The antiquated and obsolete 1600's English dialect has nothing to do with the original Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek languages in the manuscripts. This dialect obscures the meaning of the text. I love Trump, but the NKJV would have been a better choice.

I'll probably be blasted for this post. But the languages used in the manuscripts were in the dialect of the common people. Why introduce obsolete English verbiage that has nothing to do with the original writings?

The antiquated and obsolete 1600's English dialect has nothing to do with the original Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek languages in the manuscripts. This dialect obscures the meaning of the text. I love Trump, but the NKJV would have been a better choice.