So, Vaccine 1.0 is a hoax?
(threadreaderapp.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
They isolated the virus here in Australia. In theory MRNA vaccines should be superior to antigen vaccines that often stimulate the wrong kind of immune response. That's consistent with seeing strong adverse reactions. The problem is we have just witnessed a massive conspiracy both with HCQ and now the election coup. So no way in hell I take this at the moment. (And I'm mostly pro vaccine)
I hate to be that guy, but please provide the literature that demonstrates pure isolation of the virus itself, not rna sequences or antibodies/proteins associated with the virus. To my knowledge, the virus in its entirety has not been isolated. But we all know the vaccines were being developed a year ago when they were given the genetic sequence for this thing before they released it. Drug development does not happen this fast, particularly on a "novel" pathogen.
And for the record, I am not an anti-vaccer. I'm anti-this-vaccine.
https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2020/212/10/isolation-and-rapid-sharing-2019-novel-coronavirus-sars-cov-2-first-patient It was big news here in Aussie land but probably didn't make it your way. Plus it was originally referred to as novel CV before it got its official name, so its not picked up by searches.
I appreciate you providing that. I've never seen it announced over here.
But here is the problem with it, and it could be semantics...
"Inoculation of Vero/hSLAM cells with material from the nasopharyngeal swab led to the isolation of SARS‐CoV‐2 virus in culture. Electron microscopy of the supernatant confirmed the presence of virus particles with morphology characteristic of viruses of the family Coronaviridae."
Isolated in culture means it's still in a soup. And they "confirmed" it by idenitfying particles characteristic of the Coronaviridae family".
The literature I have read, and that could also be biased, too, stands by the claim that the virus itself has not been singularly isolated, just parts of it (rna strands or proteins found in most coronavirus strains...ie: the common cold).
This is one of the main reasons it is so difficult to test for it reliably. They rely on the presence of rna strands that need to be amplified to "prove" the virus is present. Anybody with a common cold a year before the test can theoretically come back "positive to Covid-19" if they amplify the test enough (sometimes on the order of 10 x43 power). If they had the virus, the test would be definitive
Also of the 3 vaccines I'd probably go the Oxford. There's a reason the Russians stole it. Still slight chances of autoimmune complications from the carrier virus and made using cell culture which some people dislike. Moderna over fizer even if it looked like a self promotion scam initially. Otherwise Vit D and sleep if your low risk and don't want to risk it. (Wise choice IMO)