I included some statistics on this one. Odds of being random are vanishingly small.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRGrpkEV/qproof-trump-and-q-arent-gonna-h/
He may have been; don't count on it anymore. Back in 2015 you didn't get canceled for associating with Trump.
I'd love to know as well.
This is one of the strongest Trump -> Q proofs out there. Also note it happened after the election was "lost". Trump tweeted exactly 4 weeks apart from Q's last post, within 10 seconds of the timestamp, on the same topic.
Q tweeted YouTube music video about the stuff the country has put up with this year, along with supporters for Trump, and some election fraud snippets. This was set to Dee Snider's "We're Not Gonna Take It", implying that our country wasn't going to take these abuses anymore.
Trump's tweet included the phrase "Our Country has had enough, they won’t take it anymore!". The song also contains the line "We're not gonna take it anymore!" at the end of the chorus.
So that's a tweet that matches the timestamp at a meaningful delta that is on the precise same topic with a corresponding phrase.
Additionally the timestamp in question was 17:05:5x EST, which contains 17 (17th Letter of the alphabet is Q) and "5:5" which is code, used extensively by Q, for receiving a transmission loud and clear, or as stated in Trump's tweet "We hear you".
Interestingly enough, the video Q referenced was uploaded at 17:55 EST, containing both the 17 and the 55 (and was the only video the channel had uploaded at the time).
Also interestingly, Trump's family, including him, sang the "We Not Gonna Take It" song on stage with Dee Snider at a charity event on Sep. 27, 2015. Trump's tweet here was 5 years, 3 months, and 9 full days later. 5 + 3 + 9 = 17 (this part could be a coincidence, but I'll take it).
Probability estimate of this occurring randomly:
Probability is hard to estimate for things like topics, since they are somewhat subjective, but here's a shot.
Note this is based on the timing and topics only, not counting the timing being on a 5:5, nor the timing of when the video posted, nor any of the other coincidences since they're even harder to quantify or not fully independent.
Timing chance:
About 524 tweets in the days between Q's post and January 6th.
30 possible seconds in which to hit a week-aligned delta within 10 seconds of those 4 weeks
~1.283% chance of a tweet randomly hitting that delta, using a hypergeometric distribution, assuming Trump tweets during certain portions of the day (which is approximately true).
Topic chance:
Trump has 2 tweets total with "taking it" in this sense as a topic out of 23221 since Q started posting. Chance of tweeting about somebody taking it: 0.00861%
Trump has ~6 tweets total about hearing somebody out of 23221 since Q started posting. Chance of tweeting about hearing somebody: 0.0258%
Total chance: 0.000000028%, or less than a 3 in 10 billion chance of occurring randomly
(Note this assumes Trump's tweet topic is independent of the time it's posted, which isn't strictly true, but is about as good as we can estimate)
Sauce:
Q and Trump's posts: https://qagg.news/?q=%23%234953%2CP24252
Video Q linked: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1l-nR1Apj4 (Can't watch in US due to licensing issues.)
Rumble re-upload of the same video: https://rumble.com/vcfz53-were-not-gonna-take-it-stop-the-steal.html
Video of Trump family singing song with Dee Snider: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lznqdiYRsss
Very few, if any, Q supporters seem to care about March 4th, but MSM (and the Deep State) seem to.
Could they be looking at this clue from the first Q drop and be making a bad prediction?
The time on the first post is 4:44 PM which is quoting a post from 3:33 PM. This seems to be on purpose, given the chance of it happening randomly is rather small.
I don't think they'd be wrong to be suspicious of this coincidence, as it has an estimated 0.0039% chance of happening randomly.
I'm fairly certain that if this truly not random, they are misinterpreting this clue.
Moral of the story: Q supporters aren't the only ones making bad date predictions.
Probability estimate:
10/3600 chance of posting on a triple number minute 0.27% chance
4/284 chance of posting a reply at the one of these as well within the same workday 1.41% chance
Total probability: 0.0039% chance of both happening randomly