I use Linux on all my computing stuff, but even Linux development at the top is being taken over by SJW communist (at some point, because of its licensing, those that get fed up with that could just fork it off)
There are lots of other open source operating systems - many of them too are POSIX oriented
There is one being written in Rust programming language called Redox - using Rust instead of C is a kind of future orientation (since the 70s C has been THE systems programming language, but Rust is designed to be a language capable of systems programming and has many modern language capabilities).
Another I really, really like is SerenityOS - it is written in C++ - the modern C++20 (not your dad's C++). This is a kind of laid back project where participants basically work on things that they're interested in (all software developers are intrigued with the idea of implementing operating systems and language compilers), and it has made an amazing amount of progress. Still a very long ways to go before could be considered a daily driver OS replacement for something like Linux.
For myself, I think both of these projects need to consider devising a compatibility layer for Linux device drivers because then it would be easier to port in that ocean of existing device drivers that are being well maintained. This is a technical challenge for sure because Linux device drivers are dynamically loaded modules that bind to the kernel executable in a way that they can reference kernel symbols - but a mocking kernel bind image could be devised and some special copy-on-write strategies used...well don't won't to go off on all that technical stuff...
One very mature POSIX OS, is of course the BSD Unix - it is like the one that could be moved over to the most quickly. Need to do more of a study on its organizational political orientation before would advocate doing that. BTW, this version of Unix would have been the POSIX OS we are all using today instead of Linux if AT&T had not bogged Berkeley down in about 4 years of legal contentions that held up BSD from becoming an unencumbered open source OS. That gave the fledgling Linux project enough time to garner momentum to fill a vacuum at the time.
The upshot of the post is that every patriot needs to be thinking about these alternative operating systems for their desktop, laptop, and smart phone computing devices. Because you're not going to want to continue having a device that has Microsoft Windows, Apple OSX, Google Android, or Apple iOS on it in a world where these companies - especially Apple and Google - are so tight with communist China and the NWO assholes.
The development of smartphones that are running an OS besides Android and iOS is going to accelerate even more quickly - there are phones that can start using now. Basically look at it as early adopter or beta tester kind of mode at this point. But it needs to happen.
I use Linux on all my computing stuff, but even Linux development at the top is being taken over by SJW communist (at some point, because of its licensing, those that get fed up with that could just fork it off)
There are lots of other open source operating systems - many of them too are POSIX oriented
There is one being written in Rust programming language called Redox - using Rust instead of C is a kind of future orientation (since the 70s C has been THE systems programming language, but Rust is designed to be a language capable of systems programming and has many modern language capabilities).
Another I really, really like is SerenityOS - it is written in C++ - the modern C++20 (not your dad's C++). This is a kind of laid back project where participants basically work on things that they're interested in (all software developers are intrigued with the idea of implementing operating systems and language compilers), and it has made an amazing amount of progress. Still a very long ways to go before could be considered a daily driver OS replacement for something like Linux.
For myself, I think both of these projects need to consider devising a compatibility layer for Linux device drivers because then it would be easier to port in that ocean of existing device drivers that are being well maintained. This is a technical challenge for sure because Linux device drivers are dynamically loaded modules that bind to the kernel executable in a way that they can reference kernel symbols - but a mocking kernel bind image could be devised and some special copy-on-write strategies used...well don't won't to go off on all that technical stuff...
The upshot of the post is that every patriot needs to be thinking about these alternative operating systems for their desktop, laptop, and smart phone computing devices. Because you're not going to want to continue having a device that has Microsoft Windows, Apple OSX, Google Android, or Apple iOS on it in a world where these companies - especially Apple and Google - are so tight with communist China and the NWO assholes.
The development of smartphones that are running an OS besides Android and iOS is going to accelerate even more quickly - there are phones that can start using now. Basically look at it as early adopter or beta tester kind of mode at this point. But it needs to happen.