Who has heard of the US Justice Dept JFK letter to Warren Commission, now known as the Stroud Document, shows Justice Department in June 1964 sent independent witness verification to top Warren Commission lawyer Mr Rankin that Oswald could not have got from the 6th Floor of the Texas School Book Depository to the 2nd Floor along with other supporting signed testimony.
The key original testimony stenographs of all witnesses on just the day of 7th April 1964 was officially destroyed
A friend sent me this info and the links
Justice Dept JFK letter to Warren Commission the Stroud Document in link below
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/92/cf/ee/92cfee8884d868877be5d115362cf28d.jpg
The original tapes of 7th April 1964 Warren Commission Testimony of Adams, Lovelady and Shelley were recorded as officially destroy by the Warren Commission.
This appears to be the only destroyed WC testimony as can be seen in the National Archive documents in the link below see 2 National Archive documents
https://thegirlonthestairs.wordpress.com/2017/04/24/the-missing-link/
The Key point is that the Justice Dept Stroud Letter of June 1964 independently verifies information, from an independent Justice Dept related party, that Mrs Garner the supervisor of Adams and Styles confirmed they went down the stairs immediately after the JFK shooting and that Mrs Garner remained by the 4th Floor Stairs until officer Baker and Mr Truly came up these stairs having already talked to Oswald on the 2nd Floor.
It was therefore clear that Mrs Garner had proved, without her knowing it, that Oswald could not have used these stairs as an escape route, after a 6th Floor shooting, as was and is now believed.
It can be seen from the Stroud Letter that the to top Warren Commission lawyer Mr Rankin was notified of
-
this verification of the timing of events along with Adams signed WC statement.
-
that all this had been officially investigated on the same day this Justice Department letter was sent, 2nd June 1964, to Mr Rankin
No one has disputed these documents including the destruction of the original stenograph testimony real.
Why was this not investigated ?
The links to some of the research about this in the little known book "The Girl on the Stairs", FBI and Warren Commission and later key Statements are below along with some National Archive Documents
What is set out shows that there were 4 women in one of the 4th Floor offices of the Texas School Book Depository were watching JFK drive by in 1963.
They were Miss Adams, Miss Styles, Mrs Garner the office superivsor and Mrs Dorman. About 6 other women were in other 4th Floor Offices
Miss Adams, Miss Styles and Mrs Garner confirmed in the Warren Commission or FBI and later statements and via the supporting Justice Department Stroud Letter that Lee Harvey Oswald did not come down the stairs from the 6th Floor to the 2nd Floor of the Texas School Book Depository following the JFK shooting as is believed, as they were on those stairs at the time he was supposed to use them. The statement links are set out at the end
Mrs Dorman filmed the JFK event from the 4th Floor window and remained in the office. Garner, Dorman and others in other the 4th Floor offices stated to the FBI they believed the shots came from another building.
Stills from the Dorman movie film were later used by Life Magazine
Miss Adams, Miss Styles and Mrs Garner have all given later testimony about what happened the day JFK was shot which is the same or more extensive than they originally gave and in line with the timings of their FBI statements from 1963 through 1964 and the Stroud Letter
Lovelady's Commission testimony in the link below is important as it shows he seems to know he will be asked about Adams but he says he cannot swear it was Adams he saw. Shelley's statement is equally vague.
Both statements were used to try to undermine Adams testimony of timings and make possible Oswald's escape using the stairs to get from the 6th Floor shooting to the 2nd Floor without being seen.
Adams says that references to Lovelady and Shelley were added to her testimony and it is officially recorded that all the original Warren Commission stenograph tapes of Adams, Shelley and Lovelady taken on 7th April 1964 were officially destroyed unlike those of other witnesses on other days.
The Stoud Letter seems to independently prove it is almost certain that Adam's Warren Commission statements were altered to effect the timings.
Mr. BALL - What is her full name? Mr. LOVELADY - I wouldn't know. Mr. BALL - Vickie Adams? Mr. LOVELADY - I believe so. Mr. BALL - Would you say it was Vickie you saw? Mr. LOVELADY - I couldn't swear. Mr. BALL - Where was the girl? Mr. LOVELADY - I don't remember what place she was but I remember seeing a girl as she was talking to Bill or saw Bill or something, then I went over and asked one of the guys what time it was and to see if we should continue working or what.
Adams and Styles independently in later statements make clear they only saw the same man as officer Baker also later says he saw before he and Mr Truly found Oswald on the 2nd Floor room
“one man all three individuals—Miss Adams, Miss Styles, and Officer Baker—independently told me they noticed near those elevators: a large black man. That is the only person Vicki said she saw and spoke to, not Shelley or Lovelady. That is the only person Miss Styles observed. And that is the same man Baker told me he was about to confront, a la Oswald seconds later, until Truly told him the black man was an employee.”
For more information see the links to Ernest Barry's research and various FBI statements below
Webarchive Sandra Styles FBI Statement page 1
https:/web.archive.org/web/20220714233833/http:/www.prayer-man.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/FBI-62-109060-JFK-HQ-File-Section-EBF-Serial-2720-1.png
Webarchive Sandra Styles FBI Statement page 2
https:/web.archive.org/web/20220714233833/http:/www.prayer-man.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/FBI-62-109060-JFK-HQ-File-Section-EBF-Serial-2720-2.png
Miss Adams FBI Statements are pages at bottom of link below
FBI Statements from TSBD including Mrs Garner of the Stroud Letter fame 20th March 1964
http://www.dufourlaw.com/JFK/first_shot_location_witnesses.PDF
Inteview with Ernest Barry Part B: Barry Ernest; beginning at 40:02 covers the Stroud Letter
https://podcast.blackopradio.com/1032-larry-schnapf-barry-ernest/
Pharma and Chemical Sponsored News Media appears to fail to report serious CDC findings that shows Glyphosate found in 87% of childrens' urine and in 80% of adults and childrens' combined data.
No mainstream media search results show this CDC info under Google News searches [CNN FOX etc]
Only EpochTimes reports CDC findings and Google seach of EpochTimes headline under News fails to find this EpochTimes News story
The Environmental Working Group (EWG) noted in a statement on Monday that 87 percent of 650 children tested had detectable levels of glyphosate, according to the CDC’s analysis.
“Glyphosate is the most widely used herbicide in the country, yet until now we had very little data on exposure,” said Alexis Temkin, EWG toxicologist. “Children in the U.S. are regularly exposed to this cancer-causing weedkiller through the food they eat virtually every day.”
Temkin added that the Environmental Protection Agency should “take concrete regulatory action to dramatically lower the levels of glyphosate in the food supply and protect children’s health.”
In 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer—an arm of the World Health Organization—classified glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans” after a 17-member panel of scientists reviewed almost 1,000 peer-reviewed, published studies on the potential carcinogenicity of the chemical, along with others.
More recently in April 2019, the U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry released an analysis (pdf) regarding studies that connected glyphosate to non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a type of cancer that develops in the lymphatic system, and recommended monitoring children’s exposure to glyphosate.
Other experts have warned that the chemical’s use in the United States and around the world in agriculture has prompted an increase in autism, diabetes, cancer, allergies, and other chronic conditions.
Roundup weed killer contains Glyphosate a Cancer-Linked Herbicide Chemical which is Found in Over 80 Percent of US Urine Samples:
CDC Study By Katabella Roberts July 12, 2022
Researchers at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have found a widely-used herbicide chemical that has been linked to cancer in the majority of urine samples collected from children and adults in the United States.
The health agency released the results of its National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) last month, which showed that over 80 percent of urine samples tested by the CDC contained glyphosate.
Glyphosate is a widely used herbicide and is the active ingredient in the popular Roundup brand, among others, as it is highly effective at managing invasive and noxious weeds.
NHANES, which began in the early 1960s, is a program of studies that are designed to assess the health and nutritional status of adults and children across the country.
The survey found glyphosate in 1,885 of 2,310 urine samples collected from people aged 6 years and older in 2013 and 2014. Nearly a third of the samples came from kids, ranging in age from 6 to 18.
Food is the main route of exposure to glyphosate for children aged 18 and under, according to CDC researchers. Given that the herbicide is used as a pre-harvest drying agent, or crop desiccant—a chemical applied to crops to dry them out more quickly before harvest—the pesticide is highly likely to make its way into foods.
HOWEVER
Since glyphosate was first registered, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has continuously reviewed and reassessed its safety and uses, most recently releasing an interim decision for registration review in January 2020.
‘Unlikely to Be a Human Carcinogen’
According to the EPA, the agency, “continues to find that there are no risks of concern to human health when glyphosate is used in accordance with its current label.”
“EPA also found that glyphosate is unlikely to be a human carcinogen.”
RELATED Amazon Launches Clinical Trials for Development of Personalized Vaccine for Breast and Skin Cancer Amazon Launches Clinical Trials for Development of Personalized Vaccine for Breast and Skin Cancer
However, there continues to be intense debate about whether or not glyphosate is indeed carcinogenic.
Lawsuits Pile Up
Glyphosate was first used in the Roundup herbicide developed by Monsanto in 1974 and marketed until 2018, when the German company Bayer A.G. bought Monsanto for $63 billion.
However, Bayer has faced tens of thousands of lawsuits by people—predominantly those working in agriculture, maintenance, and landscaping industries that are likely to be significantly more exposed to the chemical—claiming that Roundup and other glyphosate-based herbicides caused their cancer.
Among the cancer claims, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the same form of cancer highlighted in the 2019 U.S. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry analysis, is prevalent.
Plaintiffs argue that the company failed to adequately warn the public about health risks associated with glyphosate and Roundup.
Bayer maintains the product is safe but announced last year that it would replace glyphosate from all lawn and garden products sold in the United States by 2023.
“It is important for the company, our owners, and our customers that we move on and put the uncertainty and ambiguity related to the glyphosate litigation behind us,” Bayer CEO Werner Baumann said in a statement at the time.
Last month, the U.S. Supreme Court denied Bayer A.G.’s appeal to review a million-dollar lawsuit filed by a Californian man who is suing the company, alleging that over 20 years of Roundup use has caused him to develop cancer.
The move paves the way for thousands more lawsuits against the company to ensue.
www.theepochtimes.com/cancer-linked-herbicide-chemical-found-in-over-80-percent-of-us-urine-samples-cdc-study_4592044.html
US Court Case Affidavits of UCSC Professor Daniel Sheehan on CIA drug smuggling and its purposes see link below
http://www.ncoic.com/heroin-2.htm
George Orwell 1984
‘He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past.’
‘The masses never revolt of their own accord, and they never revolt merely because they are oppressed. Indeed, so long as they are not permitted to have standards of comparison, they never even become aware that they are oppressed.’
‘Power is in tearing human minds to pieces and putting them together again in new shapes of your own choosing.’
UCSC University Lectures - Prof D Sheehan
Lecture #17
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WnRd_bSTdoA
Other lectures
https://archive.org/details/UCSCJFKCourseWDanielSheehan
For other information on CIA and drugs info see below
https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKsheehan.htm
https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/5644-the-cia-and-the-politics-of-heroin/
https://2ndsmartestguyintheworld.substack.com/p/big-pharma-boss-caught-faking-his?s=r
Dr. Sousa-Faro is one of almost 2,200 celebrities and European elites who have been falsely recorded as vaccinated against Covid, according to a list compiled by National Police.
Jose Maria Fernandez Sousa-Faro, president of European pharmaceuticals giant PharmaMar, has been charged by police with being falsely vaccinated against Covid-19. Dr. Sousa-Faro has been caught up in a scandal in Europe involving people being added to the National Immunization Registry in exchange for large sums of money, with many of them familiar faces and household names.
Police allege that Sousa-Faro arranged to be injected with a saline solution instead of a Covid-19 vaccination and paid thousands of dollars to have his name added to Spain’s immunization register, as confirmed by police sources and reported by El Periodico de Espana.
According to El Mundo, Spanish police carried out the investigation called Operation Jenner which uncovered the vast network of celebrities and elites who have paid money to have their names fraudulently entered on the National Immunization Register
January 11, 2022
PharmaMar shares soar after drug study suggests efficacy against Omicron
https://www.occrp.org/en/daily/15854-spain-dismantles-fake-covid-19-passport-ring
Spain Dismantles Fake Covid-19 Passport Ring Print articlePublished: 27 January 2022
Authorities say that the suspects illicitly entered the personal information of 1,600 people into Spain’s National Vaccination Registry to allow customers to circumvent the country’s public health mandates.
Australian tennis star Alex de Minaur denies he is under investigation for buying fake Covid-19 vaccination results Alex de Minaur has refuted claims he is under investigation as part of a wider probe into fake Covid-19 passports.
February 18, 2022 -
Australia’s No.1 men’s tennis player appears on a list of alleged buyers but said he was connected “simply because I was a patient” at the same Madrid hospital Spanish police are investigating.
The investigation What is interesting is that the police did not uncover the scam through a local investigation, but rather through efforts to curb extremism on the dark web.
Enter policeman A, his name has not been made public. According to the Guardia Civil he made contact with an extremist Islamic group who he arranged to meet in France, but told them that he personally could not travel as he had not been vaccinated.
He said: “I don’t have a COVID-19 passport; I am not vaccinated. Allah does not allow me to put anything impure in my body.”
They replied that they could get him a passport and even get him registered on the National Registry of Vaccination
https://www-elmundo-es.translate.goog/cronica/2021/04/13/6070a589fdddff26128b469c.html
April 2021 PharmaMar trials on Covid Treatment
LAST RESOURCE The compassionate use of drugs is increasingly requested Tragedy 'without compassion' in the PharmaMar family Her name was Belén, she was the sister-in-law of the president of the company that finds remedies for illnesses in the sea. She fell ill with Covid, her relatives asked for her the compassionate use of the antiviral discovered by PharmaMar. She died without being able to take it
Aplidin: Cancer Drug Treats COVID-19 30x Better Than remdesivir | Observer
The discovery of Aplidin's effect in treating COVID-19 was not a result of random screening, like a lot of lab tests in the early days of the pandemic. Scientists at UC San Francisco found the drug...
https://www.thesouthafrican.com › news › what-is-aplidin-new-covid-treatment-how-works-plitidepsin-latest
Aplidin to the rescue? Promising new COVID drug 'cuts viral load by 99%'
In Spain, 45 patients with COVID-19 took Aplidin during the first human trials. They found that the drug reduced the amount of time they spent in the hospital, with 81% of patients returning home...
Beware of totalitarian control of scientific and medical thought here in America. Prominent academic publications, medical organizations, and even some state legislatures are trying to silence scientific disagreements about COVID-19. That will kill medical progress.
On Friday, Anthony Fauci, the face of the federal government’s COVID response, urged graduates at Roger Williams University in Rhode Island to stand up against disinformation and “the normalization of untruths” about COVID-19. Let’s hope graduates were too busy tossing their mortar boards skyward to heed Fauci’s dangerous advice.
It’s dangerous because there is no such thing as scientific certainty about COVID-19 or any other disease. Challenging scientific consensus is not “disinformation.” It’s how medical breakthroughs happen.
Today’s unorthodox treatment might become tomorrow’s lifesaving standard of care. Crushing scientific dissenters is a sure way to halt medical progress in its tracks.
Fauci claimed recently on national television that those who criticize him are “really criticizing science because I represent science.” His egotism is enormous, but the problem is bigger than just Fauci.
Experience the best way to read The Epoch Times online. Try our free app for a limited time.
The American Medical Association voted in November to target health care professionals who “peddled untested treatments and cures, and flouted public health efforts such as masking and vaccinations.” Warning about “disinformation,” the AMA called on state medical boards to suspend or revoke the offenders’ licenses.
Don’t Let Big Brother Silence Scientific Debate
What We Know so Far About Salvador Ramos, Alleged Texas School Mass Shooter
A Nature Medicine review article decreed on March 10 that “the spread of misinformation poses a considerable threat to public health and the successful management of a global pandemic.”
Wrong.
Scientific progress has always been a struggle between the status quo and those who challenge it and seek new knowledge.
When Galileo advanced Copernicus’s idea that Earth revolves around the sun, he was labeled a heretic by the astronomical establishment and the Catholic Church and put under house arrest.
When Hungarian physician Ignaz Semmelweis observed that women were dying in childbirth because physicians in the obstetric hospitals were not washing their hands, physicians took offense. He was committed to an insane asylum in 1865 and died there, a victim of the establishment’s censorship. His research showed that hand washing with chlorinated lime could reduce deaths below 1 percent, but its importance was not understood at the time.
Later, these heretics became recognized as heroes.
Fast-forward to the 1980s, when the AIDS virus began to spread rapidly in the United States Fauci led that research effort. It was the beginning of an explosion of new treatments.
Yet two years ago, when COVID-19 struck—a disease as unfamiliar as AIDS was in ’80s—the impulse among government health officials was to suppress experimentation and debate.
Democratic lawmakers in California are pushing to require the state medical board to penalize doctors for spreading “misinformation,” defined as disagreeing with government bodies like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or “contemporary scientific consensus.”
As Wall Street Journal’s Allysia Finley points out, that would mean legal penalties against doctors who prescribe drugs like the antidepressant Fluvoxamine, which has shown strong results in clinical trials even though it is not yet Food and Drug Administration-approved for use expressly against COVID-19.
The standard of care to save COVID-19 patients has evolved rapidly, explains Finley. At the outset, doctors put severely ill patients on ventilators, where as many as 90 percent died. Soon, some doctors tried oxygenating patients with high-flow nasal tubes instead, and that succeeded. Should those doctors have been penalized for trying an alternative?
In October 2020, three distinguished scientists from Harvard University, the University of Oxford and Stanford University published the Great Barrington Declaration, arguing that economically devastating lockdowns being imposed across the U.S. and Europe would save fewer lives than precautions targeted at the elderly and medically fragile only. Yet they were right.
Nothing, not even a virus, is as dangerous to our future health as this silencing of medical debate. All of us, of every political persuasion, must denounce it for our own sakes.
Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Betsy McCaughey, Ph.D., is a political commentator, constitutional expert, syndicated columnist, and author of several books, including “The Obama Health Law: What It Says and How to Overturn It,” and “The Next Pandemic.” She is also a former lieutenant governor of New York.
https://m.theepochtimes.com/dont-let-big-brother-silence-scientific-debate_4493220.html
Top 10 Videos True Dangers of the Spike Protein, and How to Detoxify Yourself From It
What Are They Hiding?—Dr. Robert Malone on the Pfizer Documents and Evidence of Cardiotoxicity, Birth Defects, and the Rise in All-Cause Mortality
What Are They Hiding?—Dr. Robert Malone on the Pfizer Documents and Evidence of Cardiotoxicity, Birth Defects, and the Rise in All-Cause Mortality
Ex-WHO Scientist David Bell: Will New Pandemic Treaty Cause Permanent Lockdowns?
Ex-WHO Scientist David Bell: Will New Pandemic Treaty Cause Permanent Lockdowns?
Monkeypox Outbreak Follows ‘Germ-Game’ Preparations;
Media Falsify ‘2000 Mules’ Claims in Georgia Monkeypox Outbreak Follows
Inside the Michael Sussmann Trial—Kash Patel Talks ‘October Surprise’; Fusion GPS Employee Testimony; Rodney Joffe | Kash’s Corner
Monkeypox Narrative Is Built on Lies; Is Biden’s ‘Incredible Transition’ to Let Gas Collapse?
Hillary Clinton Approved Trump-Russia Leak to Media; Clinton Campaign Lawyer ‘Manipulating the FBI’; Biden Manufacturing a Political Enemy? Clinton Campaign Lawyer Twitter Exposed Hans Von Spakovsky Election Fraud Is Organized and Nationwide:
A dozen liberal groups that pressured Twitter advertisers to boycott the platform in response to Elon Musk’s plans to acquire it received money from entities backed by Bill Gates and George Soros, an analysis of public filings shows.
In early May, a group of 26 organizations penned a public letter claiming that the Tesla CEO’s takeover of Twitter would “be a direct threat to public safety” and turn the platform into “a cesspool of misinformation.” The letter called for Twitter’s top advertisers to “hold [Musk] to account” by committing to “non-negotiable” standards for doing business with the site, one of which is to not restore the accounts of political and public figures banned for “egregious violations of Twitter Rules.” The letter contained the logos of Accountable Tech, Media Matters for America, and UltraViolet Action.
An analysis of the public filings and records shows that at least 11 of the letter’s signatories or their affiliated groups have taken money from organizations funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. One of the three groups leading the letter has received over $1 million from billionaire financer George Soros’s grant-making network Open Society Foundations, while the two others were founded in part by former staffers for Barak Obama and Hilary Clinton.
Eight signatories also collected roughly $10.25 million in federal grants and loans between 2020 and 2021, public records show.
The New Venture Fund, the recipient of more than $500 million in grants from the Gates Foundation since 2012, in 2020 gave $180,000 in total to two signees, Media Matters for America and Center for Media Justice. Another $11.2 million of the New Venture Fund’s 2020 grant money went to North Fund, a shadowy progressive nonprofit based in Washington that funnels money to a number of other activist groups, including Accountable Tech, which published the letter.
Accountable Tech’s website shows that two members on its team—its co-founder and digital director—worked for Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign. Founded in 2004, Media Matters for America describes itself as a “progressive research and information center dedicated to comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative misinformation in the U.S. media.” A key function of the organization is to provide tools for monitoring what it considers to be “conservative misinformation,” which it defines to be “news or commentary that is not accurate, reliable, or credible and that forwards the conservative agenda.”
