Usually when I see Q post, they never seem to argue the validity of Q it’s self, they just post very interesting findings and “coincidences.” Yet, the attackers usually go in and attack Q’s validity with stupid shit like “Trust Sessions!” not ever questioning the info being presented to them. It screams classic commie tactics to me, screams “I’m a leftie shill paid by big tech to yell at people posting Q stuff.” Just sayin.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
I'm a TDW wanderer, been there since it was hatched, refugee from reddit t_d. All-in for Trump since Golden Escalator Day and would go to war again for him if asked. I wasnt familiar with much Q beyond the top-level headlines until this year, actually a few weeks ago when there were just too many things lining up to ignore. Right now, because my curiosity got me pulling strings to find more, or from where it originated, corroboration, logic, I'm sitting on the edge of my seat, fully expecting a monumental series of events but also expecting to be even more amazed than I thought I would be. I know only 1 thing with certainty - that Trump isnt a reckless gambler, he would not talk shit from a position of anything short of certainty, and I believe that when he hints at something great about to happen, he's doing so because it's already did. No - you wont get any ridicule from me. Not at all.