this show is for the cabal. they know better than any of us what the data revealed so far implicates and they must be aware of what's to come from Jovan and further forensics. absolute panic time!

logic suggests that having prevented audit leaks until the day before (clearly intentional to get free advertising from lamestream) and Qs suicide weekend comm was to avoid the guilty swamp rats from being suicided over a stretch of time that might seem less suspicious than what we could be in store for this weekend or some shorter period of time. assuming cabal is reading Q, and we know they are (I believe Q comms are for the enemy to sweat), they must fear that lots of eyes are on them making it near impossible to suicide any of their lackeys that will now instead become white hats star witnesses with the heat being turned up so high

calling all law fags! what weight does 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256 carry and who is this Jon Rolland that appears to get to comment?

https://constitution.org/1-Law/uslaw/16amjur2nd.htm

text of this link:

The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be In agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:

The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.

Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.....

A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the lend, it is superseded thereby.

No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.

Jon Roland:

Strictly speaking, an unconstitutional statute is not a "law", and should not be called a "law", even if it is sustained by a court, for a finding that a statute or other official act is constitutional does not make it so, or confer any authority to anyone to enforce it.

All citizens and legal residents of the United States, by their presence on the territory of the United States, are subject to the militia duty, the duty of the social compact that creates the society, which requires that each, alone and in concert with others, not only obey the Constitution and constitutional official acts, but help enforce them, if necessary, at the risk of one's life.

Any unconstitutional act of an official will at least be a violation of the oath of that official to execute the duties of his office, and therefore grounds for his removal from office. No official immunity or privileges of rank or position survive the commission of unlawful acts. If it violates the rights of individuals, it is also likely to be a crime, and the militia duty obligates anyone aware of such a violation to investigate it, gather evidence for a prosecution, make an arrest, and if necessary, seek an indictment from a grand jury, and if one is obtained, prosecute the offender in a court of law.

We've all been struggling with what "the plan" is and how the egits that haven't awakened yet could possibly be awakened.

my thought:

the AZ audit is getting hot we all know and it wouldn't be surprising to any patriot here if after the subpoenas and release of data that some AZ swamp creatures get charged with treason and worse. this outcome is starting to seem more and more real to me anyway.

so now let's say that AZ data comes out and around the same time our Pillow guy has his symposium showing data that matches what turned up following the extensive AZ audit. in other words, Lindell's data is confirmed by the AZ audit and Lindell's data details what happened in Georgia, Wisconsin, PA, CA, etc.

The swamp creatures in those states/counties are likely to start shittin themselves seeing what is happening to the riggers in AZ and seeing that WE HAVE IT ALL. many one would think would feel very cornered...some commit suicide perhaps, some are so psychopathic they think they can beat it and some beg for mercy and give it all up.

when those folks who for months have been screaming audits are "dangerous to our democracy" and that there was no fraud start to tell their sycophants that they were lying the entire time and they are so sorry for their part in the big lie and the election steal these cucks will have to snap out of it. and those that don't will be lost forever

once these cucks get on our side the faux government will crumble and we'll have the republic we deserve!

WWG1WGA

I have little ones so often find myself watching their shows with them. watching this Planes movie where the planes are racing and they're numbered, so naturally I was curious who was #17. Yellow Bird is the character's name. not sure if this means anything within the community, but I found his Fandom bio to be interesting

https://worldofcarsdrivein.fandom.com/wiki/Yellow_Bird

plucked from Fandom "History"

Yellow Bird is a racing plane which is shown sporting #1 and #17.

In Planes, he sets the fastest time in the qualifier round for the Wings Around the Globe (mirror GAW. maybe a stretch) and competes in the rally.

He is then seen in many shots of the racers throughout the movie, including in the pit row at John F. Kennedy International Airport. (JFK mention, really)

He strangely does not appear with the other racers to give Dusty parts, although he is seen saying that Dusty is back (like our republic is) he was rebuilt.

could the white hats/Q have had their hands in these details back in 2013 when the movie came out?

what if Q planned this? anyone paying attention to evidence presented in court and if what we expect to be presented by the defense is produced, the chance that Chauvin gets convicted of anything serious is nil to none.

the big Q we should have is, when he`s fount NOT GUILTY, how much uproar will their actually be? antifa and BLM lost their steam big time once Biden "won" the election and the enthusiasm level has been absolutely dismal. not to mention the reports of ActBlue and the dems apparently screwing over antifa and BLM financially that seemed to piss off these marxist, or money whores at best.

so what if Chauvin is found not guilty and it's near crickets from protesters?

I say that means go time! If they display such lack of enthusiasm and fight it's clear they don't really want the administration that's been foisted upon them and they are ready for the military and ultimately the return of GEOTUS