Not quite. In this sentence "from" wouldn't be referring to the Inauguration itself, but the entire phrase:
"Due to the emergency conditions resulting from the 59th Presidential Inauguration from January 11 to January 24, 2021."
It is saying that the "emergency conditions RESULTING FROM the Inauguration" will last from the 11th thru the 24th. Not that the Inauguration itself would.
The inauguration is an event in a singular moment in time. When the President is sworn in, he is President. No way to extend that process over a matter of weeks.
It is saying that the "emergency conditions RESULTING FROM the Inauguration" will last from the 11th thru the 24th. Not that the Inauguration itself would.
I was not referring at the inauguration lasting from the 11th to the 24th, but that the "emergency conditions" came FROM the inauguration itself, therefore, the inauguration already happened. I don't know if I'm explaining myself right.
I still don't think that flies, though. When preparing for an event, you need to provide security BEFORE it, to prevent people preparing attacks. Sweeps to ensure bombs aren't placed, creating chokepoints for traffic and arranging exfil options. You don't prepare for an OP after it has occurred.
Nah, Trump hasn't been inaugurated. It would solidify the "coup" rhetoric against him. There is no way this plays out fully before the 20th, and I am assuming he'll be re-inaugurated after the 20th.
I saw this when you posted it earlier. I've been thinking about it all day and honestly it sounds like your on to something. There's a lot of ways this could have been worded and words are important. It could have read in a way that reads more like the emergency operation would impact or regarding or even say upcoming inauguration. Of the four definitions of "from" the only one that makes sense in this context would be "used as a function word to indicate the source, cause, agent, or basis". So I believe it reads that the emergency conditions are directly caused by the inauguration. The inaguration is not as important as its made out to be. The only requirement is taking the oath of office and it doesn't need to be a public event. There were a few that took place in private in the past because the 20th fell on a Sunday. They did a public one for the people the next day. The VP can be the one to do the oath of office just the two of them, let's say in the oval office. Trump and Pense met in the oval office on Jan 11 and had a "good conversation". This came out later that same day they met. I don't mean to be rude and not to offend but I'm not satisfied with the answers that this post got. I think this should be brought up again today to be looked into further.
Not quite. In this sentence "from" wouldn't be referring to the Inauguration itself, but the entire phrase:
"Due to the emergency conditions resulting from the 59th Presidential Inauguration from January 11 to January 24, 2021."
It is saying that the "emergency conditions RESULTING FROM the Inauguration" will last from the 11th thru the 24th. Not that the Inauguration itself would.
The inauguration is an event in a singular moment in time. When the President is sworn in, he is President. No way to extend that process over a matter of weeks.
Workers will need a few days to dismantle everything and will you need that peace around them just like when they set it up
Ah I get you.
I still don't think that flies, though. When preparing for an event, you need to provide security BEFORE it, to prevent people preparing attacks. Sweeps to ensure bombs aren't placed, creating chokepoints for traffic and arranging exfil options. You don't prepare for an OP after it has occurred.
Nah, Trump hasn't been inaugurated. It would solidify the "coup" rhetoric against him. There is no way this plays out fully before the 20th, and I am assuming he'll be re-inaugurated after the 20th.
I saw this when you posted it earlier. I've been thinking about it all day and honestly it sounds like your on to something. There's a lot of ways this could have been worded and words are important. It could have read in a way that reads more like the emergency operation would impact or regarding or even say upcoming inauguration. Of the four definitions of "from" the only one that makes sense in this context would be "used as a function word to indicate the source, cause, agent, or basis". So I believe it reads that the emergency conditions are directly caused by the inauguration. The inaguration is not as important as its made out to be. The only requirement is taking the oath of office and it doesn't need to be a public event. There were a few that took place in private in the past because the 20th fell on a Sunday. They did a public one for the people the next day. The VP can be the one to do the oath of office just the two of them, let's say in the oval office. Trump and Pense met in the oval office on Jan 11 and had a "good conversation". This came out later that same day they met. I don't mean to be rude and not to offend but I'm not satisfied with the answers that this post got. I think this should be brought up again today to be looked into further.
Thanks for the insight. This is something that has been roaming inside my head for a bit.