Yeah, current “proofs” seem like they might better be called a nice potential evidence of an action possibly being involved with the operation. May I suggest the term, “Possible Qction?”?

To me, the biggest current signatories of action are 13/17s in significant prominence of different comms, and the biggest proofs were tippytop and Trump tweets with subject matter at linked deltas after q-posts while active.

The point of “proofs” was to prove that Q was legit, not to prove that events are tied to operational execution. What are the thoughts on the suggested term?

As far as “double meanings exist” and “disinformation is necessary”, agreed. They are the “the kingdom of heaven is within” or “render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s” of Q.

I’m guilty of using, and probably misusing, most of them, but they’re definitely all misused more than properly used.

Yeah, current “proofs” seem like they might better be called a nice potential evidence of an action possibly being involved with the operation. May I suggest the term, “Possible Qction?”?

To me, the biggest current signatories of action are 13/17s in significant prominence of different comms, and the biggest proofs were tippytop and Trump tweets with subject matter at linked deltas after q-posts while active.

The point of “proofs” was to prove that Q was legit, not to prove that events are tied to operational execution. What are the thoughts on the suggested term?

As far as “double meanings exist” and “disinformation is necessary”, agreed. They are the “the kingdom of heaven is within” or “render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s” of Q.

Guilty of using, and probably misusing, most of them, but they’re definitely all misused more than properly used.

Yeah, Any current “proof” might be a nice coincidental evidence of an action possibly being part of the plan.

To me, the biggest current signatories of action are 13/17s in significant prominence of different comms, and the biggest proofs were tippytop and Trump tweets with subject matter at linked deltas after q-posts while active.

The point of proofs was to prove that Q was legit, not to prove that events are tied to operational execution.

“double meanings exist” and “disinformation is necessary” are the “the kingdom of heaven is within” or “render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s” of Q.

Guilty of using, and probably misusing, most of them, but they’re definitely all misused more than properly used.

“double meanings exist” and “disinformation is necessary” are the “the kingdom of heaven is within” or “render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s” of Q.

Guilty of using, and probably misusing, most of them, but they’re definitely all misused more than properly used.

“double meanings exist” and “disinformation is necessary” are the “the kingdom of heaven is within” or “render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s” of Q.

Guilty of using, and probably misusing, most of them, but they’re definitely both misused more than properly used.

“double meanings exist” is the “the kingdom of heaven is within” or “render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s” of Q.

Guilty of using, and probably misusing, both, but they’re definitely both misused more than properly used.