1
AndersonAnon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why is that? I know nothing about him/her/them.

2
AndersonAnon 2 points ago +2 / -0

I understand that completely, and that is precisely my concern. My interest in collecting all works relating to The Great Awakening, even the false leads, is due to the fact that my training is primarily in the dissemination of text; I have been through many intellectual crawlspaces full of spiders to recover mere breadcrumbs.

Some of the most important texts to early Christianity are Roman denouncements of Christians, pseudepigraphical addendums written by frauds to otherwise in-tact Christian works, etc - the reason for the significance is that we can then archaeologically determine what the social perception of early Christians was, what elements of their beliefs were most intensely attacked, and what beliefs of the day attempted to assert themselves into a new religion.

In the same way, the absolutely wrong Q-related works are extremely important to documenting the system.

1
AndersonAnon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where would I find this series?

1
AndersonAnon 1 point ago +1 / -0

I understand this completely, but with a caveat - there is a reason an Oxford-educated mathematician would gravitate toward a fully compiled book in liu of fragmentation. As the world is filled with a wealth of types of "thinkers," for lack of a better term, curated chapters do much of the work for me and match my style of thinking in the best possible way.

I have downloaded Geddes' book and will begin reading it this week, if all goes well.

3
AndersonAnon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you for the clarification. I have found Rumble and will be viewing both of these today.

2
AndersonAnon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do you know where I can find this book? Can you find out?