An idea, apologies if low effort but

I think that the primary definition of high or low effort is not in the crafting, but in thought and intent, the mental effort behind the post. And this idea isn't low effort, imo.

To add some thought to this: when Q was posting, anons got nudged and directed in real time to look at this or that rabbit hole and dig and expose and travel.

In the Post-Q awakening, our community is comprised not only of OG aka active anons, but newcomers who found out about Q after Q stopped posting, etc.

Apart from the natural tide and flow of information coming across GAW board, I think that having some opportunities for newcomers (and old, for that matter) to engage with 'static' aka historical rabbit holes could yield benefits.

To move this forward, as BB points out, it would require anon effort, primarily from board participants but with support and assistance from the mods.

If an ad-hoc team of interested collaborators could self-organize, then I'm sure the mods would give it a fair try.

I also like the idea of finding ways to concentrate the research, etc, and have that published in a side form that is not the GAW board, but archived elsewhere, like the superstonk example given by u/Pbamn2

Anyway, random thoughts in response to your post.

An idea, apologies if low effort but

I think that the primary definition of high or low effort is not in the crafting, but in thought and intent, the mental effort behind the post. And this idea isn't low effort, imo.

To add some thought to this: when Q was posting, anons got nudged and directed in real time to look at this or that rabbit hole and dig and expose and travel.

In the Post-Q awakening, our community is comprised not only of OG aka active anons, but newcomers who found out about Q after Q stopped posting, etc.

Apart from the natural tide and flow of information coming across GAW board, I think that having some opportunities for newcomers (and old, for that matter) to engage with 'static' aka historical rabbit holes.

To move this forward, as BB points out, it would require anon effort, primarily from board participants but with support and assistance from the mods.

If an ad-hoc team of interested collaborators could self-organize, then I'm sure the mods would give it a fair try.

I also like the idea of finding ways to concentrate the research, etc, and have that published in a side form that is not the GAW board, but archived elsewhere, like the superstonk example given by u/Pbamn2

Anyway, random thoughts in response to your post.