says the person who hasnt invented shit! lol

They signaled out CueCat but what about all these?

https://patents.justia.com/inventor/jovan-hutton-pulitzer

So he had one product that failed, that makes him stupid? No comments on news sites anymore! Tired of looking stupid I guess!

www theverge com's T.C. Sottek who authored this is nothing but propogandist, hack, stooge, useful idiot whose career as a credible journalist is over, but has earned his bowl of gruel working for the Ministry of Propaganda.

Sottek show's political bias by avoiding the obvious.

Pulitizer's program can analyze the actual physical ballot and through machine learning and AI determine whether or not fraud exists and to the degree it exists.

1. difference in paper source
2. ballots have been folded
3. ballot marks are hand made, machine made, same hand made
4. etc

This "simple" tool eliminates all the complexities that have served the DS narrative.

"Simple" for the those that are in the game of forensic data, database analysis, evidence analysis. The fact that all ballots are by law to be uniform, these uniformed ballots can be then analyzed by existing software algorithms that detect patterns. Image/pattern recognition from tobacco stains to shapes in marks. Optics, resolution, advanced computer speed support the incredible power of program analytics. What the DS fear most is transparency by objective independent critique, allowing someone on the caliber of Pulitzer to analyze the physical ballots. Too bad they only allowed the analysis at the most milk toast county and not Fulton.

As an inventor, you have winners and losers. In fact, the failures are the runway to the successes.

Picking on one invention sure seems desperate, especially since it has nothing to do with the evidence of election fraud. He pointed out 3 things.

1. Mail-in ballot printed differently in dem vs. gop areas. This seems to be so that the machine would give error messages in affect indicating that it couldn’t read it. Then those votes are thrown into adjudication folder Which then somebody other than the voter decides. There were about 107,000 mail in ballots and something like 103,000 were adjudicated in Fulton county.

2. He is able to determine fraud if see the real physical ballots. He has much background in this including with counterfeit money.

3. He hacked into the system while live voting is happening. I believe he does have proof and the SOS is choosing to omit that information. It was not just the voter rolls, which, if you think about it, being able to mess with voter rolls is damning in itself.

Oh, and this is their best effort at Debonking his testimony. They really can’t do it.

They are a team of monkeys working around the clock to manufacture any kind of bad publicity their puny brains can muster.