It's a form of demoralization. Deport on sight. Doesn't matter if they are legit user, bot, glowie, or shill. It's against the rules and need to be deported.
Edit: Hit that deport button, let the Mods decide.
Edit 2:They are very subtle at first. Don't engage, just deport. So far I saw 3 different ones first referring to the Bolsheviks, that lead to they are all jews, that lead to all jews are bad, that lead to dehumanizing comments. Couple anti-black comments saying "riggers get the rope" code word for -igger. Just beware of those types. Deport on sight, dont engage. Let the Mods decide.
Just want to blatantly abuse my mod power for a second and sticky a repost of a clarification on where we stand regarding "The Jews" on this .win. It's pretty relevant for "The Blacks" as well.
We don't want to stifle genuine honest discussion. If "The Jews" are relevant to a topic then it's fine to bring them up in the same manner that it's fine to broach any controversial topic. We just ask that you do so in a fact-based and respectful way that recognises the reality that anti-Semitism has been historically used by our true enemies as a tool to stifle The Great Awakening.
If you disagree with this point of view then perhaps it's best to see this as a strategic move. We want to be an "outward facing" representative for Q, and that does mean sanding off some of the rougher edges for the normies. This movement and the internet as a whole is a big place, and there is room for all forms of discussion in different places. That is how we want to do it here and we are getting great feedback.
I don't have hard and fast rules for you. "I've noticed a lot of these people are Jewish" is obviously fine, and "Fuck off Kike" is obviously not but there is a grey area in between that we are willing to walk to an extent. We know it when we see it, and when we see it we remove it. If you're unsure just hit that deport button.
Thank you for taking the time to logically assess this and for all the work you do in maintaining this board!!
I do not disagree with anything you said. All I want is for people to realize that there will be a movement to demoralize, and it all starts by sowing division by race, much like the left does. I believe in free speech, and I dont want to stifle opinion.
However, I also think (just from 99% lurking here) that people are looking for answers in GAW. Our efforts should be laser focused on promoting answers and positivity, not sowing division. Now more than ever, as we approach the endgame, we have to be a beacon of light. I am starting to BELIEVE there is a plan and it would pain me to see people bickering about what race gets the blame while we should be focused in one thing only: God, family, and country. Good vibes.
I saw some of this behavior going unchecked in TDW, and it would suck if GAW suffered the same fate.
Saludos!
Absolutely. It's a razors edge. We don't want the division that it causes, but at the same time we don't want to amplify the topic by banning it outright.
Why is “I’ve noticed a lot of these people are Jewish” fine, if I may ask? This is absolutely the crucial step made in all bigoted generalizations. (Imaginary person): “You notice that, who cares? Why is that relevant?” It’s only relevant if you are out to generalize, and generalization using race or ethnicity or religion is what racism/bigotry is. The I don’t really understand how this wouldn’t be clear when the entire reason we all react to BLM, for example, is because of their ridiculous attempt to say police shootings by white cops have something to do with white people generally, etc.
It’s not that it isn’t true that x person and x person and x person are Jewish or Christian or white or black - but noting it absolutely is bigoted unless you are able to draw some direct connection between their identity and their actions.
Good question. It's all about walking a very fine line. In a more general sense, our enquiring minds are trained to notice what we're not allowed to talk about. We look for narratives that the MSM isn't reporting on, types of accounts that Twitter is banning, speech that results in cancel mobs. On every other topic, we take those information black holes as a giant warning sign that there's something important someone doesn't want to know.
So what happens if we make any discussion of Jewishness forbidden? We put that same focus on it as a subject of curiosity. Instead, we seek to allow genuine discussion and have the community engage with these topics as they occur organically.
However, this is an evolving policy so we take your point of view seriously.