Usually when I see Q post, they never seem to argue the validity of Q it’s self, they just post very interesting findings and “coincidences.” Yet, the attackers usually go in and attack Q’s validity with stupid shit like “Trust Sessions!” not ever questioning the info being presented to them. It screams classic commie tactics to me, screams “I’m a leftie shill paid by big tech to yell at people posting Q stuff.” Just sayin.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
isn’t the crux of Q based on time travel? how else would the predictions and events line up the way they seem? i think many people have a hard time with that idea
It’s not really, never has Q mentioned time travel other than a post which referenced a Twitter thread were the people were speculating Q being a time traveler because of the deltas that Q said would come from Twitter. Deltas meaning the time difference between the Q post and a Trump tweet The post reads as follows: [link to twitter thread] Time travel is fun Or...
The “Or...” signifying that no, it’s not time travel, the reason he’s able to get the specifics on when Trump is tweeting is because he is indeed close to the President.
It’s supposed to be a meticulously planned thing.
nah, it’s more than planning. i don’t think that’s all that “deltas” refer to
What happened to good old fashioned oracles who could read the future? Oh that's right the climate doomers gave crystal ball readers a bad name! Now I have to pretend to be a time traveller because admitting you have precognition is soooo uncool nowadays........ (The real question is....am I joking???)
ah yeah. thank you
Quantum computing allows super fast and complex war-gaming - so you can sort of predict the future.
Watched a video of a former military agent whose job it was to supposedly work on that stuff (forgot his name). He said the other side (Illuminati/globalists) also has the technology. Once their war games hit 2012, no matter what they did, the outcome was always the same (and good guys won). He said they know it, and they know we know it. Everything they do is a sort of thrashing about to try and change the outcome - but apparently it will be to no avail.
I make no claim about the veracity of what he was saying, just reporting what he was saying. Very interesting.
I saw that interview as well. I think it was from around 2012 or so. He was talking about project looking glass. Q has also used the phrase "Through the looking glass" several times which some interpret as a hint that the Q team may be using it. I found it very interesting that the AI from the latest season of Westworld was essentially the machine from project looking glass and the plot was an AI trying to keep an "event" (In Westworld's case, civilization ending) from happening. This seems to be exactly what the man being interviewed was talking about. As we know the cabal likes to use science fiction in movies to subliminally invalidate truths. Basically, the guy in the interview was saying that he was brought in sometime in the mid to late 90's to look at the data and try to discover ways to stop the "event" from happening. He said they could speed it up or delay the event but they could never stop it. He then discovered that the "event" was more or less the great awakening (not the words he used but essentially what he described.) That there was a point where the Cabal's "dam" that has been holding back information from humanity would break and the cabal would no longer have control of the flow of information. This would lead to a future that they no longer could predict or control. This is what they feared. So the "event" he discovered was bad for the Cabal not necessarily humanity.
I have also heard this referred to as "the singularity". Elon Musk talks about it fairly often in interviews. His version is that humanity is well on its way or already become a collective consciousness. That this will lead to an unknown outcome, that in his mind, has an unknown probability of being either good or bad. In this scenario humanity becomes hyper connected and collectively performs much in the same way neural pathways do in the brain. A "net good" outcome however depends on information flowing uninhibited, which we know currently is not the case. We are currently like neural synapses with bad pathways, ie we are being inhibited from effectively communicating. However I see evidence that we are in the process of building better pathways for communication. We are beginning to circumvent big tech's censorship in a number of ways. This site as well as a few others are proof of that.
In my view they are both essentially the same. In the first view however the "good guys" are in control and the as the interviewee put it, we are watching two chess masters (the Cabal vs "the good guys), play out the final moves of the game, both can see far enough ahead to know that the Cabal has lost, its just a matter of playing out the final moves. As for the other scenario described by Elon, humanity is reaching a precipice and a point of no return where we are rapidly approaching the great filter or the second birth of humanity. I guess time will tell. However I do see evidence of the great awakening happening all around us, so I am cautiously optimistic.
hmm ok thank you
NO. Separate the Q drops from all the sci-fi bullshit that is being used to discredit Q itself. Just stick to the drops, and research where they lead.