www theverge com's T.C. Sottek who authored this is nothing but propogandist, hack, stooge, useful idiot whose career as a credible journalist is over, but has earned his bowl of gruel working for the Ministry of Propaganda.

Sottek show's political bias by avoiding the obvious.

Pulitizer's program can analyze the actual physical ballot and through machine learning and AI determine whether or not fraud exists and to the degree it exists.

1. difference in paper source
2. ballots have been folded
3. ballot marks are hand made, machine made, same hand made
4. etc

This "simple" tool eliminates all the complexities that have served the DS narrative.

"Simple" for the those that are in the game of forensic data, database analysis, evidence analysis. The fact that all ballots are by law to be uniform, these uniformed ballots can be then analyzed by existing software algorithms that detect patterns. Image/pattern recognition from tobacco stains to shapes in marks. Optics, resolution, advanced computer speed support the incredible power of program analytics. What the DS fear most is transparency by objective independent critique, allowing someone on the caliber of Pulitzer to analyze the physical ballots. Too bad they only allowed the analysis at the most milk toast county and not Fulton.