I'm interested in looking at the statistics, that is if they're even really being reported, to see how they compare in terms of ill-aftereffects.

Globally, I'm only aware of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines being the only mRNA ones. The rest are either considered viral vector or subunit.

My best friend got the Janssen vaccine when they started rolling it out. As far as I know, he hasn't had any ill-aftereffects. That vax is considered a viral vector type. Compare this to my father and grandmother who both received a Moderna shot, and both have been having heart issues.

Are the mRNA vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna) the only ones causing significant instances of ill-aftereffects? Whenever I hear of these instances, it always seems to be related to these two. While the mRNA vaccines essentially program your body to make the spike protein, are the other types more like traditional vaccines?

In recent times it seems countries like Japan are starting to wake up? I've seen articles where people are coming out and talking to councils, boards, etc. regarding the vaccines. Japan has somewhere around an 80% vaccination rate, and the brands approved there were Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Novavax, with the latter two being viral vector and subunit.

I'm also curious on what we can consider "tainted" blood. Those who have received doses of Pfizer and Moderna for sure can be considered to be tainted. But should we consider those who received non-mRNA doses tainted as well? This would depend on how common the ill-aftereffects are, I think. My greatest concern is what happens if you need a blood transfusion, or how the child of someone who is vaccinated for Covid and someone who is not turns out (a study of this would be interesting to read).

I’m assuming an appeal was immediately made or will soon be if not yet done so. Would he still be sentenced before anything is done with an appeal? Is there any way it gets tied up in courts beyond Election Day? I’m just wondering how likely it is he has to serve any time whatsoever prior to the election. As of now it’s set for July 11, but might this get pushed back?

I am almost 100% certain that they will throw the book at him and give him as much jail time as they can. I’ve heard some people say they’ll just hit him with a very hefty fine, but they want him in prison. If that’s an option, they’ll do it.

I have no faith in any jurors chosen for Trump’s trial. Almost certainly most or all will be biased against him. I’d say that his verdict is already written.

So unless a miracle occurs and they rule not guilty, what then? I’m sure he will appeal any conviction, but he faces up to 4 years in prison. I can pretty much guarantee the judge will throw the book at him given the chance.