I admit, I don’t know much about Q, as I’m just learning.

But, I’ve studied game theory pretty well. And that’s why I’m not completely panicking. An extremely simple explanation of it is that game theory is that it’s reason why nobody nuked each other during the Cold War: Mutually Assured Destruction.

How does it apply here (this is where I speculate)?

Seems that it’s Trump and Q vs the DS (again, im oversimplifying for purposes of explanation).

Trump has two options: concede or fight

If Trump concedes, we go to communism, and he is possibly charged by the DS for whatever BS. If Trump does NOT concede, we’ll call this option “fight,” then America is free, and Q ends up being true and these criminals from the DS go where they belong.

Now what I’ve explained so far is under the assumption that the DS alway picks fight over concede. This assumption also includes in the decision that “fight” also means the DS will prosecute Trump and make an example out of him, anything less would be conceding.

But what if my assumption is wrong and the DS could fight, and make a deal with Trump so as to keep him “in check”

I think it’s safe to assume Trump wouldn’t make such a deal as it would mean the country would go to hell but time will tell.

So the final “nash equilibrium” so to speak, is that both the DS and Trump end up picking “fight” over “concede,” which in this case means Trump by definition cannot concede, and hopefully has an ace up his sleeve.