7
JeremiahKassin 7 points ago +7 / -0

A mediocre job. Better than the alternatives, but he's still getting a lot dangerously wrong.

4
JeremiahKassin 4 points ago +4 / -0

Who knew Canadians used to have a stereotype of being uptight?

1
JeremiahKassin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now, you've strayed directly into the realm of opinion. I can back everything I've said with scripture. Yes, there are some denominations that ignore those scriptures. They are no longer Christian, and their adherents are in danger of hellfire. You're an intelligent person, but you're not as smart as you think you are. It's a shame you worship your own intellect, instead of He who created it. Then, you might have the slightest inkling that everything you've said, from the perspective of a person of faith, is the ravings of a lunatic. See, I really do believe the Bible. Therefore, changing my stance to fit what the world is saying would be like abandoning the ground because I don't believe in gravity. It just doesn't work that way.

1
JeremiahKassin 1 point ago +1 / -0
  1. Just because a person has lost themselves to their desires doesn't mean they couldn't have changed. It just means they didn't want it enough. No one is entirely a slave to any desire. Your argument is absurd.

  2. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

You think this is the first go around? You think this is the first time Christianity has faced off with homosexuality and general perversion? You really believe that whole line about the "right side of history?" Dude. Read a history book.

  1. Nope. And you, as a non-Christian really ought not be trying to argue theology. You're bad at it.
1
JeremiahKassin 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's a wonderful series of lies, you've got there.

  1. Testimony from former homosexuals says that's simply not true.

  2. People who define themselves by their sins tend to be more likely to relapse into them.

  3. God ABSOLUTELY changes your nature. It might be slow, but there wouldn't be much point in salvation if it wasn't transformative.

0
JeremiahKassin 0 points ago +4 / -4

That's patently false. All it takes is one case of someone giving up homosexuality to prove it can be done, and there's many thousands.

And you're absurdly finding contradiction in my argument where there is none. Is someone "innately" a theif? Can alcoholism not be cured? Is it impossible to repent of murder?

Go ahead and spout the next line of propaganda if you want. I'm tired of having the same old arguments over and again, always and already knowing the conclusion.

2
JeremiahKassin 2 points ago +9 / -7

There's no such thing as a "gay person." Categorizing perversion doesn't make it stop being perversion. Stop putting bright, fluffy labels on degeneracy and pretending it's innate.

A thief doesn't have to steal. A murderer didn't have to murder. An alcoholic doesn't have to drink.

0
JeremiahKassin 0 points ago +1 / -1

The Constitution was amended, and, once again, if you've done any research into this, you have to know the guy who tried to make that argument in court went to PRISON. You're a bad actor. Anyone who listens to you is going to prison, too.

0
JeremiahKassin 0 points ago +1 / -1

You have to know men have gone to prison making this same argument in court. Since you know that to be the case, the only reason you could possibly have to post this here is to mislead, and get people to incriminate themselves. You're not a patriot. You're the enemy of real patriots.

I'm as anti-tax as anyone, but if we want to fix the system, we have to restore the Constitution, not play pretend like a tranny.

0
JeremiahKassin 0 points ago +1 / -1

What you're doing is called "entrapment." I don't care if you're six degrees removed from the law enforcement agency paying you: you're trying to trick people into committing a crime so the government can come after them.

If it was "voluntary," Al Capone would've died a free man.

2
JeremiahKassin 2 points ago +3 / -1

As to the second one you slipped in there, "in protest, they went to prison."

Not paying taxes doesn't hurt the government in any real way. They'll just print more money. But, you, in the other hand, get a nice, fat target on your back.

And I can't help but notice this idea started gaining traction just as the federal government brought a ludicrous amount of IRS agents into the fold.

The glow is so bright, I can't tell if it's coming off of you, or just reflected in your ideas, but either way, whoever follows your lead is stepping straight into a bear trap.

Don't be stupid.

8
JeremiahKassin 8 points ago +8 / -0

It turns out if you use government money to bribe hospitals to list a common illness on every death certificate, they'll list that common illness on every death certificate.

1
JeremiahKassin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Close, but not quite. Gog and Magog is Britain. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gogmagog_(giant)

Cush is Sudan, Put is Egypt. I'm also not sure about the Young Lion being the US. More likely, it's the kingdom that becomes the final caliphate, where the antichrist will rise out of.

1
JeremiahKassin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Won't happen. Gog and Magog have to hang around to ally with Rosh, Meshach and Tubal for the Ezekiel war. If anything, this is further proof that this is not the end.

0
JeremiahKassin 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm starting to believe you take it up the ass.

6
JeremiahKassin 6 points ago +6 / -0

So he stood up to them, and they found a way to run him out of town.

9
JeremiahKassin 9 points ago +10 / -1

They died because they caught the flu, panicked, and got put on a ventilator, which then blew out their lungs.

1
JeremiahKassin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd interpret that to mean those who were going to be affected in the short term by the vaccine probably felt the effects after the first or second dose. Those who didn't feel the effects were more likely to continue taking it. Obviously, if an injection kills you, you're not going to get a chance to take another dose.

What would be really telling, here, though, is when a person is considered "vaccinated" according to the data. The CDC claimed a person wasn't "vaccinated" until two weeks after their dose, allowing them to classify adverse affects as results of COVID. If the British government did the same, then the third timers are still considerably higher than those who refused.

view more: Next ›