Lurker here. flame me maybe. Not into, and havent followed religiously hardcore fringe conspiracy theories for quite some time but.....reading several correlative Q posts over a year and twatter habits. It appears to me based on content and substance L Wood is Q. is this OLD news? I havent found any connection stating otherwise. If this is widely known forgive the ignorance of ultimate awakened internet supremacy of known knowledge but this appears quite obvious. If this is not widely known. Thoughts? correlative light to dark and occasional christian references amongst the undeniable content of intended thought provocation questioning each and and every time appears obvious to me
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (40)
sorted by:
There’s more anecdotal evidence to suggest Scavino is Q, which I don’t believe either...
But you admit yourself that you haven’t followed Q since the beginning but if you had you would not have come to the conclusion you have.... I would suggest you go back to Q from early 2018 maybe a bit before and you will get a clearer idea as to why Wood cannot be Q or part of the Q team....
Wood comes across like a Q follower not Q himself....
WWG1WGA
I did do this on a historical post matter. Correlation was not as evident so far more could be at play and certainly not ruling that out. My observations as a expert on correlation was 1 year worth of patterning compared to relevant alternative signature platforms. Albeit it could simply be a alternate ego platforming persona equivalency related to a well known established rhetoric. thank you for the input
Expert on correlation but doesn't read all the data. Ok.
agreed