Maybe it's wishful thinking, but there are two things to consider here. Firstly, look at the wording of this:

"Yesterday's violence at the Capitol was reprehensible and contrary to the tenets of the United States Constitution."

Which violence was he referring to? The only notable instance of violence that I remember (not counting a few smashed windows) was an unarmed woman being shot to death while waving a flag.

Now, notice that he mentioned that the violence was "contrary to the tenets of the United States Constitution"? Crimes by citizens are not generally referred to as unconstitutional. Only crimes comitted by government officials or employees are usually referred to in such a manner. Could he be referring to the officer who shot Ashli Babbit?

Then, notice this:

I want to specifically recognize the service of the District of Columbia National Guard. They performed with honor, integrity, and alacrity to protect people and property from unlawful acts.

He specifically praises the National Guard, not whatever type of officer shot Ashli Babbit, and notes that the National Guard successfully protected both people and property from unlawful acts.

Also, Q did say this:

RED4: Movement of MIL assets [10th Mountain_1st Marine_CPSD_Marine_QVIR] to central locations under guise of citizen riot control.

https://qalerts.app/?n=4414

So maybe he has to act as if he's on board with going after protesters.