So I know it was posted years ago but it almost seems relevant to now. I was trying to look up a Q video and the search results showed an article disproving Q by saying all of the predictions were wrong. So, I was like let me check it out. The author uses Drop #16 as an example that nothing happened. But now I am thinking, maybe Q was talking about the future. Why couldn't AG Sessions still be relevant right now? I am reaching here?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
Does seem relevant. I'm too sleep deprived to dig but I believe I read at one point Sessions pursued the Clintons and their foundation during the Russia witchhunt while nobody was paying attention. Could come into play.
This might be something I need to look into.
Just looked into it, you are absolutely right: https://nypost.com/2020/06/03/trump-rips-jeff-sessions-us-attorney-who-handled-hillary-clinton-probe/