Know this.
I think you might best be well served focusing on yourself.
.
A central paradox of the modern American presidency is that citizens regularly call for strong presidential leadership while at the same time their political culture predisposes them to be reluctant followers.1 One of the ways contemporary presidents resolve this paradox is by invoking an electoral mandate. By persuading others that he possesses a mandate from the voters to pursue a particular policy agenda, a president can disguise his leadership under the pretense of simply carrying out “the will of the people.” The presidential mandate thus enables presidents to lead while seeming to follow, to exercise power over people under the guise of empowering the people.
Ellis, R., & Kirk, S. (1995). Presidential Mandates in the Nineteenth Century: Conceptual Change and Institutional Development. Studies in American Political Development, 9(1), 117-186. doi:10.1017/S0898588X00001188
Daughter: [Sits on Dad’s lap and innocently asks a question] Dad, what did you do during the time Trump started his own media empire and now our family is set for life? Dad: [Answers her question nonchalantly] I bought DWAC and HODL. Son: [Playing with a truck on the floor listening in] Legend.
Thanks in advance.
.
I’m OK with that…
.
.
.
If so, this has been in the works for a long time.
Even for someone that didn’t follow them, their absence is noticeable. GOOD!
.