Glad to see some people recognizing grifters.
Hmmm... is it coincidental that the people in govt whose "politics" you love (assuming Gaetz is on your list, too) frequently share completely false information without taking any care to corroborate it?
Weird that the public-facing Q-friendly crowd in electoral politics tends to lie/spread disinformation (MTG), break the law (Gaetz) and say that "no reasonable person" would take their claims as fact (Powell).
Yes, that's it.. Feel the cognitive dissonance flow through you... come up with excuses... do anything it takes to reassure yourself that your pre-conceived beliefs are true. Don't try to genuinely investigate anything, just take what you like as fact.
copied from here https://www.pnas.org/content/102/33/11876
The contents of the email are from this paper (https://www.pnas.org/content/102/33/11876), published over 10 years ago, which was a study on coronaviruses (a GENERAL TYPE OF VIRUS, not a term created to refer to COVID-19).
Has NOTHING to do with COVID-19. Do a little bit of critical thinking, I'm begging you.
She does NOT know more than you. She's braindead.
Also curious as to what makes this interesting? Seeing something that, if true, would be a smoking gun that confirms a long-held belief of mine, would only be interesting to me if I felt confident that it were true.
Yes, all of the medical-sounding terminology was directly copied from published medical studies from as far back as 2010.
OK, sorry it just bothers me to see information like this posted wantonly - because, and you must know this, more than an insignificant number of people will see this image and accept it as fact, so disinformation informs their actions and beliefs in the future. It's dangerous imo.
Maybe I'll take a look into those fauci emails
this is lazy.... Is every single person on this website too lazy to do a google search? Search any phrase from the so-called email within double quotes on google (i.e. "of HIV-gfp particles incorporating ASLV") and you will IMMEDIATELY discover that all of the contents of this email were ripped from academic papers/abstracts. Come on guys, try to be rigorous about what you take as fact JUST A LITTLE BIT.
Address my claims or I have nothing to say to you. What's incorrect about them?