Ah yes. This is so important. Also, if the new impeachment session they are planning For tomorrow doesn’t go through they will be in recess until the 19th to vote. Same day Harris plans to resign from her senate seat. I hope the truth comes out and maxwell isn’t suicided before it all.
It really doesn't matter what the House does, Senate is not in session until Jan. 20. At the earliest, assuming worst case scenario that Jan. 19 does not go as predicated by Q drops. Main reason Pelosi was so hot for Pence and A25. House can't do crap right now no matter what.
They had 210 over the weekend, and judging by today did not gain any more votes.
Yes, every few days, until 19th, but officially not to do any business. As already pointed out by both McConnell and Dershowitz a number of times in the past 2 days. Main reason McConnell telling Pelosi she is wasting her time in the House as Senate cannot deal with it until they come back to session after inauguration (whatever date it is for now, another question mark, The Constitution or arbitrary libtard date from 1930s?).
Not sure if McConnell is on our side or not, because theoretically he can call an emergency session if need be, and yet he is sticking to "procedure" to ride this out. This seems a bit odd to me after all I have heard from him in the past 2-3 weeks where he seemed like a black hat in his actions. If he really wanted to make impeachment happen, he could. And yet...
Also, interestingly, Manchin earlier today said they do not have the votes in Senate for impeachment. 2/3 of Senate, right? Sounds like they may only have a few GOPers, at best, and after the Jan. 6 steal this sounds strange, no? They only need 16 GOPers, and they do not have them? They had 40+ just last week.
This entire "impeachment" charade of the past 2 days is something I am trying to understand. Way too many questions, and more daily.
Yes, so many more questions. I believe they need 17 republican votes to make it happen. The whole thing is pending on Harris leaving her seat, isn’t it?
IF it even somehow gets to that point, then her replacement has already been named in KA, another moronic rat Becera, and he will be sworn in just minutes prior I bet.
So, worst case, again IF it somehow gets to that point, 16 GOPers and 1 tie-breaker VP vote. So, Manchin says they do not have the 16 right now. Hard to believe, no?
Goddamn I just cannot figure the turtle out. All I know is that if he is Deep State then we are in big trouble since he will have packed the courts with traitor judges. Better pray he's on our side.
Trial this size? First day is what, just opening statements, mostly? And our side can only cite charges, not really present much evidence? Just trying to understand how much can be really revealed in 1 day to swing people's opinion. Any attorneys here to chime in?
Not an attorney, but studied law. However, sex trafficking of children IMO would be enough to sway the public.
Although, hunter Biden has been exposed and it doesn’t seem like anything is happening there... MSM has totally deleted all of that info.... so whatever she says has got to be big.
Not what I pointed out. "Just how much really happens on Day 1 of such trial?"
I understand what can be presented, have been following all of this for the start, but there is no way in hell any of this is even covered on Day 1. NONE. Even with a good judge on our side. Day 1 is what, plea, unsealing docs arguments? It will take how long to even pick a jury? I am not an attorney, but this is not a traffic ticket trial.
It's not day one of the trial. Main item of interest is that the court will rule on the unsealing of materials, i.e. some sealed info may be revealed. There's other stuff going on, but that's the main attraction as the last paragraph reads.
I FULLY get it. I keep pointing out it will take HOURS of arguments just in regard to which docs to be unsealed, etc, there is a number I see listed so far, and I am sure black hat lawyers won't sit there quietly and simply take it in stride.
No way in hell anything of "value" will be disclosed on Day 1, Jan. 19. Let me re-phrase that again, nothing that "will change an opinion" will see the light of day on Day 1. Is that clearer now? And as I said before, this even with a judge on our side. If not, then this is going to a short court day to begin with.
Hate to be negative on this particular issue/argument, but we're barking up the wrong tree, IMO. I am a long time IT, analysis is my very strong point, and nothing tells me so far that Jan. 19 in court will make any difference. Reality sucks sometimes, I know, but it is what it is, and I would hate for many to place their belief in front of facts.
"Epiphany" is not the court case, IMO. Lin has been openly saying Roberts is a pedo, Pence is a pedo, and what?! What happened? You see Roberts resign yet, crowds screaming for an arrest/impeachment? Commie news media will give this trial as much coverage as it did to Lin's tweets. Reality.
This case is not it, guys. Sorry. Something much bigger is the "Epiphany". Must be.
Really at a loss right now how to make this clearer.
I have a feeling that this post was important:
https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624 Dearest Virginia - We stand with you. Now and always. Find peace through prayer. Never give up the good fight. God bless you. Q
Ah yes. This is so important. Also, if the new impeachment session they are planning For tomorrow doesn’t go through they will be in recess until the 19th to vote. Same day Harris plans to resign from her senate seat. I hope the truth comes out and maxwell isn’t suicided before it all.
Anddd loving your user name! Haha! Please!!!! :)
It really doesn't matter what the House does, Senate is not in session until Jan. 20. At the earliest, assuming worst case scenario that Jan. 19 does not go as predicated by Q drops. Main reason Pelosi was so hot for Pence and A25. House can't do crap right now no matter what.
They had 210 over the weekend, and judging by today did not gain any more votes.
Senate is in session tomorrow, and again on the 19th...
Yes, every few days, until 19th, but officially not to do any business. As already pointed out by both McConnell and Dershowitz a number of times in the past 2 days. Main reason McConnell telling Pelosi she is wasting her time in the House as Senate cannot deal with it until they come back to session after inauguration (whatever date it is for now, another question mark, The Constitution or arbitrary libtard date from 1930s?).
Not sure if McConnell is on our side or not, because theoretically he can call an emergency session if need be, and yet he is sticking to "procedure" to ride this out. This seems a bit odd to me after all I have heard from him in the past 2-3 weeks where he seemed like a black hat in his actions. If he really wanted to make impeachment happen, he could. And yet...
Also, interestingly, Manchin earlier today said they do not have the votes in Senate for impeachment. 2/3 of Senate, right? Sounds like they may only have a few GOPers, at best, and after the Jan. 6 steal this sounds strange, no? They only need 16 GOPers, and they do not have them? They had 40+ just last week.
This entire "impeachment" charade of the past 2 days is something I am trying to understand. Way too many questions, and more daily.
Yes, so many more questions. I believe they need 17 republican votes to make it happen. The whole thing is pending on Harris leaving her seat, isn’t it?
IF it even somehow gets to that point, then her replacement has already been named in KA, another moronic rat Becera, and he will be sworn in just minutes prior I bet.
So, worst case, again IF it somehow gets to that point, 16 GOPers and 1 tie-breaker VP vote. So, Manchin says they do not have the 16 right now. Hard to believe, no?
Goddamn I just cannot figure the turtle out. All I know is that if he is Deep State then we are in big trouble since he will have packed the courts with traitor judges. Better pray he's on our side.
Guys....look at the Access Code......4645450
46 - 45 - 45 - 0.. 2-45s?
That can’t be randomized
And a 46!!
This is real??
I am setting my calendar to listen! There was a lot of sealed evidence! Potentially some very big names in this case.
NO WAYYYY YESSS
Trial this size? First day is what, just opening statements, mostly? And our side can only cite charges, not really present much evidence? Just trying to understand how much can be really revealed in 1 day to swing people's opinion. Any attorneys here to chime in?
Not an attorney, but studied law. However, sex trafficking of children IMO would be enough to sway the public.
Although, hunter Biden has been exposed and it doesn’t seem like anything is happening there... MSM has totally deleted all of that info.... so whatever she says has got to be big.
Not what I pointed out. "Just how much really happens on Day 1 of such trial?"
I understand what can be presented, have been following all of this for the start, but there is no way in hell any of this is even covered on Day 1. NONE. Even with a good judge on our side. Day 1 is what, plea, unsealing docs arguments? It will take how long to even pick a jury? I am not an attorney, but this is not a traffic ticket trial.
It's not day one of the trial. Main item of interest is that the court will rule on the unsealing of materials, i.e. some sealed info may be revealed. There's other stuff going on, but that's the main attraction as the last paragraph reads.
I FULLY get it. I keep pointing out it will take HOURS of arguments just in regard to which docs to be unsealed, etc, there is a number I see listed so far, and I am sure black hat lawyers won't sit there quietly and simply take it in stride.
No way in hell anything of "value" will be disclosed on Day 1, Jan. 19. Let me re-phrase that again, nothing that "will change an opinion" will see the light of day on Day 1. Is that clearer now? And as I said before, this even with a judge on our side. If not, then this is going to a short court day to begin with.
Hate to be negative on this particular issue/argument, but we're barking up the wrong tree, IMO. I am a long time IT, analysis is my very strong point, and nothing tells me so far that Jan. 19 in court will make any difference. Reality sucks sometimes, I know, but it is what it is, and I would hate for many to place their belief in front of facts.
"Epiphany" is not the court case, IMO. Lin has been openly saying Roberts is a pedo, Pence is a pedo, and what?! What happened? You see Roberts resign yet, crowds screaming for an arrest/impeachment? Commie news media will give this trial as much coverage as it did to Lin's tweets. Reality.
This case is not it, guys. Sorry. Something much bigger is the "Epiphany". Must be.
Really at a loss right now how to make this clearer.
Nice!
I think I found something... it may be nothing but at least get some more eyes on it in case it requires more digging.
This document says “Does 1 and 2” which is obviously plural for Doe... Jane Doe>>Jane Does. Then I remember seeing a grammar “error” that Q posted.
4532:
As the darkness falls so DOES our enemies.
Anon asked if this was a grammar error and replied with post 4533:
[ES]
Mistakes to you are roadmaps to others.
It could be nothing, but seeing “Does” in the court doc reminded me of this.
She's turned into a trump is a pedo meh epstein friends shill lately