"https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746?
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q"
Hey man honestly that's looking too much into it, the question was clear and he said he knew nothing about it because Q said POTUS had to appear neutral for optical tactics.
https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746?
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
You are correct, CJ.
Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]
Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?
Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.
Q
Hey man honestly that's looking too much into it, the question was clear and he said he knew nothing about it because Q said POTUS had to appear neutral for optical tactics.
This is great too! More plausible deniability on his part but also, take note that he seems to know an awful lot about something he says he "knows nothing about"
Same here, no homo, but he has redefined handsome. First, be an undisputed badass, then you can have the orange hair and all. No other way to pull it off.
Then the orange hair and all is lookin pretty good.
Q and Trump are 100% linked IMO by now. The only question are “are q posts true” and “does Trump have a plan, was he unsuccessful and is too scared to say it, or is he the biggest controlled opposition?” All Q posts were answering was “this is why they hate Trump so much (we didn’t know why in 2017 they are ruining themselves). I am hoping and praying that Trump let them reveal their NWO in 2020 and their enabling act style punishments of his supporters in <15 days so we see how “these people are sick” before the big reveals come.
“Is that a bad thing” caused the news to confirm the q narrative as true. After all, FALSE Allegations are “a bad thing” and having the world believe something that isn’t true is definitely “a bad thing”. They can’t say that Bc they know it is true. We already caught Epstein, so it’s not that much of a leap to say there are more like him using his services...
HOW THE FUCK DO PEOPLE RALLY AGAINST THIS MAN I HAD TDS UNTIL JUNE OF THIS YEAR EVEN KNOWING ABOUT PIZZAGATE I STILL HAD TDS THIS HOST LAUGHED AT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AS SHE QUESTIONED HIM WE ARE SO FUCKED
If that's the case, then you should realize that in such a case he singlehandedly fucked Democracy up for everybody, along with free speech, because he could have cut off this movement a LONG time ago before it grew to what it is today. If it's a giant nothingburger, and we've all been played, then what he has done has caused more instability than a civil fucking war.
I do not see any evidence that would prove that Donald J. Trump would be such a callous, narcissistic, ignorant man. If that's what he is, we voted wrong, didn't we?
I don't believe I voted wrong. I believe there's a plan. I think Q was his operation (whether he used it to lie to us or not). I pay there is a decent outcome.
He's not lying. He knows nothing about "Qanon" because "Qanon" isn't a real thing. There's Q and there's anons. He knew what he was doing ;)
but Q answered that himself after that inter view: https://qanon.pub/#4881
"https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746? There is 'Q'. 1 There are 'Anons'. 2 There is no 'Qanon'. 3 Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2. WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]? DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS? Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected]. You are correct, CJ. Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?] Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop? Welcome to the Digital Battlefield. Q"
Hey man honestly that's looking too much into it, the question was clear and he said he knew nothing about it because Q said POTUS had to appear neutral for optical tactics.
Still, if he was solely responding to "Qanon", it would be common knowledge to acknowledge "Q"
Not if you're taking the words literally.
Trump has been through enough media cycles and legal challenges to live and breathe this mentality by now.
That being said, I didn't notice the sarcastic inflection on "QAnon" until it was just now pointed out. Absolutely savage
https://twitter.com/stinchfield1776/status/1317450311192223746? There is 'Q'. 1 There are 'Anons'. 2 There is no 'Qanon'. 3 Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2. WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]? DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS? Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected]. You are correct, CJ. Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?] Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop? Welcome to the Digital Battlefield. Q
Strategically, 6 days ago would have been a GREAT time to disavow the "Qanon" "Q" "Anon" movement. Yet he still hasn't. Why?*
Well and I love the diversion of "I know nothing about qanon" there is no 'qanon' there is Q, and there are anons
Exactly - but he knew full well what she meant. Expertly done, imo. This isn't a man I could believe would concede to a fraud.
Hey man honestly that's looking too much into it, the question was clear and he said he knew nothing about it because Q said POTUS had to appear neutral for optical tactics.
Another good one took into: https://www.bitchute.com/video/a0l9i1TUrPRL/
Reporter asks Trump if he's behind the movement to take down satanic pedo cults. Trump replies with "is that supposed to be a bad thing?"
Very aware! Picked this one since it's more recent and more forceful toward him to denounce it.
This is great too! More plausible deniability on his part but also, take note that he seems to know an awful lot about something he says he "knows nothing about"
No homo - but I really love this guy!
Same here, no homo, but he has redefined handsome. First, be an undisputed badass, then you can have the orange hair and all. No other way to pull it off. Then the orange hair and all is lookin pretty good.
????????JANUARY 19th 2021 IS NATIONAL POPCORN DAY???????? https://nationaltoday.com/national-popcorn-day/
KEK
Doomers suck. But I'd still rather be a doomer than a Schumer...
Cause Q+ can't be denying it!
Q and Trump are 100% linked IMO by now. The only question are “are q posts true” and “does Trump have a plan, was he unsuccessful and is too scared to say it, or is he the biggest controlled opposition?” All Q posts were answering was “this is why they hate Trump so much (we didn’t know why in 2017 they are ruining themselves). I am hoping and praying that Trump let them reveal their NWO in 2020 and their enabling act style punishments of his supporters in <15 days so we see how “these people are sick” before the big reveals come.
Every Pede should watch this / the other 1
“Is that a bad thing” caused the news to confirm the q narrative as true. After all, FALSE Allegations are “a bad thing” and having the world believe something that isn’t true is definitely “a bad thing”. They can’t say that Bc they know it is true. We already caught Epstein, so it’s not that much of a leap to say there are more like him using his services...
HOW THE FUCK DO PEOPLE RALLY AGAINST THIS MAN I HAD TDS UNTIL JUNE OF THIS YEAR EVEN KNOWING ABOUT PIZZAGATE I STILL HAD TDS THIS HOST LAUGHED AT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AS SHE QUESTIONED HIM WE ARE SO FUCKED
Damn he sold out the people at the capital and proud boys faster than Q.
I thought this was promotion at first, but after reading your comments you sir are absolutely BASED and it is an honor to have you here!
If that's the case, then you should realize that in such a case he singlehandedly fucked Democracy up for everybody, along with free speech, because he could have cut off this movement a LONG time ago before it grew to what it is today. If it's a giant nothingburger, and we've all been played, then what he has done has caused more instability than a civil fucking war.
I do not see any evidence that would prove that Donald J. Trump would be such a callous, narcissistic, ignorant man. If that's what he is, we voted wrong, didn't we?
I don't believe I voted wrong. I believe there's a plan. I think Q was his operation (whether he used it to lie to us or not). I pay there is a decent outcome.
That's all I have to give you, really.