He didn't say the case was overturned. He said it was the 5th time in this case he was overturned.

My sense of overturned is a big reversal, not just a clarification or narrowing. Maybe I'm wrong.

The judgment wasn't overturned. The bond was lowered. I don't think Engoron ever had anything to do with the bond.

As for the statute of limitations - he was referring to when he appealed on grounds of statutes of limitation. They were going after him for stuff as far back as 2011. The appeals court said they could only go back to 2014.

Trump said Engoron did not abide by this which is incorrect

Engoron said he can consider evidence from 2011, and that the statute of limitations doesn't effect evidence if it's used to help prove future issues inside of the statute of limitations. It will be yet another grounds for appeal.

Right pre 2014 evidence and testimony had to be connected to post 2014 charges to be allowed.

I'm pretty sure Trump tried to sue Engoron over this issue. The lawsuit was dropped with prejudice.

He didn't say the case was overturned. He said it was the 5th time in this case he was overturned.

My sense of overturned is a big reversal, not just a clarification or narrowing. Maybe I'm wrong.

The judgment wasn't overturned. The bond was lowered. I don't think Engoron ever had anything to do with the bond.

As for the statute of limitations - he was referring to when he appealed on grounds of statutes of limitation. They were going after him for stuff as far back as 2011. The appeals court said they could only go back to 2014.

Trump said Engoron did not abide by this which is incorrect

Engoron said he can consider evidence from 2011, and that the statute of limitations doesn't effect evidence if it's used to help prove future issues inside of the statute of limitations. It will be yet another grounds for appeal.

I'm pretty sure Trump tried to sue Engoron over this issue. The lawsuit was dropped with prejudice.