Posts that are just vague enough to be able to draw 10 different conclusions by a vast swath of the population? Has this been deboonked? Serious question.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
The problem I have with this proof is that Q didn't say when he would be back in the news. So it coulda been a year and that woulda been proof to other people.
His death was to the exact minute of Q's post. What are the odds that that is by coincidence?
The NEWS article posting is exact, not the timestamp of his death.
Given how many news organizations are out there, you can find one that will line up with a hour:minute mark of any Q post.
Just like earlier this year with covid, you could type any number between 1 and 100000 and find a news article with that exact number of covid cases.
This is just an example of where Q is just generic enough to apply to anything really.
What if he instead had an affair instead of being killed? Q's post would had still come "true" because it woulda been reported in the news by somebody.
Even if it's just exact to the day and to the hour, it would be more than any horoscope is capable of. To the minute is just icing on the cake, and it WAS to the minute.