primary tools that the Cabal uses to misdirect away from their actions.
SO. FUCKING. WHAT ???
We can talk about BOTH types of bad people.
YOU want to push CENSORSHIP.
"Don't talk about THESE people. You are ONLY allowed to talk about THOSE people."
Fuck off with that shit.
Until you can tell me the NAMES of the INDIVIDUALS that are the "Cabal," you are guilty of the very things you accuse me of.
Surely, there must be different levels to the "Cabal." Some are merely foot soldiers who only know things on a "need to know basis."
So you want to refer to the man behind the curtain as the TRUE bad guy, but you DON'T EVEN KNOW WHO THE FUCK THAT IS.
I don't care that there are a lot of people who are influenced by bad people.
Finding out that such a thing even exists is what "AWAKENING" is all about.
First, we have to realize that a problem exists. Then, we might have a shot at solving the problem.
When there are MANY problems, then we talk about ALL the problems, and prioritize, and go from there.
I want to talk about the atrocities the Americans did in WWII for example, but it is essential to first talk about the Cabal that put them up to it, made them believe that their actions were "right and true," and how they made them believe those false things.
Fine. Tell me WHO those people were.
We know that Balfour (an Englishman) and Rothschild (a jew) were two of the men who did it.
Who else?
You don't fucking KNOW.
All you want to do is talk about a vague "boogeymen" for the purpose of shutting down discussion of larger groups of people who did bad things, as well.
In the case of the Americans who fought the Germans in WW2, from the American side, most of them were drafted. Some volunteered before being drafted, due to the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Of course, this was all directed by other people engaged in propaganda -- FDR being among them.
But ...
These people (on both sides) were also in a situation where they were ordered to do something.
If you are a POW prisoner, and a guard hands you a gun with one bullet and tells you to shoot your best friend prisoner in the head, or he will kill you, what do you do?
Is it a moral question to shoot the POW, or shoot the guard (in which case other guards will kill you), or kill yourself, or shoot the bullet into the air (in which case the guards will kill you)?
Is it a MORAL question?
NO!
Once violence has been inserted into the situation (here, the guard is threatening to kill you if you don't do as ordered), then it is no longer a MORAL question.
It is a survival question, and whatever you choose to do is neither moral nor immoral. It is simply your preferred choice in how to handle the situation.
OTOH, a car full of black men do a drive-by shooting out of CHOICE, which DOES make it a moral issue.
Did other people insert gansta rap music and anti-White hatred in their Critical Race Theory schools, and lies about black slavery (black slaves in Africa were captured by other blacks, and sold to jews and Arabs and sold into slavery around the world), and a belief that they had to step up to other blacks who disrespected them, or get revenge if someone steals your drugs?
Yes, all of the above.
But they also live in a society that knows that murder is wrong.
The tiny hat club lives in a society that knows that enslaving women and torturing children is wrong.
They have mutiple influences, and I don't care that they chose the bad influence over the good.
It was their CHOICE.
So, I will talk about those types of choices just as much as the "Cabal" and all the evil they do.
Are MOST of the "Cabal" people also jewish?
Is suspect yes, but cannot prove it.
I can look at the fact that 2% of Americans are jewish, but they have are 80% of the Biden cabinet, including Myorkas who not only is a jew holding the office that "regulates" illegal migration, but is ALSO a director of the NGO that is the top funder of those illegal immigrants.
And most of those jews are NOT the most capable people to hold such offices, so there must be some reason other than merit that got them there.
I look at the Federal Reserve, all the harm it has caused, and find out that it was formed mostly by jews and non-jew puppets of jews.
I look at many, many other similar situations and I can draw some conclusions.
I don't necessarily think that "Harvey the Jew" down the street in the accounting office is conspiring to do evil things, but his religion teaches him to go along with it.
And ALL jews who practice Judaism are influenced by the Talmud, no matter what their personal views are.
We only have generalizations because they TEND to be generally true in a lot of cases -- certainly, a lot more than is true of other races.
How many jews do drive-by shootings? Not many.
How many Japanese work at the central banks (other than in Japan)?
Not many.
I will not be censored just because pointing out certain things make some people uncomfortable, and there are also OTHER people who are also bad.
You attempt to claim that ONLY the "Cabal" (whomever that is, even though you don't know) are worthy of criticism is an attempt at censorship.
I reject it.
I used the term individuals loosely, as implicitly stated in my rhetoric. The Cabal is a subgroup of the groups you call out.
But I am NOT using the term loosely. I want to know why YOU don't call out the specific names of the specific individuals.
If you don't believe in speaking about certain GROUPS, then you should not be doing it yourself.
You don't really even know WHO the "Cabal" members are.
Ergo, you can't possibly know which other groups they do or do not also belong to.
You say they are the REAL bad guys that we should shine the light on.
I agree that light should be shined on them, but I do not agree that light should not ALSO be shined on others, who are not necessarily a part of this mysterious "Cabal."
You are saying: Don't talk about X. X is not the real problem. Z is the real problem. So, ONLY talk about Z.
I say: No, both X and Z are problems. Let's talk about BOTH.
Yes. But why is that [60% of violent criminals are black males] the case?
I don't give a damn why he murdered some people in a drive-by shooting.
I DO give a damn that HE did IT.
Sure, he was influenced by the bad guys. But he lives in a society where he is ALSO influenced by good guys.
Other people had the same influences and did NOT do what HE did do.
And when "He" is "Them" and "They" are causing problems that other people are not, that is worthy of discussion.
it is an association fallacy that is one of the primary tools that the Cabal uses to misdirect away from their actions.
SO. FUCKING. WHAT ???
We can talk about BOTH types of bad people.
YOU want to push CENSORSHIP.
"Don't talk about THESE people. You are ONLY allowed to talk about THOSE people."
Fuck off with that shit.
Until you can tell me the NAMES of the INDIVIDUALS that are the "Cabal," you are guilty of the very things you accuse me of.
Surely, there must be different levels to the "Cabal." Some are merely foot soldiers who only know things on a "need to know basis."
So you want to refer to the man behind the curtain as the TRUE bad guy, but you DON'T EVEN KNOW WHO THE FUCK THAT IS.
I don't care that there are a lot of people who are influenced by bad people.
Finding out that such a thing even exists is what "AWAKENING" is all about.
First, we have to realize that a problem exists. Then, we might have a shot at solving the problem.
When there are MANY problems, then we talk about ALL the problems, and prioritize, and go from there.
it is essential to first talk about the Cabal that put them up to it, made them believe that their actions were "right and true," and how they made them believe those false things.
Fine. Tell me WHO those people were.
We know that Balfour (and Englishman) and Rothschild (a jew) were two of the men who did it.
Who else?
You don't fucking KNOW.
All you want to do is talk about a vague "boogeymen" for the purpose of shutting down discussion of larger groups of people who did bad things, as well.
In the case of the Americans who fought the Germans in WW2, from the American side, most of them were drafted. Some volunteered before being drafted, due to the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Of course, this was all directed by other people engaged in propaganda -- FDR being among them.
But ...
These people (on both sides) were also in a situation where they were ordered to do something.
If you are a POW prisoner, and a guard hands you a gun with one bullet and tells you to shoot your best friend prisoner in the head, or he will kill you, what do you do?
Is it a moral question to shoot the POW, or shoot the guard (in which case other guards will kill you), or kill yourself, or shoot the bullet into the air (in which case the guards will kill you)?
Is it a MORAL question?
NO!
Once violence has been inserted into the situation (here, the guard is threatening to kill you if you don't do as ordered), then it is no longer a MORAL question.
It is a survival question, and whatever you choose to do is neither moral nor immoral. It is simply your preferred choice in how to handle the situation.
OTOH, a car full of black men do a drive-by shooting out of CHOICE, which DOES make it a moral issue.
Did other people insert gansta rap music and anti-White hatred in their Critical Race Theory schools, and lies about black slavery (black slaves in Africa were captured by other blacks, and sold to jews and Arabs and sold into slavery around the world), and a belief that they had to step up to other blacks who disrespected them, or get revenge if someone steals your drugs?
Yes, all of the above.
But they also live in a society that knows that murder is wrong.
The tiny hat club lives in a society that knows that enslaving women and torturing children is wrong.
They have mutiple influences, and I don't care that they chose the bad influence over the good.
It was their CHOICE.
So, I will talk about those types of choices just as much as the "Cabal" and all the evil they do.
Are MOST of the "Cabal" people also jewish?
Is suspect yes, but cannot prove it.
I can look at the fact that 2% of Americans are jewish, but they have are 80% of the Biden cabinet, including Myorkas who not only is a jew holding the office that "regulates" illegal migration, but is ALSO a director of the NGO that is the top funder of those illegal immigrants.
And most of those jews are NOT the most capable people to hold such offices, so there must be some reason other than merit that got them there.
I look at the Federal Reserve, all the harm it has caused, and find out that it was formed mostly by jews and non-jew puppets of jews.
I look at many, many other similar situations and I can draw some conclusions.
I don't necessarily think that "Harvey the Jew" down the street in the accounting office is conspiring to do evil things, but his religion teaches him to go along with it.
And ALL jews who practice Judaism are influenced by the Talmud, no matter what their personal views are.
We only have generalizations because they TEND to be generally true in a lot of cases -- certainly, a lot more than is true of other races.
How many jews do drive-by shootings? Not many.
How many Japanese work at the central banks (other than in Japan)?
Not many.
I will not be censored just because pointing out certain things make some people uncomfortable, and there are also OTHER people who are also bad.
You attempt to claim that ONLY the "Cabal" (whomever that is, even though you don't know) are worthy of criticism is an attempt at censorship.
I reject it.
I used the term individuals loosely, as implicitly stated in my rhetoric. The Cabal is a subgroup of the groups you call out.
But I am NOT using the term loosely. I want to know why YOU don't call out the specific names of the specific individuals.
If you don't believe in speaking about certain GROUPS, then you should not be doing it yourself.
You don't really even know WHO the "Cabal" members are.
Ergo, you can't possibly know which other groups they do or do not also belong to.
You say they are the REAL bad guys that we should shine the light on.
I agree that light should be shined on them, but I do not agree that light should not ALSO be shined on others, who are not necessarily a part of this mysterious "Cabal."
You are saying: Don't talk about X. X is not the real problem. Z is the real problem. So, ONLY talk about Z.
I say: No, both X and Z are problems. Let's talk about BOTH.
Yes. But why is that [60% of violent criminals are black males] the case?
I don't give a damn why he murdered some people in a drive-by shooting.
I DO give a damn that HE did IT.
Sure, he was influenced by the bad guys. But he lives in a society where he is ALSO influenced by good guys.
Other people had the same influences and did NOT do what HE did do.
And when "He" is "Them" and "They" are causing problems that other people are not, that is worthy of discussion.
it is an association fallacy that is one of the primary tools that the Cabal uses to misdirect away from their actions.
SO. FUCKING. WHAT ???
We can talk about BOTH types of bad people.
YOU want to push CENSORSHIP.
"Don't talk about THESE people. You are ONLY allowed to talk about THOSE people."
Fuck off with that shit.
Until you can tell me the NAMES of the INDIVIDUALS that are the "Cabal," you are guilty of the very things you accuse me of.
Surely, there must be different levels to the "Cabal." Some are merely foot soldiers who only know things on a "need to know basis."
So you want to refer to the man behind the curtain as the TRUE bad guy, but you DON'T EVEN KNOW WHO THE FUCK THAT IS.
I don't care that there are a lot of people who are influenced by bad people.
Finding out that such a thing even exists is what "AWAKENING" is all about.
First, we have to realize that a problem exists. Then, we might have a shot at solving the problem.
When there are MANY problems, they we talk about ALL the problems, and prioritize, and go from there.
it is essential to first talk about the Cabal that put them up to it, made them believe that their actions were "right and true," and how they made them believe those false things.
Fine. Tell me WHO those people were.
We know that Balfour (and Englishman) and Rothschild (a jew) were two of the men who did it.
Who else?
You don't fucking KNOW.
All you want to do is talk about a vague "boogeymen" for the purpose of shutting down discussion of larger groups of people who did bad things, as well.
In the case of the Americans who fought the Germans in WW2, from the American side, most of them were drafted. Some volunteered before being drafted, due to the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Of course, this was all directed by other people engaged in propaganda -- FDR being among them.
But ...
These people (on both sides) were also in a situation where they were ordered to do something.
If you are a POW prisoner, and a guard hands you a gun with one bullet and tells you to shoot your best friend prisoner in the head, or he will kill you, what do you do?
Is it a moral question to shoot the POW, or shoot the guard (in which case other guards will kill you), or kill yourself, or shoot the bullet into the air (in which case the guards will kill you)?
Is it a MORAL question?
NO!
Once violence has been inserted into the situation (here, the guard is threatening to kill you if you don't do as ordered), then it is no longer a MORAL question.
It is a survival question, and whatever you choose to do is neither moral nor immoral. It is simply your preferred choice in how to handle the situation.
OTOH, a car full of black men do a drive-by shooting out of CHOICE, which DOES make it a moral issue.
Did other people insert gansta rap music and anti-White hatred in their Critical Race Theory schools, and lies about black slavery (black slaves in Africa were captured by other blacks, and sold to jews and Arabs and sold into slavery around the world), and a belief that they had to step up to other blacks who disrespected them, or get revenge if someone steals your drugs?
Yes, all of the above.
But they also live in a society that knows that murder is wrong.
The tiny hat club lives in a society that knows that enslaving women and torturing children is wrong.
They have mutiple influences, and I don't care that they chose the bad influence over the good.
It was their CHOICE.
So, I will talk about those types of choices just as much as the "Cabal" and all the evil they do.
Are MOST of the "Cabal" people also jewish?
Is suspect yes, but cannot prove it.
I can look at the fact that 2% of Americans are jewish, but they have are 80% of the Biden cabinet, including Myorkas who not only is a jew holding the office that "regulates" illegal migration, but is ALSO a director of the NGO that is the top funder of those illegal immigrants.
And most of those jews are NOT the most capable people to hold such offices, so there must be some reason other than merit that got them there.
I look at the Federal Reserve, all the harm it has caused, and find out that it was formed mostly by jews and non-jew puppets of jews.
I look at many, many other similar situations and I can draw some conclusions.
I don't necessarily think that "Harvey the Jew" down the street in the accounting office is conspiring to do evil things, but his religion teaches him to go along with it.
And ALL jews who practice Judaism are influenced by the Talmud, no matter what their personal views are.
We only have generalizations because they TEND to be generally true in a lot of cases -- certainly, a lot more than is true of other races.
How many jews do drive-by shootings? Not many.
How many Japanese work at the central banks (other than in Japan)?
Not many.
I will not be censored just because pointing out certain things make some people uncomfortable, and there are also OTHER people who are also bad.
You attempt to claim that ONLY the "Cabal" (whomever that is, even though you don't know) are worthy of criticism is an attempt at censorship.
I reject it.