1
Cantaloupe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. not a US House Bill.

The article identifies who thought this was a good idea. They should be asked about it, and voted out if they do not support fee speech.

2
Cantaloupe 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://files.catbox.moe/y21b7j.png

It's probably being blocked.

Uploaded it somewhere else and it was blocked.

You can get around the blocks.

Why would old news be blocked? Weird.

2
Cantaloupe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Since about 70 AD

70 AD: Roman historian Cornelius Tacitus on the destruction of Jerusalem, the Temple, and the slaughter of Jews – "We are told the number of the besieged, old and young, men and women, amounted to 600,000."

135 AD: Roman historian Cassius Dio is told and records that 600,000 Jews are slaughtered when Rome finally crushes the Bar Kokhba rebellion.

18th Century: Ukrainian pogrom where ‘reliable accounts’ record that 60,000 Jews were slaughtered by Gaidmak Cossacks according to the Jewish People's Relief Committee Report of 1921, mentioned in The Slaughter of the Jews in the Ukraine in 1919, by Elias Heifetz.

1880: The New York time editorial of 27 February states that: "The war, which has for some time raged in Germany between the natives and the Jews, seems rather to increase rather than diminish in intensity…The charge is made that of the 600,000 Israelites in the empire, hardly any engage in agriculture or mercantile pursuits, but that they control trade, rule the money markets and are eating up the country with their avarice and usury

4
Cantaloupe 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why couldn't it be that we were just lied to?

It goes back to about 70 AD if you search.

https://archive.vn/cjhR1/d6c73987748124fb9fdc0c5b2e882b38aab9b368.jpgJPG

The Talmud has 600,000 characters the number of souls.

Ten essentially means God 10

10*600,000 means Devine Perfection

70 AD: Roman historian Cornelius Tacitus on the destruction of Jerusalem, the Temple, and the slaughter of Jews – "We are told the number of the besieged, old and young, men and women, amounted to 600,000."

135 AD: Roman historian Cassius Dio is told and records that 600,000 Jews are slaughtered when Rome finally crushes the Bar Kokhba rebellion.

18th Century: Ukrainian pogrom where ‘reliable accounts’ record that 60,000 Jews were slaughtered by Gaidmak Cossacks according to the Jewish People's Relief Committee Report of 1921, mentioned in The Slaughter of the Jews in the Ukraine in 1919, by Elias Heifetz.

1880: The New York time editorial of 27 February states that: "The war, which has for some time raged in Germany between the natives and the Jews, seems rather to increase rather than diminish in intensity…The charge is made that of the 600,000 Israelites in the empire, hardly any engage in agriculture or mercantile pursuits, but that they control trade, rule the money markets and are eating up the country with their avarice and usury."

3
Cantaloupe 3 points ago +3 / -0

They probably just started lying to us recently /s

We'll look at the news and see the lies.

We'll watch the Pavlovian response of the leftist, how whatever propaganda is fed to them they will just lap up.

We see how they will just turned a blind eye, turn their head away, so they don't have to see.

We'll think, how could they be so foolish?

When you can see for yourself, you've been lied to.

3
Cantaloupe 3 points ago +3 / -0

https://archive.vn/cjhR1/d6c73987748124fb9fdc0c5b2e882b38aab9b368.jpgJPG

You can find similar from the 1400s about 70AD with Nero.

It's religious 600,000 is the well of souls 10 essentially represent God 6,000,000 is Devine Perfection

https://web.archive.org/web/20090406172604/http://www.ety.com/HRP/rev/sacredsixmillion.htm

Who ran the communist uprising in Russia and Germany? Why was Antifa there? Who runs them now?

No doubt people died, in wars people do that.

1
Cantaloupe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Got Tesla and a portable diesel engine to charge it.

1
Cantaloupe 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's no standard definition of red pilled, and it's probably not worth considering. Really, who cares?

What's interesting is one more person realizing they have been lied to, a lot. One more person that broke through the propaganda.

It's interesting to hear his perspective on how some people are still in the media reality-bubble.

There are some indications he has heard other information. He may not feel free to speak, he has deep roots in California and may not feel free to leave.

1
Cantaloupe 1 point ago +1 / -0

See some of my above comments as well; I point out the flaws with just watching snippets and missing the point entirely.

1
Cantaloupe 1 point ago +1 / -0

As to Levels of Disclosure: While it's true that many organizations had hierarchical structures and systems of knowledge transmission, it's important to consider how information was shared within these groups. Some Gnostic texts, such as the Nag Hammadi library, were indeed hidden or buried, possibly to protect them from destruction by opposing religious authorities. This suggests a deliberate effort to safeguard certain teachings rather than just a pedagogical approach to knowledge dissemination.

Also the focus solely on Gnosticism is a bit off topic

Also while the speech referenced Gnosticism as an example or a case study within the broader discussion, it likely aimed to explore larger concepts such as the manipulation of language, the formation of ideological frameworks, and the dynamics of power and control in various belief systems. Therefore, if one were to attempt to frame the speech as solely centered on Gnosticism may overlook the nuanced and multifaceted nature of the arguments presented.

1
Cantaloupe 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is a well written response. It maybe the that prior reading has caused a hasty conclusion. The speaker says about 16,843 words and there is a lot of content you have not address.

Here are some of what appear to be flaws with your statements;

Selective Focus: Your argument seems to have cherry-picked specific statements from the speaker's opening arguments without addressing the entirety of the speech. They fail to acknowledge the comprehensive nature of the speaker's discourse and instead hyper-focus on a few isolated points.

Failure to Grasp Analogical Reasoning: The speaker likely used analogies and simplified explanations to convey complex concepts to a broader audience. Your argument seems to have an insistence on literal interpretations of statements like "making something out of nothing" in alchemical thinking that overlooks the symbolic and metaphorical nature of such expressions within the context of the speech.

Dismissal of Context: Your statement dismisses the speaker's interpretations as incomplete and malformed without fully engaging with the context in which these interpretations were presented. They do not consider that the speaker may have intended to provoke critical thinking or challenge conventional perspectives rather than provide exhaustive scholarly analyses.

Assumption of Closed-mindedness: Your argument accuses the speaker of starting from a position of closed-mindedness without acknowledging their own potential biases or preconceptions. They imply that the speaker's conclusions are predetermined by a belief in the inherent evil of certain ideologies, which may not be accurately inferred from the speech.

Failure to Address Core Arguments: Instead of engaging with the speaker's central arguments about the nature of Gnosticism and hermetical thinking, your argument focuses on minor points of contention and personal interpretations. They do not provide substantive counterarguments or alternative perspectives to challenge the speaker's main claims.

The speech never says "Hermetical thinking is dialectical thinking"

Essentially what does say though is 1 Dialect thinking s a method of argument involving dialogue between two or more people holding different points of view about a subject. It often involves examining and resolving contradictions or opposing ideas to arrive at a deeper understanding or truth.

2 Hermetic thinking: This refers to the philosophical and esoteric traditions attributed encompasses various spiritual, alchemical, and mystical teachings aimed at understanding the nature of reality, the divine, and the self.

3 Alchemical thinking hat aims to transform base metals into gold and achieve spiritual enlightenment or immortality. Alchemical thinking involves symbolic interpretation, experimentation, and the pursuit of hidden truths or mysteries.

By stating that "the dialectic is hermetic thinking, which is alchemical thinking he means process of dialectical reasoning shares similarities with the philosophical and mystical approaches found in Hermeticism and alchemy. This could imply that dialectical reasoning involves uncovering deeper truths, resolving contradictions, and transforming understanding, akin to the goals of Hermeticism and alchemy.

1
Cantaloupe 1 point ago +1 / -0

What do you propose that is better?

Where is the proof?

2
Cantaloupe 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's a monopoly. That is not a free market. It's literally rent seeking via artificial scarcity.

2
Cantaloupe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do most people buy a house in cash or by a loan and paying interest?

If the price of the house is more do you pay more interest?

What they did is to make people pay more interest without it looking like they made people pay more interest.

Or even worse, they just rent the house. Like a loan you can never pay off.

It's simplest to explain it as Usury, that is a term people find understandable and know is immoral

3
Cantaloupe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unfortunately the entirety has to be watched to be understood. At about 19.22 you start to get a view

3
Cantaloupe 3 points ago +3 / -0

And that is how the knowledge remains secret.

A group wants power, they paint a picture of utopia. Then they tell you all you know is incorrect. Then they tell you to replace your idea of reality with whatever they tell you. Then your reality is their words. To you, they have become wizards, changing reality with words. They do this repeatedly, and people fall for it every time. Communism, Covid, Climate, etc It is a way to become powerful, hence attractive to psychopaths. And that is why the Globalist use it, because they're crazy.

To resist it some must understand it, and not become enthralled with power.

In Gnostic philosophy, abstraction, negation, and concretion are three steps in the process of gaining knowledge or understanding something. Abstraction refers to the act of separating the essential features of an object from its physical form. It is the process of generalizing or distilling down to the core essence. Negation involves denying or rejecting everything that is not part of the essential nature of the object. This helps to clear away any misconceptions or false beliefs about the object. Concretion then takes place when these two processes have been completed. It is the act of reuniting the abstracted essence with concrete reality, bringing it back into existence as a real thing. Together, these three steps can lead to a deeper understanding of the true nature of things and help to achieve spiritual enlightenment.

1
Cantaloupe 1 point ago +1 / -0

This parent exemplifies it https://youtu.be/dBRJorDjG88

At 27.50 an Inversion of Reality, taking mothers instincts to destroy the children

First video https://youtu.be/X57EnniEE-k

2
Cantaloupe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good to know. Probably it's best to keep an eye on this. It sounds like a few sources were saying it

1
Cantaloupe 1 point ago +1 / -0

The 2020 election was a military coup against Americans. It was run by the CiA, DHS, EU, World Bank, IMF. Kicked off by Obama.

Countries can be taken over just by controlling the media. And that is why everyone should use free speech media.

3
Cantaloupe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Praying for you, sorry for your loss

As one who has long understood exactly what these kill shots would do and continue to do, it's been a horror show watching people line up to die.

https://rumble.com/v27x6lz-sound-of-silencedisturbed.html

Hear my words that I might teach you Take my arms that I might reach you" But my words, like silent raindrops, fell And echoed in the wells of silence.

They knew it would kill people, they tried it before around 2009.

They are still pursuing their agenda.

Next up at some point the food and water supply will be attacked.

At some point they will likely poison the water. Probably a reverse osmosis machine may help.

The biden administration knew for seven months what would happen in the election. They are not going to cheat again unless they are stopped. If that happens then they will pursue more death. Maybe a war.

view more: Next ›