- Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
No, Quantum entangled comms would allow for communications instantly at any distance and across what we perceive as time.
Entangled Quantum Particles Can "Communicate" Through Time https://www.discovery.com/science/Entangled-Quantum-Particles-Communicate
Binary is 1's and 0's. With enough Quantum entangled particles, to my limited understanding, this type of communication would be possible.
Scroll this and you'll understand why I expect to be attacked over my digs.
- Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
Not sure, I never "attack" anyone unless they attack me first. Everything I present I bring receipts and evidence to verify what I am saying. I know certain users are (them) and I could go harder, as is my MO on /pol/, but here we follow a different decorum.
I have a shit-ton of knowledge around Q because I was there from before Day 1. I am more valuable to the movement posting information than I am arguing with them with them or doing things to get myself banned. 8kun/8chan/4chan are octagon, here it is more like sparring.
Sorry, it was Lex Friedman that has 70% Jewish guests, Joe is 50%
Jordan Peterson - 25% Jewish
Sam Harris 38% Jewish guests
Tim Pool - 22% Jewish
Russel Brand 21%
Jews represent 2.5% of the population. Quite the over-representation wouldn't you say?
- Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
Yes. Did you know that 70% of Joe Rogan political guests are Jewish?
It's not him, it's me. The people behind the down votes are the same people that have posted about me a literal 14,800 times in three years on QResearch. I was a BV there. I started out as someone that supported Israel 100%. It was through researching Q drops and moderating that board that I slowly started to understand who Q was talking about. When I started to be vocal about it they started spamming about me.
I haven't posted on Q Research since 2021, and yet they still spam about me on a daily basis. Ask yourself who would have this amount of time to attack someone that only researched and posted graphics of their findings.
See for youself, JIDF posted about me 13 times just yesterday. It's pretty comical.
https://expose-news.com/2023/11/01/is-jordan-petersons-arc-wef-2-0/