The last time I was really involved there were tons of cool tools. Stuff for artists and digital art, and record keeping for antiques/art, I guess really what I am saying is that you would just have to look. It just doesn't have to be just 'money'.
That's was about when I dropped off my research. Life got in the way.
I spent time trying to develop an outline for a governing and voting program, to write legislation live for the population to watch, while also enabling fact checking and other means of correction and editing for qualified individuals, backed by a reputation based profile....like a public resume. Using socials and green cards for ID varification of individuals. Something very open that allows the public some entry into the bill writing process, and a way to eliminate unnecessary and wasteful content.
Well, upholding a network that makes it overwhelmingly challenging to hack due to the vastness, not even just for cryptos, sounds like a good way to secure, perhaps....a voting blockchain?
Okay so aside from the complicated mathematical explanation portion, I'm pretty familiar with the content of the white paper. ?
Oh yeah the double spending start...
Never in it's entirety. Realize that's a weird thing to skip....and I just never circled back. Probably should.
Investing is nice, but I am in it for the tech. Blockchain is the future of management.
Decentralize is suppose to mean the power is out of the hands of the few....and in the hands of all? It is almost like a form of democracy? (I question myself because this is speaking without observing a literal definition)
Thank you. Agreed.
As a crypto researcher I'm well aware of all this, but it's literally not built to be a transaction coin, Bitcoin was just an idea when it was developed, and it's the first of its kind ever developed, but to think that it's the end all be all for the future of money is a little off landish because it would need a lot of altering for it to be a successful crypto.
Hilariously I love to speak for crypto but own less than $1000. I like the idea in the design of blockchain technology for cryptocurrency, but honestly it is just a suspicious as everybody claims it to be.
Way more in the loop than me. And I agree it's wrong to replace the dollar. Fuck that.
Deepstate realized it could be used for evil. And fuck that entirely.
And we only say that because eth is required for the transactions of tokens....
I won't even mess with USDT. It brings me a lot of concern because I don't know anything about it, other than that they don't even have the value of the US dollar to support it.
So mining is actually the act of running your computer to run the encryptions for a cryptocurrency. You become the transaction hub to confirm an occurring transaction. A crypto will have a certain rate in which the coin is produced, for example a coin can choose to be minted once every hour, they might have five coins minted during that hour, but in addition to the five coins being minted, the miners also are distributed all transaction fees for helping support the network through running the encryption software on their computer.
Does interest me a lot that he isn't a fan. Though he wants to use blockchain for the social platform!!! Very interesting.
As I've heard. But anon is anon still, and a user name with a translation still isn't grounds for me to be swayed. Maybe one day something decisive comes out, I'd like to know the truth.
Never stop buying gold and silver bro.
I literally just elaborated that it's not really good to use for transactions, and while there are coins that are made for transactions they're very limited for platforms.
I am not here to shill for crypto, I just think education is important. The idea of decentralized cryptos is to create currency, or ways to send value for less than going through 3rd party systems like PayPal where they take a huge slice of your value. It isn't meant to take over. It's just another tool, one that gives amazing transparency and a clear ledger of spending. If that scares you, maybe you aren't on the right website for truths.
Someone fucking gets it, thank you.
Well as I just said, Bitcoin itself is an asset not really meant to be spent as a currency. Others will be...but only for their platform and with whom they have agreements with.
In the end Bitcoin is supposed to be an asset coin not a transaction coin it wasn't developed for that, and other cryptos are created for transactions so why would you use Bitcoin which is definitely archaic compared to the other designs? They just want to move large amounts of value around, that's all it's good for.
The whole point of cryptocurrencies is transparency You're always supposed to be trackable, duh!
There are also games and apps that can run off of the technology.