5
dtxman75 5 points ago +5 / -0

This one sure flew over alot of heads. Comments are almost as funny.

0
dtxman75 0 points ago +1 / -1

Combining religion and government. This entire post and comments are disturbing trend exemplifying a popular word these days. Sanctimonious.

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm curious what is driving the idea of MOASS in Tuesday. Any relevant DD here that speaks to this. I would like to look ino that if you have any links or references for this.

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +1 / -0

The trees are obviously part of the occult and grew this way over many years for the sake of symbolism.

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +1 / -0

Prime example of topic sliding here. Resulting in a flood of responses centered around nothing that has to do with the content originate in this post. Worked well. Look at all the non related responses.

2
dtxman75 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm almost as surprised to the infiltration of liberals identifying as "metalheads" as well. Use to be a free thinker and conspiracists exclusive, generally speaking. They can't even leave my music alone.

2
dtxman75 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nice to see another fellow Iced Earth advocate.

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fair enough. Context and detail matter. Measurable or reportable levels of radiation in DU ar negligent to near not existent. I should have worded it differently. All radioactive isotopes and materials have some radiation emissions depending on specific activity and decay rate and half life. Anyway yes how I worded my response is patently false. Either way point I was making is DU in a weapon would not be the result of radiation levels as described.

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +1 / -0

These are interesting theories. I have not came across theories of weaponized nuclear reactions as a cause for the tower failures. I moved away from researching 9/11 long ago because it started getting convoluted and harder to dig into without supposition and lack of physical evidences to back up theories, since these matters rely heavily on detailed specifics in order to proof out. For instance, video footage I have seen specifically showing the main support columns that exhibited near 45 deg molten steel cut failures. This condition can and would be created by thermite but would require a mold to encase the beam precisely with a precise reactionary device in place. Have any references you recommend, preferably read material over video presentations. Specifically that speak to the use of Uranium.

2
dtxman75 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is no radiation emission from depleted uranium. In fact depleted uranium is specifically used, among other applications, as one of the best shielding materials for gamma radiation, but there is no radioactive emission from that material fyi.

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +1 / -0

This doesn't make sense fyi. H-3 Tritium is a radioactive isotope. If tritium is present, beta radiation emission is present. May have gone undetected because it requires a specific detector in the form of a scintillation scope specific to alpha and beta particle counter.

2
dtxman75 2 points ago +5 / -3

Did you use to go to the internet on a chat board or forum and ask for prayers when you had a cold? The flu? Diarhhea, uneasy stomach? Or any other ailments?

0
dtxman75 0 points ago +1 / -1

You could be right. Would explain the disconnected ramblings but written in a way to have some plausible Intellect associated content as well.

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +2 / -1

I made no assumptions. I asked about precession and has nothing to do with rotating bodies in space. Precession is a specific arc degree deviation from the circumferential rotation on an axial, tilted, plane. Its been used with alignments to celestial bodies for 1000s of years with reverse location hemispherically on earth by time. Additionally allows triangulation after the location/time value is known. There is no way to align a structure or any object to North and magnetic north by longitude and latitude without this input as a known value. The use of the inverse square law as your example is also innacurate method of measurement because it is not a measurement, it's a calculation and it excludes the , medium, that light travels through.

I can appreciate the long reply, however the rest of your response simply posits questions that are loaded and leading and do not address anything involving precession which was, again, what I asked a flat earther to explain, describe etc. As expected the responses have all been deflection and or it doesn't exist and is a lie.
Btw scientific does not apply to measurements. Scientific is a method. Measurement is a action in Units. It does not apply to a type of measurement. As an example, the inverse square law is not a scientific measurement, it is a formula/equation to calculate the desired factors input into the variables along with the constants to equate a value. It also does not calculate "visibility"

2
dtxman75 2 points ago +2 / -0

Depending on your interests these authors may be up your alley. Some of the books get technical, really far out there or fairly traditional with a fair amount of twist from the normal narrative.

Hunbatz Men, Anthony Aveni, Maurice Cotterell, William Sullivan, E.C. Krupp, John Major Jenkins, Jose Arguelles.

More than liking some of their books will difficult to find either not in print or limited print and potentially expensive fyi. Last I looked for a few I was wanting, that was the case.

2
dtxman75 2 points ago +3 / -1

What does any of that have to do with precession. The answer is 0. Describe how precession works and exists in your flat earth world. Spent alot of time rambling about bitcoin and some theoretical challenge. Could have easily answered how precession works on your flat earth. Explain. I want to be enlightened, told facts so I can wake up out of my sleepy chromatic round earth reality. If you actually try to, then we can get to the harder more adult conversations of other phenomena you can mostly easily explain as well.

2
dtxman75 2 points ago +3 / -1

In other words, you dont an explanation. Its ok to admit, im sure you are still very knowledgeable. So again. Typical deflect, redirect and avoid. The only unobjective reasoning exhibited is your response. Describe the phenomena of precession in your flat earth world. Thats it. How does it work in your factual flat earth?

-1
dtxman75 -1 points ago +3 / -4

So no explanation or viable response. As expected. Make sure to hurry and google what my question is so you know what it means next time. Cheers smoothie

view more: Next ›