So to my understanding, elected officials gathered to certify or object to the electoral votes for biden. The protest took place. People, possibly paid by the left, leisurely walked around the capitol. During this time, elected officials swarmed away like rats for recess. After the building was sweeped and secured, the elected officials reconvened.
Before the breach, how many people were willing to object? I thought Arizona, Nevada, Michigan, Pennsylvania and 2 to 3 others had objections signed by reps and senators.
After the breach, objections were dropped from 5-7 states down to 2, az and pa.
What on earth happened on 1/6/21 to make people change their opinion on what happen on 11/3/20 - 12/??/20. How did the breach of the capitol alter their opinion on the fraud that happened 2 months prior?
I understand that, but it isnt really my question I guess. What I am asking is similar to if your favorite sports team got screwed over in the championship game. You watched the game, you saw the instant replay, and you decided "hey, the refs definitely made the wrong call here". You believed this to the point where you would sign off on it.
Then 2 months pass by and its reported that your star rb beat his gf last night. Did you still get cheated out of the game 2 months ago?
Logical answer is yes, the actions happening 2 months later do not diminish what happened prior.
With the vote, they did the complete opposite. They changed their mind about election fraud in November because of a riot in January. These two things are not related and should not reflect on eachother, but they did.
Feelings and emotions are being used to make decisions versus strong logic and critical thinking.