There are different factions that have been warring silently for control of the "sheep."

There is evidence of different factions within the PTB. However, the evidence suggests this fractionation is always minimal, and is never at odds with the larger control structure. My investigation suggests that the control structure is both an Aristocracy (intermarried families, all cousins, without substantial genetic deviation for millennia) and a Meritocracy (the strong rule).

You can find evidence of the meritocratic nature within the Aristocracy all over the place. The Rothschilds were at odds with the Rockefellers. The Morgans were at odds with them both at various times. The Astor, Guggenheim, Straus assassination was a power play, but there is no reason to think these families were truly at odds in the larger scheme. Indeed, there is nothing but evidence that suggests they were working towards the same goal with only minor deviation within the larger family group (that in this case resulted in a few untimely deaths).

There is a larger scheme which can be labeled as "secret control of the world." That label is a bit too loose, but I'll go with it for now. Within that scheme there is some wiggle room for personal advantage. Think of it like the Highlander movie series, or numerous other such works of "fiction" with a similar theme. There is a secret group that is "in the know." That group controls all the power in the world, and they act together. They do not substantially deviate from "The Plan" (of the creation of Utopia). But how The Plan is accomplished in some of the smaller details has this wiggle room.

While you can find stuff like this, where the Hunts "appear to have feuded with the Banker families" there is FAR MORE evidence that they were in collusion with them, working towards a common goal. The "competition" you see helps to hide the structure, making it seem like "warring factions," like these entities are truly at odds, when it is instead more like "gentlemen's bets," Oftentimes people die within these "faction wars," sometimes even the gentlemen themselves, like Highlander. That doesn't in any way suggest a substantial deviation from The Plan. It is more like "children being allowed to play."

There are different factions that have been warring silently for control of the "sheep."

There is evidence of different factions within the PTB. However, the evidence suggests this fractionation is always minimal, and is never at odds with the larger control structure. My investigation suggests that the control structure is both an Aristocracy (intermarried families, all cousins, without substantial genetic deviation for millennia) and a Meritocracy (the strong rule).

You can find evidence of the meritocratic nature within the Aristocracy all over the place. The Rothschilds were at odds with the Rockefellers. The Morgans were at odds with them both at various times. The Astor, Guggenheim, Straus assassination was a power play, but there is no reason to think these families were truly at odds in the larger scheme. Indeed, there is nothing but evidence that suggests they were working towards the same goal with only minor deviation within the larger family group (that in this case resulted in a few untimely deaths).

There is a larger scheme which can be labeled as "secret control of the world." That label is a bit too loose, but I'll go with it for now. Within that scheme there is some wiggle room for personal advantage. Think of it like the Highlander movie series, or numerous other such works of "fiction" with a similar theme. There is a secret group that is "in the know." That group controls all the power in the world, and they act together. They do not substantially deviate from "The Plan" (of the creation of Utopia). But how The Plan is accomplished in some of the smaller details has this wiggle room.

While you can find stuff like this, where the Hunts "appear to have feuded with the Banker families" there is FAR MORE evidence that they were in collusion with them, working towards a common goal. The "competition" you see helps to hide the structure, making it seem like "warring factions" when it is instead more like "gentlemen's bets," Oftentimes people die within these "faction wars," sometimes even the gentlemen themselves, like Highlander. That doesn't in any way suggest a substantial deviation from The Plan. It is more like "children being allowed to play."

There are different factions that have been warring silently for control of the "sheep."

There is evidence of different factions within the PTB. However, the evidence suggests this fractionation is always minimal, and is never at odds with the larger control structure. My investigation suggests that the control structure is both an Aristocracy (intermarried families, all cousins, without substantial genetic deviation for millennia) and a Meritocracy (the strong rule).

You can find evidence of the meritocratic nature within the Aristocracy all over the place. The Rothschilds were at odds with the Rockefellers. The Morgans were at odds with them both at various times. The Astor, Guggenheim, Straus assassination was a power play, but there is no reason to think these families were truly at odds in the larger scheme. Indeed, there is nothing but evidence that suggests they were working towards the same goal with only minor deviation within the larger family group (that in this case resulted in a few untimely deaths).

There is a larger scheme which can be labeled as "secret control of the world." That label is a bit too loose, but I'll go with it for now. Within that scheme there is some wiggle room for personal advantage. Think of it like the Highlander movie series, or numerous other such works of "fiction" with a similar theme. There is a secret group that is "in the know." That group controls all the power in the world, and they act together. They do not substantially deviate from "The Plan" (of the creation of Utopia). But how The Plan is accomplished in some of the smaller details has this wiggle room.

While you can find stuff like this, where the Hunts "appear to have feuded with the Banker families" there is FAR MORE evidence that they were in collusion with them, working towards a common goal. The "competition" you see helps to hide the structure, making it seem like "warring factions" when it is instead more like "gentlemen's bets" (where oftentimes people die, sometimes even the gentlemen themselves, like Highlander).

There are different factions that have been warring silently for control of the "sheep."

There is evidence of different factions within the PTB. However, the evidence suggests this fractionation is always minimal, and is never at odds with the larger control structure. My investigation suggests that the control structure is both an Aristocracy (intermarried families, all cousins, without substantial genetic deviation for millennia) and a Meritocracy (the strong rule).

You can find evidence of the meritocratic nature within the Aristocracy all over the place. The Rothschilds were at odds with the Rockefellers. The Morgans were at odds with them both at various times. The Astor, Guggenheim, Straus assassination was a power play, but there is no reason to think these families were truly at odds in the larger scheme. Indeed, there is nothing but evidence that suggests they were working towards the same goal with only minor deviation within the larger family group (that in this case resulted in a few untimely deaths).

There is a larger scheme which can be labeled as "secret control of the world." That label is a bit too loose, but I'll go with it for now. Within that scheme there is some wiggle room for personal advantage. Think of it like the Highlander movie series, or numerous other such works of "fiction" with a similar theme: there is a secret group that is "in the know." That group controls all the power together. They do not substantially deviate from "The Plan" (of the creation of Utopia). But how The Plan is accomplished in some of the smaller details has this wiggle room.

While you can find stuff like this, where the Hunts "appear to have feuded with the Banker families" there is FAR MORE evidence that they were in collusion with them, working towards a common goal. The "competition" you see helps to hide the structure, making it seem like "warring factions" when it is instead more like "gentlemen's bets" (where oftentimes people die, sometimes even the gentlemen themselves, like Highlander).