ALL images of a so-called "virus" (or "variant" of a virus) are photos taken by electron microscopes.
IOW, they are NOT what most people think of either as photos of an actual thing that exists, nor are they taken by a regular microscope that allows you to see small things, magnified.
This is the misunderstanding people have, and this is why they do not understand the scam of virology.
Kary Mullis (inventor of PCR) had absolute contempt for Tony Fauci, and said that Fauci is so stupid that he thinks you can look into an electron microscope and see something.
Most people probably think that, too. It likely comes from our experiences as students when we looked into a microscope in science class to see very small stuff. Yes, those microscopes are like a powerful magnifying glass to allow us to see real things that we can't see with the naked eye.
But that is NOT how electron microscopes work.
In the case of a so-called "virus," this is what they do to produce the images you are looking for:
(1) They take a fluid sample, usually from a human, that they want to study.
(2) They filter to remove large particles.
(3) They then mix it with chemicals, some of which are anti-biotics that are specifically toxic to kidney cells.
(4) They then spread this mixture (which includes the original fluid to be studied, but by now also includes a lot more stuff) onto "vero" cells, which is a fancy word for monkey kidney cells.
THIS PROCESS is what they fraudulently call "isolating the virus." But you will notice that there was nothing removed from the original bodily fluid, other than a crude filtering of larger particles. Nothing was REALLY isolated, and certainly never purified (which is required to claim it is "isolated"). Instead, all sorts of things were added to it, which created a mixture of stuff.
This is the ONLY method used to study ALL viruses. This method was created in the 1950's, and is still used today. There is no other process.
(5) Next, they set this mixture aside for a few days, and they come back to see that the vero cells have died.
(6) At this point, they say, "Ah ha! There was a virus in the fluid sample that killed the vero cells, so we know we have a virus here!"
(7) But they never stop to consider the possibility that the monkey kidney cells died because of the anti-biotics that were added to the mixture, since these anti-biotics are specifically toxic to kidney cells (human or monkey).
IOW, there is ZERO PROOF of the existence of virus ... AT ALL. It is merely a CLAIM because the vero cells died.
Now, at this point ... they want to "take a picture" of the "virus."
(8) Next, they freeze this mixture of stuff to very low temperatures (which potentially changes the chemical structure of it).
(9) Then, they add dyes to it.
(10) Then ... and only then ... do they put it into an electron microscope, which zaps electrons at it, creating an image that you can see, and looks similar to a photograph.
But it is not a photograph of a "virus" that was inside of a human.
It is an electron image of a mixture of stuff that has gone through all these steps.
When the vero cells are poisoned, they eject exosomes as part of the process of dying. These are seen in the images as "corona spikes," or even falsely claimed to be the "spike protein."
So ...
The images you seek are not images of a virus or variants. They are nothing more than images of the result of a fake virology process that never extracted a virus to put into a microscope to look at in the first place.
It is merely the result of creating a Frankenstein mixture of soup, freezing it, coloring it, and then zapping it with electrons.
That is ... IF ... the image is really from an electron microscope at all.
MOST of what you see in books and on the internet are actually just artist renderings.
I can do that, too, as "proof" that unicorns are real.
Here ya go ...
As for the so-called "variants," none of them exist as real things in the real world.
They are ALL created by computer simulation, have the computer program piece together fragments of DNA/RNA, and then comparing them to the results of a fradulent PCR "test" (which creates new DNA/RNA fragments as a byproduct of the process), and claiming that they "found" a new variant.
This is why they keep coming up with new stuff, and then the hubub dies down after a few days.
Delta? Omicron (i.e. moronic)? Bird Flu superduper Covid variant?
The possibilities are endless ... because they don't have to provide any actual proof from the real world.
Ya know ... like that pesky "science" stuff.
ALL images of a so-called "virus" (or "variant" of a virus) are photos taken by electron microscopes.
IOW, they are NOT what most people think of either as photos of an actual thing that exists, nor are they taken by a regular microscope that allows you to see small things, magnified.
This is the misunderstanding people have, and this is why they do not understand the scam of virology.
Kary Mullis (inventor of PCR) had absolute contempt for Tony Fauci, and said that Fauci is so stupid that he thinks you can look into an electron microscope and see something.
Most people probably think that, too. It likely comes from our experiences as students when we looked into a microscope in science class to see very small stuff. Yes, those microscopes are like a powerful magnifying glass to allow us to see real things that we can't see with the naked eye.
But that is NOT how electron microscopes work.
In the case of a so-called "virus," this is what they do to produce the images you are looking for:
(1) They take a fluid sample, usually from a human, that they want to study.
(2) They filter to remove large particles.
(3) They then mix it with chemicals, some of which are anti-biotics that are specifically toxic to kidney cells.
(4) They then spread this mixture (which includes the original fluid to be studied, but by now also includes a lot more stuff) onto "vero" cells, which is a fancy word for monkey kidney cells.
THIS PROCESS is what they fraudulently call "isolating the virus." But you will notice that there was nothing removed from the original bodily fluid, other then a crude filtering of larger particles. Nothing was REALLY isolated, and certainly never purified (which is required to claim it is "isolated"). Instead, all sorts of things were added to it, which created a mixture of stuff.
This is the ONLY method used to study ALL viruses. This method was created in the 1950's, and is still used today. There is no other process.
(5) Next, they set this mixture aside for a few days, and they come back to see that the vero cells have died.
(6) At this point, they say, "Ah ha! There was a virus in the fluid sample that killed the vero cells, so we know we have a virus here!"
(7) But they never stop to consider the possibility that the monkey kidney cells died because of the anti-biotics that were added to the mixture, since these anti-biotics are specifically toxic to kidney cells (human or monkey).
IOW, there is ZERO PROOF of the existence of virus ... AT ALL. It is merely a CLAIM because the vero cells died.
Now, at this point ... they want to "take a picture" of the "virus."
(8) Next, they freeze this mixture of stuff to very low temperatures (which potentially changes the chemical structure of it).
(9) Then, they add dyes to it.
(10) Then ... and only then ... do they put it into an electron microscope, which zaps electrons at it, creating an image that you can see, and looks similar to a photograph.
But it is not a photograph of a "virus" that was inside of a human.
It is an electron image of a mixture of stuff that has gone through all these steps.
When the vero cells are poisoned, they eject exosomes as part of the process of dying. These are seen in the images as "corona spikes," or even falsely claimed to be the "spike protein."
So ...
The images you seek are not images of a virus or variants. They are nothing more than images of the result of a fake virology process that never extracted a virus to put into a microscope to look at in the first place.
It is merely the result of creating a Frankenstein mixture of soup, freezing it, coloring it, and then zapping it with electrons.
That is ... IF ... the image is really from an electron microscope at all.
MOST of what you see in books and on the internet are actually just artist renderings.
I can do that, too, as "proof" that unicorns are real.
Here ya go ...
As for the so-called "variants," none of them exist as real things in the real world.
They are ALL created by computer simulation, have the computer program piece together fragments of DNA/RNA, and then comparing them to the results of a fradulent PCR "test" (which creates new DNA/RNA fragments as a byproduct of the process), and claiming that they "found" a new variant.
This is why they keep coming up with new stuff, and then the hubub dies down after a few days.
Delta? Omicron (i.e. moronic)? Bird Flu superduper Covid variant?
The possibilities are endless ... because they don't have to provide any actual proof from the real world.
Ya know ... like that pesky "science" stuff.
ALL images of a so-called "virus" (or "variant" of a virus) are photos taken by electron microscopes.
IOW, they are NOT what most people think of either as photos of an actual thing that exists, nor are they taken by a regular microscope that allows you to see small things, magnified.
This is the misunderstanding people have, and this is why they do not understand the scam of virology.
Kary Mullis (inventor of PCR) had absolute contempt for Tony Fauci, and said that Fauci is so stupid that he thinks you can look into an electron microscope and see something.
Most people probably think that, too. It likely comes from our experiences as students when we looked into a microscope in science class to see very small stuff. Yes, those microscopes are like a powerful magnifying glass to allow us to see real things that we can't see with the naked eye.
But that is NOT how electron microscopes work.
In the case of a so-called "virus," this is what they do to produce the images you are looking for:
(1) They take a fluid sample, usually from a human, that they want to study.
(2) They filter to remove large particles.
(3) They then mix it with chemicals, some of which are anti-biotics that are specifically toxic to kidney cells.
(4) They then spread this mixture (which includes the original fluid to be studied, but by now also includes a lot more stuff) onto "vero" cells, which is a fancy word for monkey kidney cells.
THIS PROCESS is what they fraudulently call "isolating the virus." But you will notice that there was nothing removed from the original bodily fluid, other then a crude filtering of larger particles. Nothing was REALLY isolated, and certainly never purified (which is required to claim it is "isolated"). Instead, all sorts of things were added to it, which created a mixture of stuff.
This is the ONLY method used to study ALL viruses. This method was created in the 1950's, and is still used today. There is no other process.
(5) Next, they set this mixture aside for a few days, and they come back to see that the vero cells have died.
(6) At this point, they say, "Ah ha! There was a virus in the fluid sample that killed the vero cells, so we know we have a virus here!"
(7) But they never stop to consider the possibility that the monkey kidney cells died because of the anti-biotics that were added to the mixture, since these anti-biotics are specifically toxic to kidney cells (human or monkey).
IOW, there is ZERO PROOF of the existence of virus ... AT ALL. It is merely a CLAIM because the vero cells died.
Now, at this point ... they want to "take a picture" of the "virus."
(8) Next, they freeze this mixture of stuff to very low temperatures (which potentially changes the chemical structure of it).
(9) Then, they add dyes to it.
(10) Then ... and only then ... do they put it into an electron microscope, which zaps electrons at it, creating an image that you can see, and looks similar to a photograph.
But it is not a photograph of a "virus" that was inside of a human.
It is an electron image of a mixture of stuff that has gone through all these steps.
When the vero cells are poisoned, they eject exosomes as part of the process of dying. These are seen in the images as "corona spikes," or even falsely claimed to be the "spike protein."
So ...
The images you seek are not images of a virus or variants. They are nothing more than images of the result of a fake virology process that never extracted a virus to put into a microscope to look at in the first place.
It is merely the result of creating a Frankenstein mixture of soup, freezing it, coloring it, and then zapping it with electrons.
That is ... IF ... the image is really from an electron microscope at all.
MOST of what you see in books and on the internet are actually just artist renderings.
I can do that, too, as "proof" that unicorns are real.
Here ya go ...
ALL images of a so-called "virus" (or "variant" of a virus) are photos taken by electron microscopes.
IOW, they are NOT what most people think of either as photos of an actual thing that exists, nor are they taken by a regular microscope that allows you to see small things, magnified.
This is the misunderstanding people have, and this is why they do not understand the scam of virology.
Kary Mullis (inventor of PCR) had absolute contempt for Tony Fauci, and said that Fauci is so stupid that he thinks you can look into an electron microscope and see something.
Most people probably think that, too. It likely comes from our experiences as students when we looked into a microscope in science class to see very small stuff. Yes, those microscopes are like a powerful magnifying glass to allow us to see real things that we can't see with the naked eye.
But that is NOT how electron microscopes work.
In the case of a so-called "virus," this is what they do to produce the images you are looking for:
(1) They take a fluid sample, usually from a human, that they want to study.
(2) They filter to remove large particles.
(3) They then mix it with chemicals, some of which are anti-biotics that are specifically toxic to kidney cells.
(4) They then spread this mixture (which includes the original fluid to be studied, but by now also includes a lot more stuff) onto "vero" cells, which is a fancy word for monkey kidney cells.
THIS PROCESS is what they fraudulently call "isolating the virus." But you will notice that there was nothing removed from the original bodily fluid, other then a crude filtering of larger particles. Nothing was REALLY isolated, and certainly never purified (which is required to claim it is "isolated"). Instead, all sorts of things were added to it, which created a mixture of stuff.
This is the ONLY method used to study ALL viruses. This method was created in the 1950's, and is still used today. There is no other process.
(5) Next, they set this mixture aside for a few days, and they come back to see that the vero cells have died.
(6) At this point, they say, "Ah ha! There was a virus in the fluid sample that killed the vero cells, so we know we have a virus here!"
(7) But they never stop to consider the possibility that the monkey kidney cells died because of the anti-biotics that were added to the mixture, since these anti-biotics are specifically toxic to kidney cells (human or monkey). IOW, there is ZERO PROOF of the existence of virus ... AT ALL. It is merely a CLAIM because the vero cells died.
Now, at this point ... they want to "take a picture" of the "virus."
(8) Next, they freeze this mixture of stuff to very low temperatures (which potentially changes the chemical structure of it).
(9) Then, they add dyes to it.
(10) Then ... and only then ... do they put it into an electron microscope, which zaps electrons at it, creating an image that you can see, and looks similar to a photograph.
But it is not a photograph of a "virus" that was inside of a human.
It is an electron image of a mixture of stuff that has gone through all these steps.
When the vero cells are poisoned, they eject exosomes as part of the process of dying. These are seen in the images as "corona spikes," or even falsely claimed to be the "spike protein."
So ...
The images you seek are not images of a virus or variants. They are nothing more than images of the result of a fake virology process that never extracted a virus to put into a microscope to look at in the first place.
It is merely the result of creating a Frankenstein mixture of soup, freezing it, coloring it, and then zapping it with electrons.
That is ... IF ... the image is really from an electron microscope at all.
MOST of what you see in books and on the internet are actually just artist renderings.
I can do that, too, as "proof" that unicorns are real.
Here ya go ...
ALL images of a so-called "virus" (or "variant" of a virus) are photos taken by electron microscopes.
IOW, they are NOT what most people think of either as photos of an actual thing that exists, nor are they taken by a regular microscope that allows you to see small things, magnified.
This is the misunderstanding people have, and this is why they do not understand the scam of virology.
Kary Mullis (inventor of PCR) had absolute contempt for Tony Fauci, and said that Fauci is so stupid that he thinks you can look into an electron microscope and see something.
Most people probably think that, too. It likely comes from our experiences as students when we looked into a microscope in science class to see very small stuff. Yes, those microscopes are like a powerful magnifying glass to allow us to see real things that we can't see with the naked eye.
But that is NOT how electron microscopes work.
In the case of a so-called "virus," this is what they do to produce the images you are looking for:
(1) They take a fluid sample, usually from a human, that they want to study.
(2) They filter to remove large particles.
(3) They then mix it with chemicals, some of which are anti-biotics that are specifically toxic to kidney cells.
(4) They then spread this mixture (which includes the original fluid to be studied, but by now also includes a lot more stuff) onto "vero" cells, which is a fancy word for monkey kidney cells.
THIS PROCESS is what they fraudulently call "isolating the virus." But you will notice that there was nothing removed from the original bodily fluid, other then a crude filtering of larger particles. Nothing was REALLY isolated, and certainly never purified (which is required to claim it is "isolated"). Instead, all sorts of things were added to it, which created a mixture of stuff.
(5) They set this mixture aside for a few days, and they come back to see that the vero cells have died.
(6) At this point, they say, "Ah ha! There was a virus in the fluid sample that killed the vero cells, so we know we have a virus here!"
(7) But they never stop to consider the possibility that the monkey kidney cells died because of the anti-biotics that were added to the mixture, since these anti-biotics are specifically toxic to kidney cells (human or monkey). IOW, there is ZERO PROOF of the existence of virus ... AT ALL. It is merely a CLAIM because the vero cells died.
Now, at this point ... they want to "take a picture" of the "virus."
(8) Next, they freeze this mixture of stuff to very low temperatures (which potentially changes the chemical structure of it).
(9) Then, they add dyes to it.
(10) Then ... and only then ... do they put it into an electron microscope, which zaps electrons at it, creating an image that you can see, and looks similar to a photograph.
But it is not a photograph of a "virus" that was inside of a human.
It is an electron image of a mixture of stuff that has gone through all these steps.
When the vero cells are poisoned, they eject exosomes as part of the process of dying. These are seen in the images as "corona spikes," or even falsely claimed to be the "spike protein."
So ...
The images you seek are not images of a virus or variants. They are nothing more than images of the result of a fake virology process that never extracted a virus to put into a microscope to look at in the first place.
It is merely the result of creating a Frankenstein mixture of soup, freezing it, coloring it, and then zapping it with electrons.
That is ... IF ... the image is really from an electron microscope at all.
MOST of what you see in books and on the internet are actually just artist renderings.
I can do that, too, as "proof" that unicorns are real.
Here ya go ...
ALL images of a so-called "virus" (or "variant" of a virus) are photos taken by electron microscopes.
IOW, they are NOT what most people think of either as photos of an actual thing that exists, nor are they taken by a regular microscope that allows you to see small things, magnified.
This is the misunderstanding people have, and this is why they do not understand the scam of virology.
Kary Mullis (inventor of PCR) had absolute contempt for Tony Fauci, and said that Fauci is so stupid that he thinks you can look into an electron microscope and see something.
Most people probably think that, too. It likely comes from our experiences as students when we looked into a microscope in science class to see very small stuff. Yes, those microscopes are like a powerful magnifying glass to allow us to see real things that we can't see with the naked eye.
But that is NOT how electron microscopes work.
In the case of a so-called "virus," this is what they do to produce the images you are looking for:
(1) They take a fluid sample, usually from a human, that they want to study.
(2) They filter to remove large particles.
(3) They then mix it with chemicals, some of which are anti-biotics that are specifically toxic to kidney cells.
(4) They then spread this mixture (which includes the original fluid to be studied, but by now alos includes a lot more stuff) onto "vero" cells, which is a fancy word for monkey kidney cells. THIS PROCESS is what they fraudulently call "isolating the virus." But you will notice that there was nothing removed from the original bodily fluid, other then a crude filtering of larger particles. Nothing was REALLY isolated, and certainly never purified (which is required to claim it is "isolated"). Instead, all sorts of things were added to it, which created a mixture of stuff.
(5) They set this mixture aside for a few days, and they come back to see that the vero cells have died.
(6) At this point, they say, "Ah ha! There was a virus in the fluid sample that killed the vero cells, so we know we have a virus here!"
(7) But they never stop to consider the possibility that the monkey kidney cells died because of the anti-biotics that were added to the mixture, since these anti-biotics are specifically toxic to kidney cells (human or monkey). IOW, there is ZERO PROOF of the existence of virus ... AT ALL. It is merely a CLAIM because the vero cells died.
Now, at this point ... they want to "take a picture" of the "virus."
(8) Next, they freeze this mixture of stuff to very low temperatures (which potentially changes the chemical structure of it).
(9) Then, they add dyes to it.
(10) Then ... and only then ... do they put it into an electron microscope, which zaps electrons at it, creating an image that you can see, and looks similar to a photograph.
But it is not a photograph of a "virus" that was inside of a human.
It is an electron image of a mixture of stuff that has gone through all these steps.
When the vero cells are poisoned, they eject exosomes as part of the process of dying. These are seen in the images as "corona spikes," or even falsely claimed to be the "spike protein."
So ...
The images you seek are not images of a virus or variants. They are nothing more than images of the result of a fake virology process that never extracted a virus to put into a microscope to look at in the first place.
It is merely the result of creating a Frankenstein mixture of soup, freezing it, coloring it, and then zapping it with electrons.
That is ... IF ... the image is really from an electron microscope at all.
MOST of what you see in books and on the internet are actually just artist renderings.
I can do that, too, as "proof" that unicorns are real.
Here ya go ...