There is one post right after 65 that says "Day 1" but I don't think it's relevant. A clear pattern exists in the other numbers
+65
+50
.>40
+35
Particularly note the infographic in the third post says 43%. Why not just regurgitate 43% instead of saying >40%? This is not an accident and these numbers are not a coincidence.
The way they were dropped the time stamp was going counting down in a similar way. Idk how to check Twitter time stamps after the fact but it would be interesting to see those numbers and these side by side.
If there are no numbers in between (I see there is a gap between tweets) its the BEST COINCIDENCE IVE SEEN FOR ONCE.
There is one post right after 65 that says "Day 1" but I don't think it's relevant. A clear pattern exists in the other numbers
+65
+50
.>40
+35
Particularly note the infographic in the third post says 43%. Why not just regurgitate 43% instead of saying >40%? This is not an accident and these numbers are not a coincidence.
The way they were dropped the time stamp was going counting down in a similar way. Idk how to check Twitter time stamps after the fact but it would be interesting to see those numbers and these side by side.