You are correct on that my friend.

Severallll on Cooper and maybe a few on the Vanderbilts, at least one or two on Gloria and I believe some about the Vanderbilt Estate.

In one of the early posts Q implies that the Rockefellers were replaced by Soros.

I respect this person for calling him out on his hypocrisy.

But calling people racist, and then saying “you’re nothing but a cracker” in the same breath?

All right then

You remind me of a known voat goat.

If you are there Maroonsaint, bless you, you sick bastard. Let TomBradysPenis be your reincarnation.

And thank you for your question. It’s one I considered myself at some point during all this.

Here’s the real answer to your question, and it is a good question, don’t apologize.

It’s because the military IS us. It’s the one branch of government that consists of real Americans like you and me.

They don’t come from establishment families, with few exceptions of course.

They’re just like us. Most of them grew up without. And they’ve been through the gauntlet to get where they are now. Do most governers, senators, and congresspeople actually go and fight for America? No. Do they literally SERVE America? No, they use America to serve their own purposes.

The military is the branch of the government that actually walks the walk. That is how they have resisted corruption.

There is that as well, I did not see that the person Greydle originally responded to was not you haha. Saying that any information would be admissible as evidence in a military tribunal.

And they may be right, still. I know the legal system, but am less familiar with the rules of Military Justice.

In any case, thank you for your response.

Can you elaborate? I think Greydle’s point is valid.

Them being stolen would not give the authorities lawful permission to go through the contents. As soon as the laptop was determined to be, say, Pelosi’s, it would need to be returned.

The fact of them being stolen alone does not give proper cause to inspect the contents.

The only loophole here would be if they did not know the owner of the stolen item, inspected its contents to determine an owner, and immediately encountered something illegal.

Then the contents could be searched and be admissible as evidence.

The global blackmail ring is a major topic, but Q is much more than that.

Hey there.

I’m new here, I was one of the ones that went to voat, but I am also a former mod from the r/ GA. If you guys ever find yourself desperately needing some help, feel free to reach out.

I appreciate you guys and what you’ve done here. I imagine the influx has been crazy, but this board is well maintained and all of you are doing a fine job.

Thank you for it.

Hey there.

I would just like to point out that the quote you are referring to is in fact not Q, Q’s first “official” post was in response to the anon that said that.