4
abraxas628 4 points ago +4 / -0

Doxing means revealing their private address and/or phone number. This is just exposing them as frauds. By the way I had forgotten Michael Jaco. Done.

2
abraxas628 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because I saw her often on the Charlie Ward, and so, either she is stupid or she is complicit, and I don't think she is stupid. Mel Q is great, not Mel K.

1
abraxas628 1 point ago +1 / -0

Considering the fact tath the german army was superior in 1939, because our coward politicians refuse to invade Germany and dismantled his army in 1930, France would have lost anyway but with millions deaths, so I admit it was humiliating for France to capitulate but it allowed half of the country to remain unoccupied by the german army, and organize the resistance. It was the least bad solution since the mistake was already made 10 years before. I love the american culture and am very knowledgeable about it. This is not arrogance. I was just pointing the fact that your vision of war is essentially based on the second world war, and not the first, which, as I said, was just a horror show. When a big portion of your population is either dead or totally disfigured, you tend to rethink your thirst for war.

8
abraxas628 8 points ago +9 / -1

French here. This kind of remark piss me off. We won the first world war against Germany without your help, but we had to sacrifice 1,7 millions people out of 40 millions inhabitants, and many more millions disfigured or scared for life. For reference you lost only 50 000 people during the second world war. That's why the frenchs were so afraid to start another war after this trauma, because the price of victory was so high. You americans still have this romantic and heroic vision about war, which is very naive. Look up the faces of the victims of the first war and you'll see it was just a horror show. You had one war as well with England during your history, we had 30. And I'm not counting the wars with the germans, the italians, the spanishs, and the muslims. Learn a bit about history before judging other countries.

2
abraxas628 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're right. People criticizing Trump about that don't understand that he knows much more about the big picture than we do. Your point just makes sense.

6
abraxas628 6 points ago +7 / -1

It makes sense because it allows people on the left to oppose the vaccine, like Naomi Wolfe, otherwise, it would be pro-vaccine democrats vs anti-vaccine republicans, which is roughly true, but for optics sake, you cannot allow the medias to push this polarization, it would be counter-productive. Like I said before, any republican with half a brain did not take the vaccine despite Trump promoting it. By the way, he said that the vaccine "saved the world" not "saved people" and he is right. It was the countermeasure to the project to prolong the lockdowns during 3-5 years (watch the movie Songbird, pure predictive programming).

14
abraxas628 14 points ago +17 / -3

He has to, otherwise the medias would become much more agressives against the unvaccinateds and the politisation of the "vaccine" would get even worse. But any republican (or anyone) with half a brain won't take it, and if you do, don't complain afterwards. You have more than enough informations to know that this shit is poison. If you are too lazy to do the minimum amount of research, maybe you should take it, it will be a favor to humanity.

7
abraxas628 7 points ago +7 / -0

A figure of 160,000 people in France is currently circulating on the government propaganda media. In reality, it is well over 2 million people with more than 200 gatherings (even in villages) all over the country. This is the France I love.

32
abraxas628 32 points ago +32 / -0

French here. I was there. I confirm there were more than 150 000 just in Paris. And there were manifestations everywhere in France. It was wild and beautiful.

3
abraxas628 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you my friend. Indeed, WWG1WGA.

5
abraxas628 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes, in terms of lying mainstream medias, we are keeping up with the USA.

6
abraxas628 6 points ago +6 / -0

Actually I did not know what to think about Q for one month and Alex Jones is the one who set the deal for me. If he is against Q, this is a solid proof that Q is legit.

2
abraxas628 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're welcome. This guy is amazing. The right combination of faith and lucidity. Check the previous ones if you can. You won't be disappointed.

2
abraxas628 2 points ago +2 / -0

What you americans don't understand is that the frenchs are not afraid of the government, they are afraid of their own violence. 1789 was just one episode in our 2000 years history. Every time the french people explode, it ends up in a bloodbath. We all know that, that's why we try to stay non-violent because we know our history. Macron wants us to get violent to win the optics war and justify even more police control. I was in a manifestation in Nantes yesterday and there was no violence, so we did not give any angle to the whore medias to demonize us.

1
abraxas628 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course ! Macron would already be out without the police, that's why the police and the army have been exempted from the mandatory jab. They have nothing left beside violence, because consent is not definitively here.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›