I haven't read many. I got started here only this month. If you have a Q drop that tells us that Q knows about the work of liberal German theologians who want to claim that Jesus is a myth, feel free to share. That seems totally irrelevant to what Q is about from what I have gathered here and the few Q drops I have managed to process in the time I have been here.
Why the eagerness to force the connection to the Biblical Q source? I have already told you that there is no hard evidence for the Biblical Q source and that it has been used against Christianity (and given sources). As long as our Q is with Christ and is working to save us, that forced connection to the shared letter is irrelevant.
a month is enough time to read the drops, so that really isn't an excuse. and Q tells us to 'think logically', so why wouldn't we read the Q source?? it doesn't matter if it's 'hypothetical', still the words of Jesus. the Q source= the coincidences between the Gospels, which is exactly what Q recommends...connecting the dots.
You haven't said anything of substance here and answered none of my questions.
I can't read the Q source because the Q source doesn't exist. There are no physical copies of a Biblical Q source and there are no references to a Biblical Q source in historical documents or even folklore. Also, I don't need to connect any dots using a Q source with the Bible. Do you know how I know the Gospels share so much common information? Because it all comes from Jesus. Okay, I guess I can connect the four dots (the Gospels) to the one source (Jesus). Matthew and John directly witnessed Jesus, Luke heard from Paul, Mark heard from Peter. Why would I need the existence of a hypothetical Q source to figure out why the Gospels tell the same stories about Jesus when the obvious reason is that people witnessed the truth.
I can read Q drops but I can't go through it all in that amount of time unless I am unemployed. Also, I said a month because we're well into January but my first post here was 4 days ago. If I believe the guys who run qproofs sites, there is a lot of unpack here beyond just reading. Maybe you're a genius who can understand Q immediately after just a month of reading Q drops. In that case, congrats, and I would ask for your help.
I will just agree to disagree. I don't think this conversation is going anywhere. There are more important things going on than this anyways.
so you haven't read the Q drops? Q knows everything...
I haven't read many. I got started here only this month. If you have a Q drop that tells us that Q knows about the work of liberal German theologians who want to claim that Jesus is a myth, feel free to share. That seems totally irrelevant to what Q is about from what I have gathered here and the few Q drops I have managed to process in the time I have been here.
Why the eagerness to force the connection to the Biblical Q source? I have already told you that there is no hard evidence for the Biblical Q source and that it has been used against Christianity (and given sources). As long as our Q is with Christ and is working to save us, that forced connection to the shared letter is irrelevant.
a month is enough time to read the drops, so that really isn't an excuse. and Q tells us to 'think logically', so why wouldn't we read the Q source?? it doesn't matter if it's 'hypothetical', still the words of Jesus. the Q source= the coincidences between the Gospels, which is exactly what Q recommends...connecting the dots.
You haven't said anything of substance here and answered none of my questions.
I can't read the Q source because the Q source doesn't exist. There are no physical copies of a Biblical Q source and there are no references to a Biblical Q source in historical documents or even folklore. Also, I don't need to connect any dots using a Q source with the Bible. Do you know how I know the Gospels share so much common information? Because it all comes from Jesus. Okay, I guess I can connect the four dots (the Gospels) to the one source (Jesus). Matthew and John directly witnessed Jesus, Luke heard from Paul, Mark heard from Peter. Why would I need the existence of a hypothetical Q source to figure out why the Gospels tell the same stories about Jesus when the obvious reason is that people witnessed the truth.
I can read Q drops but I can't go through it all in that amount of time unless I am unemployed. Also, I said a month because we're well into January but my first post here was 4 days ago. If I believe the guys who run qproofs sites, there is a lot of unpack here beyond just reading. Maybe you're a genius who can understand Q immediately after just a month of reading Q drops. In that case, congrats, and I would ask for your help.
I will just agree to disagree. I don't think this conversation is going anywhere. There are more important things going on than this anyways.