Well I will say I do appreciate your candidness in sharing.

I think that if somebody idenitifies with Q that's similar to say, identifying with a religion, so therefore if you believe everything they say you believe they are real and true so you have to prove that (not saying you as in you but a hypothetical person who would be indentifying with Q).

I understand that picking out specific examples kind of seems like cherrypicking but at the same time, if those examples have been proven incorrect then that really does muddy the water on what exactly is supposed to be believed and what isn't. And if, for example, Q is suddenly proven to not be a government insider (which is up in the air because I don't think he's ever attempted to prove it) then that's pretty big and everything he said would fall apart.

I can see how you're kind of split on it after Q's claims about the election didn't come to pass and that you're kind of tracking it at the same time to see if anything happens. I would like to just say that if something Q does say truly happens, maybe think about it. If Q says, for example, that John McCain was going to die, maybe that was going to happen anyways (seeing as he had cancer before Q predicted this)? And that's an old example but the point is still there. Maybe you already know that though. You seem rational compared to others I've talked to who just... aren't really, maybe they're not all there.

I'm not saying Q is absolutely fake, I can't prove absolutely that he isn't a government insider. On the other hand, it's on Q to prove that to me before I believe him (he has the burden of proof after all). Right now I'm saying that there's a 99 percent chance this is fake. But keep searching for yourself. I don't mean to put myself in an authoritative position or be the one giving you advice but it seems like you're on a good path right now.