Like many of us here, I have been following the open letters written by Archbishop Vigano. I mentioned him recently in an email to someone who says she is a conservative...however, I got the following reply from her, and frankly I'm baffled by what she had to say. What do you all think?
"Vigano is a disgrace to not only the church but also humanity. He lied to the courts. He lied to the pope. He is a thief and an abuser. I'm just glad the courts nailed his little ass."
WTF is she talking about?
So Old Joe has come up with half a billion tests to be sent out to Americans. Now I don't know if they're just going to send them, or if you have to request them, but either way I would like to propose a sort of poll. It's self-reporting, so no way it can be scientific, but just for grins and giggles, how about if we get these tests in the mail, we start testing weird things around the house and report back on GAW the results?
You could test pee, poo, apple juice, tap water, vegetables, dogs, cats, goats, whatever you can think of. Then post the results here.... date of test, item tested, and results.
Used to be any post that had a Tweet would (upon clicking the subject line) open a preview of the Tweet. Now I have to click the subject, then click the subject AGAIN when the post opens up, which takes me to the dreaded Twatter website, then say "NO I don't want to be part of Twatter" before I can read the subject Tweet.
Is there a fix for this? Is it Twatter that is the problem? Is it GAW? Please advise.
Without inundating me with conspiracy theories, what is the actual engineering and scientific story about 5G? My wife and I are looking at new phones and they are 5G. Techno nerds of GAW, what is the story?
In the interest of fairness and balance, I delved into the recent claims about the Salvation Army and their purported statements about white privilege and race. Here is their full response:
The Salvation Army's Response to False Claims on the Topic of Racism
Nov 25, 2021
As the country celebrates Thanksgiving today, it is a welcome reminder of the things we are grateful for—and for the power of service on behalf of those who are less fortunate.
The Salvation Army mission statement clearly outlines our service: to preach the gospel of Jesus Christ and to meet human needs in His name without discrimination. That service, and our beliefs, are based solely on the Bible and that has not, and will not, change.
Though we remain committed to serving everyone in need—regardless of their beliefs, their backgrounds, or their lifestyle—recently some individuals and groups have attempted to mislabel our organization to serve their own agenda(s). They have made outrageous claims that we believe our donors should apologize for their own racism, that The Salvation Army believes America is an inherently racist society, and that our organization has abandoned its beliefs for one ideology or another. In fact, an online petition is asking supporters to “stand against the insertion of politically charged racial ideologies into The Salvation Army’s good work.”
Those claims are false, and they distort the very goal of our work.
The truth is that The Salvation Army believes that racism is fundamentally incompatible with Christianity, and we are called to work toward a world where all people are loved, accepted, and valued. Our positional statement on racism makes this clear. These beliefs are important because we know that racism exists, and we are therefore determined to do everything the Bible asks us to do to overcome it.
The Salvation Army has occasionally published study guides on various complex topics, including race, to help foster positive conversations and reflection among Salvationists. The hope is that by openly discussing these issues, we can encourage a more thoughtful organization that is better positioned to serve those in need. These guides are solely designed for internal use. No one is being told how to think. Period.
The very purpose of conversation is to share differing points of view and to hear from people with different experiences. Discussion is not indoctrination. It’s what reasonable people do. It’s how we learn and we grow. Thankfully, not everyone thinks the same way – it’s what makes us unique in the eyes of our Creator. Yet some have taken the fact that we have invited such conversations about race among our members as an opportunity to push their own agenda. In doing so, they have sought to shut down conversation, not foster it.
We at The Salvation Army remain undeterred in our mission because we are confident in the power of the gospel, and because millions of vulnerable Americans need our help. We remain deeply grateful for the support of a generous public—people from all walks of life and from all parts of the country—who help us meet human need wherever it exists. Ours is a message of love, even for those who disagree or attack us. That is the model set by Christ that we strive to follow every day. God bless you, and happy Thanksgiving.
EDIT & UPDATE: Digging further, I found that the SA also has this statement on race at their website, in PDF form:
In the original post's link, there's another link that leads to a PDF (https://s3.amazonaws.com/cache.salvationarmy.org/e0c074e3-39db-4b09-a6ea-aa5bdb6ecaa6_Let%2527s%2520Talk%2520About...%2520Racism%2520COMPLETE%2520SET.pdf) from the Salvation Army titled "Let's Talk About Racism" and on page 3 there's this:
• Move from the flawed human idea of race and culture into God’s design and purpose for us to live as a unified, diverse and equitable people.
• Lament, repent and apologize for biases or racist ideologies held and actions committed.
I have a relative who, because she works in the medical industry, will be required to take a vaxx and boosters. She REALLY doesn't want to but her well paying job is at stake. Are there currently any reliable methods to detox the body after getting jabbed with God knows what is in the vaxxes? I hear that graphene is the worst ingredient.
Anybody know about detox methods?
How long before riots break out around America? 3... 2....
How long before riots break out around America? 3... 2....
What is the process for picking a replacement vice president? Anybody know?
I did not create this post, I am merely sharing it from a writer going by the name of "JohnCocktostn".... Jury nullification is something you will never hear a judge talk about when addressing a jury, as most judges thinks it gives too much power to a jury. But jury members don't realize just how much power they have. If any of you are ever called for jury duty, know these simple facts first:
Calling all pedes: A brief on types of juries, nullification, and how YOU can effectuate justice.
posted moments ago by JohnCocktoastin
Hi, Frens!
The purpose of this short PSA is to explain jury duty to everyone, what the different types of juries are, and how your service when called is ESSENTIAL to the fight against cucked prosecutors and tyrannical government. If you receive a jury summons, it is of the utmost importance that you comply and attend. Somewhere out there, there might be a fren in need who's ass is in a sling and needs one of us to save them from a Binger, a Weissman, a Mueller, or (insert any cucked prosecutor name here).
In the USA, there are 2 types of juries. Grand juries and petit juries. Grand juries are used at both the federal and state level. The Constitution of the United States requires that federal charges be brought by grand jury indictment. Federal Grand juries are typically composed of 23 members, of which 16 must be present to constitute a quorum. Grand juries do not judge the guilt or innocence of the defendant. They are tasked with making a finding that probable cause exists the defendant committed a crime. A US attorney will present evidence to the grand jury, and 16 of the 23 must vote to indict the defendant for the charge to be filed. When this happens, it is called "returning a true bill." A failure to get 16 of 23 votes is "failing to return a true bill."
The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure provide for slightly smaller grand juries, with a minimum of 12 to return a true bill. In practice, this is rarely, if ever, seen. Grand jurors may be asked by the prosecutor to view evidence, listen to witness testimony, and are permitted to ask questions of witnesses. Prosecutors often utilize the power of grand juries as investigative tools to elicit further evidence of a possible crime. Witness testimony can be compelled in a grand jury proceeding. And defendants can legally be compelled to testify before a grand jury, in spite of their 5th amendment privilege against self incrimination. Said defendant will be required to show up and assert this right to the grand jury. They cannot be compelled to testify against themselves, but they can be compelled to assert this right to the grand jury and the grand jury is under no obligation to hold this as a legitimate exercise of constitutional privilege. However, current DOJ policy is not to make defendants do this to avoid lengthy pretrial litigation over the sufficiency of indictments.
Prosecutors DO NOT have to adduce evidence to the grand jury that might exonerate the defendant. This is not an adversarial proceeding. It is very one sided. Which is why the saying "a grand jury will indict a ham sandwich if the prosecutor wants them to" comes from. This is one of the reasons it is extremely important to be vigilant and participate in these proceedings.
As a citizen on a grand jury, you must keep your sniffer up. These guys must indict via this process in order to railroad someone. So it is your job to detect this and refuse to do it when it is before you. Certainly you will sit on some cases where a defendant needs to be charged. But don't get roped into the prosecutor's bullshit too hard. Be smart and ask the right questions. Don't let a fren get caught up in a railroading because you either didn't serve on the grand jury or you didn't speak up. And you are free to share your feelings with other grand jurors. Let everyone know what you think and why its bogus if you think so. It is your civic duty to be the check on cucked prosecutors. This is one of the many ways.
State grand juries function similarly to federal grand juries with minor nuances. Not every state requires indictment by grand jury, and some states will require it for certain charges and not others. While others will allow a complaint to be filed by a prosecutor or a true bill by grand jury. Your state will outline this in their state rules of criminal procedure which you can look up.
Petit juries are what we all are familiar with. They exist on state and federal levels. In criminal trials, this is where they must get unanimous 12 person verdicts to convict. As annoying af as it can be to get called, we must serve on these. Jurors are going to have the final say on Kyle, and cucked jurors give cucked verdicts for cucked prosecutors. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO CONVICT ANYONE that you do not feel is guilty. Or that you feel was brought up on bogus charges. Your jury vote cannot be second guessed by anyone. And you are free to persuade fellow jurors to your line of thinking. Some call this "nullification" and it drives some lawyers/judges/politicians mad. But this is your civic right in the USA. Just say "NO!" to cucked charges and corrupt prosecutions. Simply refuse to do it.
This is my PSA. I am happy to answer any legitimate questions you all might have. But I cannot emphasize enough how important it is that we fulfill this duty in this current crisis. We must fill the seats to check the corrupt powers that be and save a fren in need.
Opinion:
While we watch and wait for a jury decision in the Rittenhouse case, what is really on trial there is the Justice System itself. Many of us anons on GAW have, over the years, lost our trust and faith in our Justice System. The DOJ/FBI cabal seem to be water boys for the Deep State and Demwit Party, and "law enforcement" across the nation is a spotty patchwork excellent local systems right next to some corrupt and ineffectual systems.
So what will come out of this trial will be a litmus test of Justice in America.
I've been in an email debate with someone I know out in California. For the most part she's of conservative bent, but is in very poor overall health and keeps defending, even PROMOTING, people taking the experimental "vaccines." I've told her repeatedly my reasons for not being vaccinated, but she has a deaf ear toward my reasons.
One of her illnesses is periodic MS-like conditions that flare up occasionally. I told her that there is a connection between the vaxx'es and MS, Bell's Palsy, and other autoimmune conditions. I was able to provide a few links, but would like to be able to send her RELIABLE articles and medical journal articles on this subject.
Anyone have reputable (not conspiracy theory sites) articles on the current jabs and MS and/or Bell's Palsy flare ups?
I have been trying to search (without success) the Q drops to see if there is any discussion about COVID or vaccines. Has anyone found anything like that?
Download Bongino's podcast dated today, there is a 20 minute interview with President 45.
Yeah, I know Simon Parkes doesn't carry a lot of weight around here, but this morning I got an intriguing entry that a friend of mine sent to me that originated on that site. Here is the posting in its entirety, any comments welcomed:
Queen death (Key marker)
Storm Tweet next 24hrs
Watch those new profiles perhaps
Think Bomb Cyclone (Done)
Think all of those Ships being held up from US Ports (EO13848) (Done)
Shutdown of Earth Sunday
10 Days Of Darkness
Military EBS
DECLAS Monday NIH
JFK Tuesday
1st Q Drop 28th - Russia 10 Day (Active) Shutdown
Hillary Arrest 30th
Halloween - JFK Jr Plane Landing? Registration Expires
Declas to bring Indictments/Arrests before UN meeting.
10 day Ends Nov 2
Military to explain the 3 day Event
[34] Bombings of Satanic Buildings
Nov 3, Nov 4,
Remember, Remember the Fifth Of November. Calendar will flip back to Julian Calendar.
We Will live this twice...
On this day in history, Oct. 31, 1776, King George III addresses Parliament for the first time since American independence was declared:
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/king-speaks-for-first-time-since-independence-declared
The lesson drawn from this item is that from declaration to victory, a long 4-years war raged across the colonies, with losses and victories, until we finally gained our independence. It wasn't the Declaration of Independence that secured our freedom, it was our willingness to fight in harsh conditions for a victory that no one could have guaranteed then.
America was born in blood and fire. What will it take, and what will we be willing to expend, for a rebirth of America?
I'm getting a "best of" show on my local radio station. Anyone know what's up with Bongino today?
Greetings to all our Aussie friends down under. I just had a thought about your lockdowns and government overreach there. Could the AUS government be under the hidden control of the Chinese? Remember that countries, especially Asian countries, often try to expand their territory, especially those countries nearest them and that are rich in natural resources.
The Japanese in the run-up to WWII were in an expansionist period when they invaded China and other Pacific nations... the Philippines etc. Perhaps China, seeing its own economic fragility right now, intends to expand its weak empire to strengthen it with the land and resources of those nearest them. And that would include Australia.
It appears that, if this idea is correct, China and their paid lapdogs in other countries have begun a quiet invasion without having fired a shot.
Would be glad to hear your all's thoughts on this.
I know datefagging is discouraged here and I accept that. BUT... are there any approaching dates we should be mindful of? Cout cases? Anything?
I hope the video below will play for y'all. So this was sent to me this morning, by a person asking if I thought it was real. It was on a twatter feed by Jerome Bell, but that account has been suspended. The video purports to be some Chinese guy talking about how the vaccines will kill us off, especially the military; however there is no citation saying who he is or even if the translation is correct. Had this been debunked somewhere and I don't know about it?