I've been out of the service for over 23 years now so alot could have changed or I simply don't remember details of anymore. But what i recall is enlisted display service stripes commissioned did not. Only other difference is depending on the branch of service for marines, navy and coast guard and red or gold depending if overseas or not. I do not recall a silver service stripe. The army does have a horizontal gold service stripe for overseas but worn on right arm sleeve.
These people, I believe, read that decoding symbols blog, or something similar, and one of the write ups went on about "nuclear" energy or fission isnt real and is a result of some chemical reaction. I for one work in these kind of area for many years now, in direct relationship to nuclear energy, and weapons, and the by- products (aftermath) created from the existence and creation of nuclear bombs and weapons either from use or testing. But no matter what, these fools show up in threads like this lock step drumming the same saggy drum.
That is because your exercise in thought theory here is as relevant as wondering if a cow is a horse and horse is a cow because they have 4 legs and stand on them. These examples used to form the basis of questioning are in no way similar in conditions and there fore extent of impact based on the actual conditions of the events.
Where does one find these other anon "groups" this place has been stagnant for my interests (actual intellectually driven information exchange) for quite some time now other than a twitter and minor news aggregate site now.
Although your comment is reasonable. Service stripes are worn by enlisted. This highly "decorated" LTC is an officer uniform. What stands out to me is it looks like a bronze star ribbon award which is award for heroism NOT involving aerial flight and the uniform has airborne and aviator wings. And i cant quite make it out but looks like a purple heart ribbon with 2 gold oak leaves, so essentially 3 purple hearts. Along with the US Army shoulder patch which I have never seen worn when I was in service. Edit- I found the reason for the US Army shoulder patch as not a SSI but signifies US Army Accessions Command assigned to Department of the Army HQ. So could be legit.
It is not unusual at all. That is my old regiment. They are moving the M109s either to or from the training grounds. More than likely it was Gowen Field which is over by Boise. Sometimes we would load them up on train but not for every Annual Training.
In a contextual sense the Urantia Book is not concentric to theology-biblical-bible-religion, it is a book, but where a generally accepted paradigm meaning for bible is concerned this does not describe the contextual basis of the Urantia Book, however the text and length can appear to be so. Originating around 1924 onward, one could say the "new age" viewpoint, in part, derived or align with concepts from the Urantia Book but is not "new age" in a literal sense, as it appears how your comments are trying to attribute a basis of genre.
I do not have a searchable version to test this but near certainty that there is not a single reference to the Annunaki in the Urantia Book.
As far as Satanic, that is your own personal belief and well entitled to it. Stating such concepts as satanic and omitting this as opinion based is disingenuous by nature.
So back to the point. The title is clickbait. The content of the video does not propose what is suggested by the article title. It's a typical GWP stretch on their articles. Thats it. The rest that you are putting here c9mes across as self affirmation. I understand many aspects of what you decided to outline but had nothing to do with the point of context of the video content and the click bait title GWP applied. The video comes across more as a rant and whine session rather than disclosure or bombshell. Although the subject covered is useful it doesn't really have the impact intended, imo. If you actually watched and listened to the interview.
Click bait title. This video is just another Giuliani video of him complaining about , we gave it to them and they did nothing. This isnt a Bombshell. This isnt about that "he HAS" a witness. Its a video of him saying we GAVE THEM the witness in 2020. Big difference there.
Looks like you still live a happy comfortable life and suffer from 1st world privilege and have not hit the personal precipice yet. The points used on how "bad" it is, are aspects comfortable people get upset about. It can and probably will get ALOT worse. Its interesting how so many are "awake" but still soo comfy. That is the reason we are all in this shit show. Because we are comfy and allow it. If that doesnt break and change then it never will and will be a repeating cycle. Buckle Up if im right it might get real bumpy and uncomfy.
lol OK. 1 is an event, the other is theoretical sequence event causal to the origination. Anyway I responded to your comment that if there was a detonation it would be contained and then that the damage would be limited, which wasnt accurate. Cheers.
The damage would be equivalent to size, type and source of fission or fusion. The detonation would be equivalent of the result of contributing mechanisms of the device. There is no containment of that. Nuclear fallout (winter) would be equivalent of the blast radius and atmospheric release coupled by the by product isotopes and isotope reaction of the radioactive material used for fission/fusion, causing the detonation. This would be devastating to localized area upward of 100 miles or more. Its not even a case to discuss or debate whether the damage would be limited. Essentially 1 to 5 miles of ground level within the radius of detonation would be vaporized and virtually uninhabitable of nearly any living organism. I would consider that far beyond damage and in the category of absolute. If you are within those parameters the only god that is in control at that point is the outcome of physics and the one you decided to pray to in your brain before it is wiped from existence.
"do some research" I would recommend you follow your advice. You can start with our National Laboratories and the DOE programs affiliated with these sites. Specifically LANL, LLNL and SNL. I can assure you, nuclear weapons are VERY real. This kind of logic and comments are outside the realm of reality and hardly worth responding to, but hey maybe one of you will actually learn something if you go do some actual research.
I know. Threw me off too but it is also accurate for a woman AGSU, I had to look that up also.