3
dtxman75 3 points ago +3 / -0

Its not an Aztec temple. This affliction to tying everything to ancient cultures as evil is ridiculous and right in line with the spanish inquisition level mentality creating the worst or prolific "holocaust" in human recorded history. But this kind of garbage has been floating around this site for awhile. Disappointing "autists" who dig fall for this tripe

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +1 / -0

But im not and was the point of my reply. I dont care one way or another on this theory. For now its just that, a theory. The counter arguments and discussions coming from this theory have a certain in step objective behind them where most are demonstrably polar to what I have watched and read on this snake venom hypothesis or......stretching the subject outside of what was presented.

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +1 / -0

Go ahead and actually listen to and review the material you so confidently had to provide your expertise on and you can find out the answer to your question.

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure it does. The investment here is called discernment. Based on my comment you would not have a clue where any of my emotional investment would reside. But as usual assumption of anothers perspective with projection of the presumption, typically narrow and bias is a common and inherent compulsion some folks that just cant refrain from.

This psyop you speak of, where is it? Who is directing it, evidence that there is in fact a psyop going on. Other then speculation what is the basis to your statement? You are behind it? Know first hand the organization that formed and is executing this "psyop"?

Seems there is some emotional investment going on here, resides in your response in a layer of personal heresay.

2
dtxman75 2 points ago +3 / -1

its important to note that behind any of the theories and interviews I have seen there is no inference of milking snakes or logistics behind being able to produce venom from a snake in mass production manufacturing. These are odd long stretch conclusions attached to this topic where someone decided to apply without any alternative critical thinking or optional scenarios. Pure preposition by speculation.

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +2 / -1

That is one take although seems quite disingenuous. This is as provable as any other theory floating around, takes the correct research equipment and verification. The documents provided are what they are and strongly suggest a legitimate reason to research and follow through on the theories around this concept. The "they" people you are referring to have nothing to do with Q people or theories and albeit Qtards would not be a target audience that would make sense given the background of the "they" behind the documentary. Possible, does not seem probable.

17
dtxman75 17 points ago +18 / -1

and yet in none of the interviews did they suggest or state that snakes were "milked" and these used for production of various medical injections and manufactured drugs. It is so interesting how narrow people jump to conclusions by innuendo or suggestion. I am guessing you didnt actually watch most or all of any of the interviews on this topic. If you had you would have realized as a amateur herpetologist the perspective you just provided is irrelevant to the scenario behind this topic of discussion.

2
dtxman75 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good job putting the regurgitators at task. I noticed they dont respond to any of your incipient points either. If anyone is, the lock step narrative being pushed by these 5 or so posters on this water theory is objective misdirection. Their motivation to perpetuate the same thing over and over on multiple threads for like 7 days now is very suspect to me.

5
dtxman75 5 points ago +5 / -0

Same ole gong being beat here by the same 5 or so usernames. What is your motivation here? All I see is the same talking point being regurgitated. Venom in water is psyop bullshit etc etc. Did you even review documents are watch any of the interviews? If you did how did you entirely miss that the focus of most of the information was directed at venom of several types of snakes was being speculated as used as a basis for various "Covid 19" aspects. What is suspect here is the group think perpetuation of one cherry picked talking point on the public water systems. Not once was it stated if present it is killing everyone or kills pets or whatever other repeated assumptions yall keep pushing. It was theorized if present in the water, hence the CDC as documented doing waste water testing for "Covid"----why? and then fortuitously predicting "outbreaks" in those regions based on their testing early on in the "scamdemic". Additionally that PCR testing predating the scamdemic was developed for techniques to detect snake venom, therefore theorized if venom was present in water system could very well be a contributor to large blocks of positive "Covid" PCR tests. Nothing has been thwarted that I have seen regardless of the group think projection provided here.

4
dtxman75 4 points ago +6 / -2

With follow up interviews. Stew Peters chose to name the documentary that was was involved with as "Watch the Water", probably his producers and whoever else involved in its creation. The interviewee has stated such and was not part of the "they" chose to name it watch the water.

5
dtxman75 5 points ago +5 / -0

Im glad someone else caught on to what was being theorized with the venom in water inference. All of the sudden there are these activist style posters about "venom in water is psyop nonsense DS infiltration etc. etc. My guess is everyone pushing the prove to me this bullshit water theory didnt even watch any of the interviews all the way. Seems more they read the headline of the Stew Peters movie and jumped to immediate conclusions. In not one instance did I see Dr. Ardis state as the main point that this snake venom is in the water and killing people. In fact it clearly looked as in it very well could be present in some water systems as a means for pushed positive results with the PCR test. All the while the entire purpose of any of those interviews was, snake venom as the driving factor for various aspects of "Covid 19".

2
dtxman75 2 points ago +2 / -0

Id say thats fair game and entirely appropriate if someone is going to come out on the sword and make big claims and accusations. I just found it interesting a post from here was used specifically and with a response. When I watched multiple interviews i didnt take away the water theory as being essentially the vehicle for transmission of "covid", "venom". Seemed he was proposing that it was in the water systems in select areas based on the CDC testing waste water and this assisted in triggering the PCR positive " infection" data.

0
dtxman75 0 points ago +2 / -2

Pretty funny. Mr 30 year plus water worker that posted just the other day how much bullshit the water theory is a psyop, fake or whatever you said. Your famous, this post was just used on The Steel truth interviewing Dr Ardis as a follow up. HE responded. This isnt a theory about the snake venom in the water. Stew peters pick the name and made that aspect seem the big part. Anyway it shows what is posted here is being cherry picked more often on outlets. https://rumble.com/vv6tu5-out-of-babylon-with-david-straight-part-1.html Around 9:30 minute mark.

4
dtxman75 4 points ago +4 / -0

Someone already commented its David Straight. The video series is called out of babylon. Can find it on rumble. Its a 8 part, long watch. Its interesting. I do not know if the guy is legit on some things, what he covers about law he is spot on most of what he covers.

https://rumble.com/vv6tu5-out-of-babylon-with-david-straight-part-1.html

3
dtxman75 3 points ago +3 / -0

There appears to be a orchestrated narrative being created or pushed here. Regardless of platform, there is an interview with Maria Zack on Stew Peters stating Flynn and Pompeo are deep state agitators amongst other allegations.

https://rumble.com/v1005ni-who-stole-2020-and-who-is-in-power-zack-pompeo-and-gen-flynn-ignored-eviden.html

Seems a "in fighting among patriots" is the driving perception behind these narratives. I have no idea who is what or what side but the timing is awfully coincidental.

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +1 / -0

Probably just gave this rubbish opinion piece "writer" the most views by posting it here.

2
dtxman75 2 points ago +2 / -0

Admiralty law and common law overlap with other groups of supporters only in subject matter. It has nothing to do with fringe elements. Those subjects are the fundamental basis of the evolution of our country, freedoms, laws political structures and sovereignty. I would recommend doing some basic research in these areas. Understanding what they represent will immediately answer your questions and you will be one step further in knowledge. By the way if you do look into this it will branch out into a massive web of interconnecting areas.

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +1 / -0

I see you passed over the question i asked and then decided to spew ignorant assumptions. "You're are losing this war". Is top notch presumption but all predictable none the less. I do hope your parascope perspective can install a slightly wider lense, maybe one day. Until then cheers, i will no longer engage with your pubescent automaton reasoning.

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +1 / -0

Btw dont know if your username is for fun or real. Fellow gun bunny (canoneer #1) 13B here. hoorah

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unbelievable and not surprising all at once lol. Ive always enjoyed these debates but its entirely in vein in an online context. Im just still amazed so much of this persists on a site like this in zealot "god fearing" context.

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +1 / -0

Similarly jaw dropping these kind of sentiments come from a follower of this "movement" cheerio. Im curious. Are you saying the original bible was in english and that it has not been translated abridged and roughly 3400 different versions historically? That is propaganda by these "satanists"?

3
dtxman75 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dont give them reasoning and facts it hurts the dogma. In the end they always come back with, i pray for you and good luck youll need it when our little world view and beliefs are vindicated. Lol.

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thats nice. Describe a logical methodology for connecting the circled text other than selective narrative and you too can now be special. PS there isnt one.

view more: Next ›