PROTOCOL No. 3:
POVERTY OUR WEAPON
- All people are chained down to heavy toil by poverty more firmly than ever. They were chained by slavery and serfdom; from these, one way and another, they might free themselves. These could be settled with, but from want they will never get away. We have included in the constitution such rights as to the masses appear fictitious and not actual rights. All these so-called "Peoples Rights" can exist only in idea, an idea which can never be realized in practical life. What is it to the proletariat laborer, bowed double over his heavy toil, crushed by his lot in life, if talkers get the right to babble, if journalists get the right to scribble any nonsense side by side with good stuff, once the proletariat has no other profit out of the constitution save only those pitiful crumbs which we fling them from our table in return for their voting in favor of what we dictate, in favor of the men we place in power, the servants of our AGENTUR ... Republican rights for a poor man are no more than a bitter piece of irony, for the necessity he is under of toiling almost all day gives him no present use of them, but the other hand robs him of all guarantee of regular and certain earnings by making him dependent on strikes by his comrades or lockouts by his masters.
- Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
You are making an argument based on text from a book. Which is an observation.
Their chief religious book.
Until I see Jewish people in large numbers out in the streets just blasting people. Then they say "My religon premits me to kill non Jews".
There is this place called Gaza, you can find it on a map. You might occassionally hear about it in the news as well.
I don't let Text or Video Clips or Stats to tell me what REALITY is.
How do you respond to a statement like this?
Ok, you win! Seriously though, you are just too damn sensitive.
- Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off
If you knew anything about Christ, you would not be so anti-Israel.
- Use a straw man
So long, "Dr."
Oh look, another straw man
- Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
How many Jews are speaking out against ZIONIST right now???
The ever-present not all Jews argument.
4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
No, they are instructed to lie. Keep going, this conversation is working out great for you
Sanhedrin 59a
To communicate anything to a Goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the Goyim knew what we teach about them, they would kill us openly.
"Hey... do you think it's a good idea not to steal?"
The Talmud teaches that Jews are permitted to steal and deceive Gentiles, if the Gentile does not reside in “Eretz Yisrael” (land of Israel), and if they do not observe the seven Noahide laws, (Bava Kamma 113b:1-2). Therefore, the Talmud teaches it’s acceptable for Jews to steal from non-Jews.
"Hey... do you think it's a good idea not to kill someone?"
Sanhedrin 58b [In other words, if a non-Jew kills a Jew, the non-Jew can be killed. Punching an Israelite is akin to assaulting God. (But killing a non-Jew is NOT like assaulting God.]
If a goy killed a goy or a Jew he is responsible, but if a Jew killed a goy he is not responsible.
Jewish Common Sense
You asked how it was a straw man, I answered clearly in 2 languages for you. This failed so you are now moving to rules 15, 20 & 22.
15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions.
20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentation
22. Manufacture a new truth.
With another straw man thrown in for good measure.
Your anti-semitism is a little too loud. You are obviously not a Christian, and suspect you are a Muslim.
Christ is King.
Oh look, another Straw man. I said political guests, not all guests.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZFApIBGQAg
Here's a google docs spread listing all of his guests, show that 42% of guests under the "Political" category are Jewish. Jews make up 2.5% of the US population.
You're out of your league.
I would assume that a "PHD in NY" would know what a Straw man argument is. But since you seem confused I will share the definition and then explain how you are using it.
What’s the straw man fallacy?
"A straw man is a form of argument and an informal fallacy of having the impression of refuting an argument, while the proper idea of argument under discussion was not addressed or properly refuted."
In this scenario the topic under discussion is not whether there are "Good Israelis" it is Members of the Zionist Cabal, whom have their headquarters in Israel, are using "America First" news outlets to further their agenda. in this case, the obvious Charlie Kirk.
Your initial statement was to try to disregard all the information on this comment by pointing out I miscounted the amount of letters in Modernity News. Congrats, I unlike Zionists can admit when I make a mistake.
When I called you on your initial attempt to disregard everything in this post with said straw man argument, you moved to straw man argument #2 - The ever present "Not all Jews" used by professional JIDF members on internet forums. This argument again, has absolutely nothing to do with the topic of this post.
I will now use google translate to a familiar language for you.
איך וואלט געמיינט אז א "פ.ה.ד אין נ.י." וועט וויסן וואס איז א שטרוימאן טענה. אָבער זינט איר ויסקומען צעמישט, איך וועל טיילן די דעפֿיניציע און דערנאָך דערקלערן ווי איר נוצן עס.
** וואָס איז דער שטרוי מענטש פאַלאַסי?**
** "א שטרוי מענטש איז אַ פאָרעם פון אַרגומענט און אַ ינפאָרמאַל פאַלאַסי פון האָבן דעם רושם פון ריפיוטינג אַן אַרגומענט, בשעת די געהעריק געדאַנק פון אַרגומענט אונטער דיסקוסיע איז נישט גערעדט אָדער רעכט ריפיוטיד."
אין דעם סצענאַר די טעמע אונטער דיסקוסיע איז נישט צי עס זענען "גוטע ישראלים" עס זענען מיטגלידער פון די ציוניסט קאַבאַל, וואָס האָבן זייער הויפּטקוואַרטיר אין ישראל, נוצן "אַמעריקע ערשטער" נייַעס אַוטלעץ צו פאָרזעצן זייער אַגענדאַ. אין דעם פאַל, די קלאָר ווי דער טאָג טשאַרלי קירק.
דיין ערשט ויסזאָגונג איז געווען צו פּרובירן צו דיסריגאַרד אַלע די אינפֿאָרמאַציע אויף דעם באַמערקונג דורך ווייזן אַז איך מיסקאָונטעד די נומער פון אותיות אין Modernity News. מאַזל - טאָוו, איך אַנדערש ווי ציוניסט קענען אַרייַנלאָזן ווען איך מאַכן אַ טעות.
ווען איך האב דיר אנגערופן אויף דיין ערשטן פּרווון צו איגנאָרירן אַלץ אין דעם פּאָסטן מיט דעם שטרוי מענטש אַרגומענט, איר אריבערגעפארן צו שטרוי מענטש אַרגומענט #2 - די שטענדיק פאָרשטעלן "ניט אַלע אידן" געניצט דורך פאַכמאַן JIDF מיטגלידער אויף אינטערנעט גרופּעס. דעם אַרגומענט ווידער, כאָוס לעגאַמרע גאָרנישט צו טאָן מיט די טעמע פון
Posting Rev 2:9 or 3:9 will at first get your account flagged, afterwards you get deleted. And it was after Oct.7th. Maybe around December.
I can find the screenshots today.