If MSM/Pharma decides to finally acknowledge the truth and release the following 2 information:

1. HCQ/Ivermectin worked for COVID all along and this information was intentionally kept away from everyone!
2. COVID was created for the Vaccines/voter mail fraud and that vaccines have potential serious known and unknown side effects!

Which of the above information will help DJT more?

Also, we have to keep in mind that DJT was not responsible for the contents of the vaccines and was only involved in the administrative side of getting the vaccines out which he did in 9 months as part of Operation Warp Speed to end all lockdowns and save lives!

https://rumble.com/v26if3a-devolution-power-hour-115-featuring-patrick-gunnels-sat-1030-pm-et-.html

Watch from 51:00 onwards!

Short summary:

1. DJT knew that some variant of flu was about to hit America and started preparing through EO's from 2019 itself.

2. The FDA approved the vaccines and DJT had no role in the production or the science behind the production of vaccines.

3. DJT is claiming credit for Operation WARP Speed which ensured that the vaccine was deployed within 9 months which would have otherwise taken 5-10 years and thus lockdowns were avoided and millions of lives were saved.

4. DJT never mandated any vaccines and always supported alternative treatments like HCQ and others which were opposed by the MSM.

5. DJT is going with the MSM/Pharma narrative of the effectiveness and the safety of the vaccines. He is claiming whatever the media/pharma is saying and keeping himself immune from whatever is happening as a result of the science behind the vaccines.

KM voted in favor of investigation for the 2020 election fraud on Jan 6, 2021 and is therefore not named as Defendant in the Brunson Case. This for me is the biggest proof that he is actually not a RINO and is a sleeper waiting to be activated. Let's see what happens!

Anons have been well trained over the years not to react to dates or what seems like important events/markers. At the same time, it is always exciting to look forward to something big that seems possible. For Brunson Case, the one thing that stands out for me is the 1/6 conference date. If SCOTUS had to dismiss it, they could have kept it for conference on 12/2 or 12/9 and be over it without creating this noise. Let's see what happens!

Just one more day for 1/6 and decision by SCOTUS in Brunson Case. Is it all part of the plan?

1. One logical explanation seems to be that because DJT is strongly supporting McCarthy, DEMS cannot endorse him and therefore he would never be able to get the required votes!

                    OR
   

2. McCarthy is a sleeper. DJT wants Dems to support him to win the position of Speaker so that when he brings down the Hammer on Dems, it looks impartial!

I think people who are opposing this case are looking at it from purely procedural point of view and this is not how Supreme Court does things.

Others who are supporting the case are looking at it from national importance point of view.

Read this article below from a professor teaching constitutional law:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/tim-canova-supreme-court-considers-case-seeking-overturn-2020-presidential-election/

Also, check this video of a constitutional law expert explaining the complaint filed in the Brunson case in detail:

https://rumble.com/v235yf8-constitutional-law-part-ii-the-brunson-brothers-lawsuit-before-the-supreme-.html

As per allegations in the complaint (which is being explained in this above video), there are 31 states that have violated election laws. I don't think there is any other Court which can decide this issue other than SCOTUS?

The people opposing this case may be right that based on past history, SCOTUS will not get involved in this case. But IMO, if they want to get involved, they have full authority and jurisdiction to take action in this case!

Let's see what happens!

"The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. The Constitution requires a two-thirds supermajority to convict a person being impeached."

So I just did the math and realized that the number of members of Congress who are respondents in the Brunson Case are: 291/435 for House which is 66.9% (more than two-thirds) and 94/100 for Senate which is 94% (again more than two-thirds) which is the minimum number required as per constitution for conviction after impeachment. Can it just be a coincidence or do these numbers mean something? Does it give extra power to SCOTUS to remove these members while ruling on the Brunson Case?

I think up till now, we are looking at the Brunson case from a Bottom-up approach.

We are assuming that these Brunson brothers are ordinary average American citizens who have managed to docket this most important case in US history to the Supreme Court by chance. What if Trump/White hats are running the show behind the scenes? Few points to support this theory are:

1. The brothers were famous in their career and did shows all over. So technically, you can't call them ordinary average citizens?

2. Due to their status, they even performed for President Ronald Raegan and could have easily built political connections over time?

3. One of the brothers Loy Brunson even ran for Senate and was definitely politically inclined?

4. Loy Brunson asks Donald Trump Questions at Freedomfest (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ek5ehj968nE). So definitely could have connected with Trump?

5. DJT is absolutely silent on this case when he is the biggest beneficiary? No leaks?

6. Timing of this case. Conference on 1/6? Kari Lake Arizona election about to be over-turned by court?

7. Loy Brunson has admitted in one of his interviews that the brothers are protected by special forces and have even visited Mar-a-Lago?

Coincidences?

Announcement of VP pick by DJT? I guess DJT will need new VP after the SCOTUS Brunson v Adams 22-380 Case and he wants to avoid any confusion about VP when SCOTUS removes Pence along with 387 others while reinstating DJT as president as part of the ruling!

Is Elon Musk building the narrative to expose the truth about election interference and fraud so that SCOTUS can take the right decision ?