This may be a flimsy theory but I was just thinking, what if "standing" is just a red herring?

Is it possible that due to the influence of a foreign power in this case, the issue isn't that the plaintiffs in the case lack standing, but that the courts themselves lack jurisdiction?

Q always said the military was the only way--is it possible that military courts are the only way too when election fraud involves foreign actors?

This may be a flimsy theory but I was just thinking, what if "standing" is just a red herring? Is it possible that due to the influence of a foreign power in this case, the issue isn't that the plaintiffs in the case lack standing, but that the courts themselves lack jurisdiction? Q always said the military was the only way--is it possible that military courts are the only way too when election fraud involves foreign actors?

This may be a flimsy theory but I was just thinking, what if "standing" is just a red herring?

Is it possible that due to the influence of a foreign power in this case, the issue isn't that the plaintiff's in the case lack standing, but that the courts themselves lack jurisdiction?

Q always said the military was the only way--is it possible that military courts are the only way too when election fraud involves foreign actors?