They don't care about long-term damages to society. All they care about it control. It's why Johnson started by tearing black families apart--prior to him and his 'great society' bullshit, black families were actually stronger than white families. He had to destroy that by offering money to women to have babies and cut the fathers out.
Getting the male role model out of the home had two effects--without a father in the home, children (in general, but with exceptions) are raised to think they are entitled, don't have to work, are owed everything just for existing, and end up lacking in the moral department (hence the high number of fatherless men in prisons).
After they succeeded with one race, they moved on to another and started twisting women's minds with the whole women's lib movement, instilling man-hate ("all men are sexist pigs who want to keep you down!") while encouraging us to screw whoever we wanted with no strings attached. This caused a huge cognitive dissonance in those who fell for it--somewhere, deep down, women have to realize that when they sexualize themselves so much (and get banged like a Salvation Army drum by as many men as possible) that it encourages the very behavior they claim they hate. So then, suddenly, it started being the man's fault if a woman slept with him and regretted it in the morning. The whole damn thing is a pile of dominoes that started falling after the first one went down.
If you notice, the people who are against family and family values worship the government, and that's what those in charge wanted all along. Destroy the family--take the male influence out of the house, which is where the attitude of independence and personal responsibility typically comes from (there are exceptions, because both of my parents encouraged independence, but most everyone I knew growing up had a dad who taught independence and a mom who taught that only feelings mattered)-- and people look to the government to take care of them.
With a female-only influence, the whole 'no one should hurt my baby's feelings' came to the forefront instead of 'get over it, sticks and stones and all that jazz' being taught. With people so focused on themselves and what pronoun they choose being more important than getting a degree that is actually worth a shit and will make them money, the government can do whatever the hell they want.
Destroying the family unit was crucial to their plans, rather than a side effect or something they didn't consider first.
Thank you for your reply. There has certainly been a concerted effort to destroy the family unit. You explained it really well. It’s an intelligent and concise game plan, I have to say. I think I can add to the Destroy the Family Unit point. I’ve seen enough people affected by it. They do it by encouraging cheap relationships with a culture of vanity. Mom becomes a whore seeking constant male validation wherever she can. Dad doesn’t stick around, he’s more interested in looking for his next sexual conquest to brag about and to feel socially superior amongst his peers. Who does the child turn to? Who’ll always be there for them, constant and always the same? The government.
They don't care about long-term damages to society. All they care about it control. It's why Johnson started by tearing black families apart--prior to him and his 'great society' bullshit, black families were actually stronger than white families. He had to destroy that by offering money to women to have babies and cut the fathers out.
Getting the male role model out of the home had two effects--without a father in the home, children (in general, but with exceptions) are raised to think they are entitled, don't have to work, are owed everything just for existing, and end up lacking in the moral department (hence the high number of fatherless men in prisons).
After they succeeded with one race, they moved on to another and started twisting women's minds with the whole women's lib movement, instilling man-hate ("all men are sexist pigs who want to keep you down!") while encouraging us to screw whoever we wanted with no strings attached. This caused a huge cognitive dissonance in those who fell for it--somewhere, deep down, women have to realize that when they sexualize themselves so much (and get banged like a Salvation Army drum by as many men as possible) that it encourages the very behavior they claim they hate. So then, suddenly, it started being the man's fault if a woman slept with him and regretted it in the morning. The whole damn thing is a pile of dominoes that started falling after the first one went down.
If you notice, the people who are against family and family values worship the government, and that's what those in charge wanted all along. Destroy the family--take the male influence out of the house, which is where the attitude of independence and personal responsibility typically comes from (there are exceptions, because both of my parents encouraged independence, but most everyone I knew growing up had a dad who taught independence and a mom who taught that only feelings mattered)-- and people look to the government to take care of them.
With a female-only influence, the whole 'no one should hurt my baby's feelings' came to the forefront instead of 'get over it, sticks and stones and all that jazz' being taught. With people so focused on themselves and what pronoun they choose being more important than getting a degree that is actually worth a shit and will make them money, the government can do whatever the hell they want.
Destroying the family unit was crucial to their plans, rather than a side effect or something they didn't consider first.
Thank you for your reply. There has certainly been a concerted effort to destroy the family unit. You explained it really well. It’s an intelligent and concise game plan, I have to say. I think I can add to the Destroy the Family Unit point. I’ve seen enough people affected by it. They do it by encouraging cheap relationships with a culture of vanity. Mom becomes a whore seeking constant male validation wherever she can. Dad doesn’t stick around, he’s more interested in looking for his next sexual conquest to brag about and to feel socially superior amongst his peers. Who does the child turn to? Who’ll always be there for them, constant and always the same? The government.