Is Biden winning part of the plan?

posted 3 years ago by Gogotaro 3 years ago by Gogotaro +18 / -3

Serious question.

21 comments

21 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (21)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– 614FLAGday 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I think biden stealing ( he didn't win) was part of the plan because it served a few purposes like exposing traitors, opening more eyes to corruption, full blown open, in our faces treason. Trump gave them every chance to do what's right and they didn't.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– tcriv 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

i agree. it was part of the plan.

what did we learn here in 2020?

we learned that they have voting machines connected to the internet that transfers votes

we learned that they can literally STOP counting in order to invent millions of fake ballots over the course of a god damn week

we learned that we can have this evidence ON FUCKING TAPE and the judiciary/legislative wont do dick to stop it

ok so with this newfound knowledge... how did we win in 2016? certainly we could have executed the same thing we did in 2016 here in 2020?

but what good would that have done? OK we stay in control of the executive for 4 more years and then what? we do alright for a couple of years but at the end of the day... everything remains the same. the globalists will still be at large in 2024.

big picture... the only way to put an end to globalism (at least in america) is to put their shit front and center for the entire world to see... and THEN drop the hammer

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q