Anon Q Warn
am I grasping at straws, or is there something more here with the name?
was this a white hat or black hat patsy? was this a warning from Anon Q? or a warning to Anon Q? January 6th?
also, how did FBI get DNA turned over so fast? I thought that type of testing wasn't CSI Las Vegas fast, i.e. it took a few days.
Just trying to have an understanding and be cognizant of what is going on around me.
The assessment at the scene is laughable. Not one officer on scene is seen to approach the vehicle, no chatter on comms about it either, they just accept it at face value that there is in fact an explosive device in the vehicle. If they didn't approach the vehicle, how did they knew who it belonged to? Did they run the plates, check the reg? That should be an immediate return who owned it. If he owned it/registered it then he had to have a driver's license to register. Back to the explosion, how did officers on scene know how big blast would be? Cordoned off area was awfully close to blast zone. You could get an awful lot of boom boom into a class c motorhome, a few thousand pounds if you were really motivated. Who knew what the composition was? I say that because, this unknown device in an unknown vehicle pointed to a known person awfully quickly. If they didn't approach/ run plate, how did they know whose vehicle it was? They found "his" DNA on scene? Boy that was a fast test, did they check for COVID too? I'm sure it's more real than the Maury paternity test. "We ran a test, turns out you are the bomber."