Usually when I see Q post, they never seem to argue the validity of Q it’s self, they just post very interesting findings and “coincidences.” Yet, the attackers usually go in and attack Q’s validity with stupid shit like “Trust Sessions!” not ever questioning the info being presented to them. It screams classic commie tactics to me, screams “I’m a leftie shill paid by big tech to yell at people posting Q stuff.” Just sayin.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (45)
sorted by:
Not OP but my background is in applied psychology so this sounds really interesting. I have yet to meet someone as keen on conspiracies, the occult, suppressed information, etc as I am. IRL, I should clarify. A few of my friends showed interest over the years, but eventually dropped off. For example, I have a friend who gave me a copy of Behold A Pale Horse a few years ago. We both read it and discussed the contents. But something happened and she is extremely liberal and buys into any msm disinformation-story she finds now. It has baffled me how one could seemingly accept the claims in that book while also believing in such ridiculous false narratives like Russian collusion. Perhaps this "chaotic unknown" is too uncomfortable to ponder for long. At any rate, another hole to dive down. Thanks for the tip! Don't know my enneagram but Im an INTJ or ENFP depending on the day (almost 50-50 introversion/extroversion and judging/perceiving).